Here's what I think about that: http://www.avclub.com/article/fake-deaths-cheap-resurrections-and-dealing-real-g-210402
It's a bit lengthy, and a heavy read, but it comes from a far more genuine place than any of these movies, and certainly more than this article did.
[Guardians'] opening, with young Peter Quill failing to say goodbye to his dying mother, is still blatant, gross manipulation of its audience, and, sitting in that theater with tears streaming down my face, I found myself getting pissed off. Having death shoved in my face in the first minutes of what was supposed to be a vacation from the shitty reality of my life tainted the entire movie-going experience, and suddenly, I couldn't help but see every subsequent moment of the film--the weirdly bloodless combat, the plot-mandated sudden sad revelations that occurred like clockwork every 15 minutes, the perfunctory killing off of the supporting cast?as bald manipulation by people who didn't understand what sorrow really was, or that death wasn't just a plot device but a real thing, hideous and ever-present.
I don't know. I feel like saying "people cry at these scenes that are calculated to elicit that exact emotional response" is really all-too-obvious, and without any insight as to how they work, I just don't see what the point is. These articles have always felt pretty forced, but this one was so obvious it was just blatant.
Agreed. After a bunch of BS examples that made no one tear up, they brought out the big guns this time.
Man, some of the newer formats on the Escapist really irk me.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.