Has me worried, not only that,. but as I thought, it's simply Battlefield with a Star Wars Skin and from what we've heard, less content then the previous Battlefront as well.Aerosteam said:Holy fuck, the game is going to be released in 5 months and it's still in pre-alpha.
I knew about the other bits, but where did you heard the big walker was on rails?Soviet Heavy said:Just a quick reminder that there's no 32v32 combat, that AT-AT was on rails, and no singleplayer.
At this point for AAA devlopment I'm pretty sure beta = release and the game being actually finished and relatively bug free is something that might happen three months after release with patches.Aerosteam said:Holy fuck, the game is going to be released in 5 months and it's still in pre-alpha.
"But it's a reboot" the DICE fanboy cried, "we can't hold it up to the original ones."Genocidicles said:So is there anything this game actually has over the prequels besides better graphics? Because from where I'm standing it seems like it's being outdone by a game made 10 years ago.
And the entire gameplay footage was fake as shit. Like the crap that Ubisoft pulls every time with choreographed gameplay that makes it seem better than it is. If you can't show actual multiplayer footage in all of its chaotic glory, then you're probably hiding an ugly truth.Soviet Heavy said:Just a quick reminder that there's no 32v32 combat, that AT-AT was on rails, and no singleplayer.
Same here, no-one else seems to agree though. I like battlefront 1 and 2 a lot but I like this version to. It'll have a different feel but that's ok with me, I didn't expect it to be since its different developers.Sniper Team 4 said:I thought it looked fun. I doubt it will be that much entertaining in the actual game, because people tend to screw things up, but I thought that looked pretty good.