Firefilm said:John Carpenter's 1892 horror flick The Thing.
They set fire/blew up the place so there would be no shelter for the thing to survive. There would be no where for it to stay warm and have shelter against the cold and so it would just freeze again.thaluikhain said:And, never got why setting everything on fire would help.
Sure...until people came looking to see what happened to the place when they didn't get back in contact.SonOfVoorhees said:They set fire/blew up the place so there would be no shelter for the thing to survive. There would be no where for it to stay warm and have shelter against the cold and so it would just freeze again.thaluikhain said:And, never got why setting everything on fire would help.
I guess it was the best they could do being that anyone of them could be the thing. They stopped it from getting away by their actions as they couldnt beat it. Though i agree with what you said, it doesnt stop it for long especially when people come looking. Just like how they found the body when they went to that Norwegian science base so im sure some one will find the body in the American base.thaluikhain said:Oh, as an aside, apparently if you speak Norwegian, the two guys at the beginning give the plot away when they are trying to warn the Americans.
Sure...until people came looking to see what happened to the place when they didn't get back in contact.SonOfVoorhees said:They set fire/blew up the place so there would be no shelter for the thing to survive. There would be no where for it to stay warm and have shelter against the cold and so it would just freeze again.thaluikhain said:And, never got why setting everything on fire would help.
I always had the feeling the Thing people didnt know they were Things because their minds were being run like a overlay in the Thing's brain while they were around each other then when something needed to be done the overlay/program was suspended or whatever so they had no knowledge...kind of the best of both worlds (from the Thing's point of view anyway).evilengine said:very nice to see something based on the Thing (the good version)
Though I do think it's mostly agreed that the Things DO know they have been turned, at least from the audience stand point. What is more likely is that as the alien takes over a person they inherit all their knowledge and personality, the closer they can be to the person they absorbed the less likely they will get caught. Not only that 'someone' is planting evidence, causing havoc and making sure the humans don't find out who is real and who's human, surely if all the human-things think they're human they would all be hunting and not sabotaging at every opportunity. The blood test proves that MacReady is human, which means that one of the Things broke into his room, tore up his clothes and made it so it could be found later, thereby putting distrust in MacReady and knocking the biggest opposition of the Things out of trust and power. If people-things didn't know they were a thing why would one of them do this?
Also, there's the notion that 'Diabetus' Brimley was a Thing during his axe-rampage. While it's entirely possible he was human and trying to cut them off from civilization, it would make more sense from the Thing's stand point to wreck the radios. Why? Because when the mainland don't hear from the outpost they will definitely send a party to see what's going on, whereas if the radio was operational and the shit hits the fan, the remaining humans can contact the mainland and warn them to stay away, making it damn near impossible for the Thing to escape. Both very possible.
Lastly, I would have paid a fortune to watch Wilfred Brimley climb his fat ass in that tiny UFO and fly away to invade a major city.
Well, I'd have thought writing down everything they knew and putting the info at various places around the base in the hopes it'd be of use to whoever came after them would be a good idea. This applies to a lot of movies.SonOfVoorhees said:I guess it was the best they could do being that anyone of them could be the thing. They stopped it from getting away by their actions as they couldnt beat it. Though i agree with what you said, it doesnt stop it for long especially when people come looking. Just like how they found the body when they went to that Norwegian science base so im sure some one will find the body in the American base.
To be fair, 19th century "The Thing" would be amazing.ritterjcat said:I didn't know 19th century special effects were that good.
He did leave a tape - but he might have blown it up at the end.thaluikhain said:Well, I'd have thought writing down everything they knew and putting the info at various places around the base in the hopes it'd be of use to whoever came after them would be a good idea. This applies to a lot of movies.SonOfVoorhees said:I guess it was the best they could do being that anyone of them could be the thing. They stopped it from getting away by their actions as they couldnt beat it. Though i agree with what you said, it doesnt stop it for long especially when people come looking. Just like how they found the body when they went to that Norwegian science base so im sure some one will find the body in the American base.
It was there best weapon and only weapon they had against something that doesnt have a true form (that we or they know of). when in fear, burn everything down.thaluikhain said:never got why setting everything on fire would help.