Nintendo Settles Motion Control Lawsuit

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Nintendo Settles Motion Control Lawsuit


Nintendo has settled a lawsuit over its motion control system that could have resulted in an import ban on the popular Wii console in the U.S.

Nintendo was sued by Hillcrest Labs [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/85828-Nintendo-Gets-Sued-Again] in August 2008 over four patent violations covering motion control technology and television-based "graphical interface software." While the company sought a cash settlement through the lawsuit, it also filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission asking that Nintendo be barred from importing the Wii and Wii Remote into the U.S. The International Trade Commission judge was scheduled to rule yesterday but both companies requested that he end the case instead.

While it was never likely that the Wii would be banned from American shores, Nintendo was nonetheless probably eager to make this case go away quickly. Sales of the console, which once appeared invulnerable to conventional market forces and rational logic, have slipped dramatically and even the slightest possibility of a long and complicated disruption was probably enough to keep company executives awake at night. And unlike the usual "patent troll" lawsuits, Hillcrest appeared to be in a good position to cause trouble: It had not only developed the technology in question but also previously licensed it to companies including Logitech and Universal Electronics.

Despite settling the case, Nintendo continues to deny that it violated any of the patents in question. Terms of the settlement, including whether the console maker agreed to license the Hillcrest technology as a result, were not revealed.

Source: Bloomberg.com [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aAglvb3vyk38]


Permalink
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
Despite settling the case, Nintendo continues to deny that it violated any of the patents in question.
If you didn't violate any patents Nintendo, why exactly did you settle rather than proving once and for all that the ball was in your court and not Hillcrest Labs?

And unlike the usual "patent troll" lawsuits, Hillcrest appeared to be in a good position to cause trouble: It had not only developed the technology in question but also previously licensed it to companies including Logitech and Universal Electronics.
This is mildly surprising, I had thought Hillcrest to be a patent troll. That they're not is actually somewhat comforting, as it shows that smaller companies who register legitimate patents can still take on the corporate giants over something that, legally, they are entitled too.
 

Huey1000

New member
Oct 14, 2008
90
0
0
Sounds like Hillcrest Labs is pulling the "we be better than everyone else" BS on Nintendo. Too many things have been invented in other parts of the world, yet America took all the credit for them. Why the hell does it even matter, nobody even cared about this company until they began filing complaints. Well Hillcrest, welcome to capitalism, you can invent all you want but the big guy is allus going to take the ackers!
 

SonicSoulstrike96

New member
Apr 3, 2009
163
0
0
Wasn't Nintendo also sued for the wavebird design as well? I'd heard something along those lines as an explanation for why they weren't making wavebirds anymore, despite the demand for them when Brawl was released.
 

SMOKEMNHALO2001

New member
Sep 10, 2008
245
0
0
SonicSoulstrike96 said:
Wasn't Nintendo also sued for the wavebird design as well? I'd heard something along those lines as an explanation for why they weren't making wavebirds anymore, despite the demand for them when Brawl was released.
You are right.
Nintendo got sued over the Wavebird nearly a year in a half after releasing it.