If you watch CinemaSins, give it a couple of months.Fanghawk said:But here's hoping Jurassic World's accuracy is a little easier to swallow, or we might be having this chat all over again 22 years from now.
You know, I've always been tempted to make someone use it just to collect their frustrated tears...ForumSafari said:It does bear stating that that ridiculous interface is an actual interface called FSN. No 'nix admin I know would ever use it but you could if you wanted.
Mosquitoes feed on plants. Females only drink blood to provide nutrients for their eggs. That said, they wouldn't be carrying plant DNA from the liquids they feed on....the fact that somehow they were able to restore prehistoric plants, which mosquitoes shouldn't be interested in at all.
As far as I can tell it's supposed to be a very small freezer with a limited supply of something like liquid nitrogen. Presumably the reason they selected a shaving foam can was due to the casing being plausibly cold and having a tiny reservoir of shaving foam at the top would be enough to allay all suspicions. In the book Biosyn are basically portrayed less as a bioengineering company and more as an espionage and reverse engineering racket so this kind of miniaturised technology would be their stock in trade.vallorn said:I still don't understand how the miracle shaving cream can keeps embryos cold though... The insulation on that thing would be awful so it's coolant system would either be very, very precise or it would freeze the entire can.
Source? -interestedvallorn said:Still, while some of the science and tech hasn't aged well, stuff like splicing in frog DNA to make dinosaurs, that still somewhat works.
We must sequence the DNA - find out what the genetic code of the animal is. That's several billion letters strung together in a chain. One gap in the chain could possibly ruin the whole thing. In the Jurassic Park stories, frog DNA is used to plug the holes in the DNA. This is really silly! As paleontological critics have remarked, "too much frog DNA and your T. rex croaks." A reasonably intact dinosaur genome is necessary to progress further - putting together DNA is a lot harder than reconstructing a dinosaur skeleton from its bones, and that's plenty hard. The odds of correctly assembling a fragmentary genome are similar to putting a million-piece puzzle together with your eyes closed. DNA allows some room for mistakes (not all DNA is used), but it doesn't seem likely that we could get enough for any one animal.
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/buzz/popular.html
Biologists have created chicken embryos with dinosaur-like faces by tinkering with the molecules that build the birds' beaks.
The research, details of which are published today in Evolution1, does not aim to engineer flocks of hybrid 'dino-chickens' or to resurrect dinosaurs, says Bhart-Anjan Bhullar, a palaeontologist now at the University of Chicago in Illinois, who co-led the work. "We're never going back to the actual dino-chicken or whatever it is."
http://www.nature.com/news/dino-chickens-reveal-how-the-beak-was-born-1.17507