Imre Csete said:
No Throne of Bhaal and Mask of the Betrayer, okay.
Hmmm. I'm kind of ambivalent on Mask of the Betrayer. On the one hand, I can see why people think it's great. On the other hand, I was going through a depressive phase at the time, compounded by seasonal considerations, and got so sick of what I recall as the relentless bleakness of it (all those eternal condemnations of fire and being melded into a wall, selling the souls of student mages to scheming devils, not much good news about the companions from the main game, and on and on) that I stayed up all night playing just to make it end, and then broke the disc and tossed it out when I was done. (Disappointing that they never really snap but bend, given how brittle they feel.) Never complained about it on the Internet, though... until now. And yeah, I am taking pills for that kind of thing.
I personally would have expected to see Hordes of the Underdark for NWN1 to be featured, it was such an improvement on the lackluster original campaign, though the Underdark as a setting gets old. Nice place to visit and all that. And I had to learn to do the console commands to stop friendly NPCs from attacking, 'twas a real "set_faction merchant" fest all the way through. Except when it was enemies not attacking. The joys of "no easy patching at home" days.
As for Throne of Bhaal, it was limited by the nature of what it needed to be, which was a suitably epic finale for BG. You can't really have all that much player freedom at that point, given how by that point the characters had developed immense superpowers, and that kind of detracts from it. But it did its job, and I salute that. I was happy with my Bioware ending in that one.
Oh, and obviously Brave New World for Civ 5 should be included. It's so great, even Kotaku and Ice-T approve.