It's not just a matter of history, or even history plus lazy advertisers (HTML5 has been around for five years now, and since setting Flash to opt-in, I noticed that plenty of ad providers would just put up static banner ads instead) or else I wouldn't be inclined to give a fuck any more than I care about the death of VHS. Thing is, sites like Homestar Runner and Newgrounds still completely rely on Flash, and probably always will, because it is physically impossible to create the sort of content they serve using only HTML5. For one thing, the only other vector format the Internet has on offer is SVG, which so far only has support for still images; for another, games made in HTML5 are much bulkier and take up entire folders as opposed to one compact file, so an upload system like Newgrounds has just isn't doable.
People who think Flash should die ought to be contributing to the effort to develop a viable replacement, and not assuming either that we've already gotten to that point or that it doesn't matter because, hey, they've got their free-to-pay apps and YouTube's monopoly on Internet video; isn't that good enough for anyone? Roll my eyes.
vallorn said:
But I also agree with you that the sudden and drastic play from Firefox was a bit too much. I was extremely confused as to why Flash had been disabled at first and thought that there was a bug with my PC until I checked the news. As well as that, killing off 90% of the internet's adverts when viewed through any Firefox browser was a dick move.
I think Firefox's response has been overblown by sensationalist news outlets. All they did was turn on the opt-in mode and color the banner (which allows you to enable Flash on a temporary basis) red to warn people that there's a present security risk. For reference, this is the same thing it does when you go too long without updating Flash or any other plugin; my laptop, which belongs to a company and has to be updated manually from a third-party admin account, has been doing it for months now.