Have We Finally Reached the Peak of Zombie Fatigue?

JaredJones

New member
Jun 8, 2015
452
0
0
Have We Finally Reached the Peak of Zombie Fatigue?



With AMC's Fear the Walking Dead receiving mixed (at best) reviews ahead of it's premiere tonight, it may just be time to admit that the zombie needs to be put down for good.

Fast zombies. Rage-infected zombies. zombie goddamn beavers [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1278340/]. Mere hours away from the premiere of AMC's *second* zombie series, Fear the Walking Dead, it's safe to say that we have reached peak fascination (or fatigue, depending on where you stand) with the members of the undead. Like the viruses often depicted in these countless incarnations of zombie lore, our obsession with post-apocalyptic culture has spread to a critical, uncontainable level, and one that simply won't die no matter how many times we put it down.

Now, I should come clean. I am and have always been a complete zombie shill. I've seen damn-near every type of zombie flick I mentioned above (excluding the rape zombies, because why?). I've partaken in a Zombie Run [http://zombierun.com/]. I've written, directed, and acted in a multitude of low-budget zombie fare, and have fearlessly stuck by the original Walking Dead series despite the fact that it hasn't had a consistently good top-to-bottom season since the Darabont days. But even the most diehard fan of zeds must admit that the horse has been beaten to death and beyond by this point.

Look no further than the existence of AMC's upcoming series, Fear the Walking Dead -- which describes itself as "a gritty drama that explores the onset of the undead apocalypse through the lens of a fractured family" -- to confirm this notion. On a network that only holds nine original programs to its credit, three of them are centered around the zombie apocalypse. Three. And let us not forget that one of those three zombie programs is immediately followed by a zombie program that spends an hour discussing what just happened on the previous zombie program. That is absolute insanity -- like following up Mad Men with a show devoted entirely to Bob [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpUWrl3-mc8], or a Breaking Bad spinoff all about the lawyer! I kid, but at least AMC had the common decency to wait for one Vince Gilligan series to end before moving ahead with another (which had an excellent first season, FWIW).

In an effort to give us more of what we (apparently) want, AMC is risking watering down the already watered down product that is The Walking Dead. The network has already ordered a 16-episode second season of Fear to follow the 6-episode first season, which means that by this time next year, we'll be looking at 30+ weeks of zombie mayhem on our television screens. It's an ambitious prospect to say the least, especially when you consider that the show upon which Fear is based has been repeatedly criticized for either front or back-loading entire seasons and meandering aimlessly in between because, simply put, there isn't enough story to tell (or the current team of writers behind The Walking Dead simply don't know how to tell it). "Something More" indeed, eh AMC?.

Of course, whilst The Walking Dead continues to dominate Sunday night ratings -- often competing with and triumphing over Sunday Night Football in key demographics, as crazy as that sounds -- it's entirely possible that Fear will tank. Early reviews for the spinoff have been somewhat less than welcoming, to put it lightly:
-- Hitflix [http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/review-fear-the-walking-dead-goes-back-to-the-dawn-of-the-zombie-apocalypse] described the pilot as "uneven in execution, with the prequel nature of it hurting as much as helping."

-- Vanity Fair [http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/08/fear-the-walking-dead-review] fears (no pun intended) that it will only be a matter of time before Fear simply becomes "The Walking Dead L.A."

-- The A.V. Club [http://www.avclub.com/review/amcs-promising-fear-walking-dead-goes-back-beginni-223892] thinks the pilot "spends too much time on the kind of blah melodrama" and "sacrificing a lot of the resonances that a prequel promises" (while ultimately noting the potential for the show to become something great).

If the first few minutes of Fear -- which were released online earlier this week-- are any indication, it looks like we might be in for a bit more of the same, which fans of the original incarnation will almost certainly be pleased to find out.


(I don't think Gloria is doing well, you guys.)

And it's not just AMC that's churning out zombie media at an indigestible rate. their top picks [http://www.imdb.com/search/title?at=0&keywords=zombie&sort=moviemeter,asc&title_type=feature&year=2014,2014]!

What's the latest spin on the zombie genre to receive the big budget treatment, you ask? Why, that would be Boy Scouts vs. Zombies, of course. Check out the trailer for Boy Scout's Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse, which also premiered earlier this week and opens nationwide on October 30th. (Warning: NSFW)


While not nearly as lazy as anything Michael Bay or Adam Sandler have been jamming down moviegoers throats these days, it's hard to imagine that Zombieland+ MacGyver (as Filmdrunk's Vince Mancini [http://uproxx.com/filmdrunk/2015/08/scouts-guide-to-apocalypse-trailer/] best put it) will really be the entry that completely redeems all the unnecessary recent entries in the zombie cannon. (Zombieland+ MacGruber, on the other hand...)

All that said, I will almost certainly be tuning in for the premiere of Fear this Sunday, as I'm sure many of you will. But when looking back at just how much artistic landscape has been devoted to our undead friends in recent years, does anyone else think it's about time (or long-past the time) we moved on to something else? Mummies, maybe? Frankensteins? And before you even suggest it, no, I am not saying that we need more vampires in our lives. Seriously, screw you, Vampire Diaries.

Whatever meaning or metaphor that could be drawn from the George A. Romero classics of old has long since lost relevance, or at least, it's already been analyzed and discussed ad nauseum. Fear the Walking Dead may very well be another smash hit for AMC, it could just as easily be the straw that breaks the camel's back...then brings the camel back from to life before putting a bullet in its head.

Permalink
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Not yet. But then i dont pay attention to half the zombie crap out there. Look at Steam greenlight, almost every game is a zombie game because with a zombie you dont need to programme AI. So far all i have for zombies are the Romero trilogy of movies, WWZ and Zombie survival guide books and The Walking Dead comics and TV shows. Those and Return of the Living Dead and Wasting Away movies. Apart from those all other zombie stuff is meaningless. The good products in the zombie genre will always be good, the rest are forgettable and shouldnt stop you from enjoying the genre.
 

Fu11Frontal

New member
Apr 17, 2013
15
0
0
Zombie fiction seems to be more or less completely selling this idea of the return to the American old West, where all your problems could be solved with a shotgun and anyone trying to set up a society is essentially an evil cannibal/racist/pedophile. I guess people like the fantasy of not having to shower or pay speeding tickets, but the show was always really strange to me for how anti-community it is, and how the heroes destroy all of these societies and it's treated like a good thing.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,897
9,584
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Fu11Frontal said:
Zombie fiction seems to be more or less completely selling this idea of the return to the American old West, where all your problems could be solved with a shotgun and anyone trying to set up a society is essentially an evil cannibal/racist/pedophile. I guess people like the fantasy of not having to shower or pay speeding tickets, but the show was always really strange to me for how anti-community it is, and how the heroes destroy all of these societies and it's treated like a good thing.
Zombies have metamorphosed from "horror of society's breakdown destroying the ability to implicitly trust others" to "great excuse to do whatever I want". Face it, kids: 99% of you would be the shambling undead, and the other 1% would be more focused on the "fun" of finding drinkable water, edible food, medication, weapons, and transportation after the world's gasoline supply began to break down. (You'd have six months at most before every last drop of gasoline in every gas station in the nation became unusable; diesel, probably a year. Yes, it has a shelf life.) Good luck following that "zombie outbreak plan" when ten guys with guns got to that shopping center first, and they don't want to share. What are you gonna do, call the cops on 'em?

Those little power fantasies of "now I can shoot that jerk jock who bullied me in high school in the face, because he's a zombie now, and then his girlfriend will want me" would pale next to the reality of deciding whether or not to cut off your gangrenous leg because you couldn't find any antibiotics.
 

Ryan Minns

New member
Mar 29, 2011
308
0
0
I wouldn't mind an actual zombie survival game to exist before they apparently run their course. Closest to date is the incomplete project zomboid. All or at least most others are survival only to the point you get yourself those major explosives and anti zombie magic armour
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
The Rogue Wolf said:
Good luck following that "zombie outbreak plan" when ten guys with guns got to that shopping center first, and they don't want to share. What are you gonna do, call the cops on 'em?
Considering how actual human beings act in real-life disaster situations, those ten guys would probably hurry you inside to safety the moment they saw you. Everyone has some skill that a group needs to survive and make the best of horrible situation. Even if it's just skills such as being a reliable friend, a good listener, or -having two hands-. :)
 

Jsan the Candyman

New member
Sep 5, 2014
26
0
0
The trailer for the scout zombie movie, why are the scouts wearing their uniforms all the time? A: Those things are uncomfortable to wear for long periods of time. I'd find the chance to switch out of them as soon as possible. B: Those are Class A uniforms, which are only worn for special scouting events and meetings. Going to a strip club is not a special scouting event or meeting. C: Why are they wearing those to a strip club? It's a big sign that they're underage and will probably get kicked out if the bouncer wasn't hyped up on bath salts.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say the writers of this movie are not Scouts. They just wanted something to fill the "loser" archetype.
 

Sarge034

New member
Feb 24, 2011
1,623
0
0
chikusho said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
Good luck following that "zombie outbreak plan" when ten guys with guns got to that shopping center first, and they don't want to share. What are you gonna do, call the cops on 'em?
Considering how actual human beings act in real-life disaster situations, those ten guys would probably hurry you inside to safety the moment they saw you. Everyone has some skill that a group needs to survive and make the best of horrible situation. Even if it's just skills such as being a reliable friend, a good listener, or -having two hands-. :)
Son... you're gonna die horribly during a prolonged disaster if you keep being that naïve. "People" separate into clicks and then it becomes "us vs them". Just look at all the looting that happened during the aftermath of hurricane Katrina and how quickly society falls into mindless rioting (see London riots, Boston riots, Ferguson riots, et all.). I can safely say 80% of those people didn't give a shit about the issue, they just saw a chance to do whatever they wanted. I mean, how does destroying private business and stealing for people's livelihoods help in those situations when you have a problem with the government? And that's when people know order will be restored. You wanna survive? Find your friends, arm yourselves, think before you act, use common sense, be weary of everyone, and as sad as it is... have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

OT- Fear was always going to have a rocky start because it's starting with the melodrama. Be like if you jumped into TWD during the boring bits of Hershel's farm. They need to focus on building up the world. What happened that the military can't win in the beginning through shear volumes of lead? How did society cope with slowly (at first) being destabilized and how did people blinded by the veil of societal rules try, and ultimately fail, to live? Hope it turns out well, I really want to see the explanation for why the world is the way it is.
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
I personally reached it around the time the DayZ trend was sprouting like a cancerous mass on Steam.

After that, I shelf off "zombies" into the same part of my brain that flares up whenever I see the words "deviantart" and "fanfiction". It's a special type of boring and lazy that feels like the spawn of Facebook quotes.
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
If we are to believe the show, the druggies will be the first to survive. They've already expanded their minds, so strange new ideas like undead cannibals are more believable for them and they'd be far less likely to walk up to one like "Are you ok? let me check your temp". Peak zombie has not been reached yet. Though zombies have become an institution of their own, there are still new things to be done with them, take "Maggie' or "The Last of Us" for example.
 

WonkyWarmaiden

New member
Jun 15, 2010
189
0
0
I still love zombies. Yes there's been a huge surge in popularity and you can't scroll through Steam or Netflix without encountering at least a dozen crummy copies of DayZ or Night of the Living Dead but I still enjoy the good zombie media that comes out.
 

Damian Porter

New member
Aug 11, 2015
66
0
0
Zombies are garbage and they ran their course decades ago. Also, I doubt people who watch The Walking Dead do so for the zombies. I watch that show because of the characters. They are interesting and fun to watch. You could replace the zombies with anything and it wouldn't matter because they aren't the main attraction as people like to think.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
JaredJones said:
I've seen damn-near every type of zombie flick I mentioned above (excluding the rape zombies, because why?).
Hay! Don't knock it until you see it... I mean, it can't be as bad as the hentai equivalent to that movie's zombie premise... (only in the hentai, it effects both genders instead of just the "obvious" gender... :p)

OT: What kept me watching the first episode of Fear TWD was that the pending situation was being describe by a young drug addict, for example, because when you think about how you would describe an undead zombie/infected being, it sounds like you hit the shit a bit too much and could use a good cleaning/flushing of all the drugs from your body...

Other than that, at this point, I would want to see a take on zombies where every human being's super-smart in the common sense department to the point that a random person calling 911 leads up to a CDC exodus that clears the pending zombie invasion over the course of less than 2 real-life hours... In other words, too surreal to not be improbable, if everyone trusted what everyone's saying at face value, to the point that it's borderline pseudo-telepathy, "at best"...
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
chikusho said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
Good luck following that "zombie outbreak plan" when ten guys with guns got to that shopping center first, and they don't want to share. What are you gonna do, call the cops on 'em?
Considering how actual human beings act in real-life disaster situations, those ten guys would probably hurry you inside to safety the moment they saw you. Everyone has some skill that a group needs to survive and make the best of horrible situation. Even if it's just skills such as being a reliable friend, a good listener, or -having two hands-. :)
On the contrary. Humans are inherently selfish. They will more likely shoot you so you couldnt come back and cause trouble. its the movies world when they risk their lives to get somone (possibly infected) inside.
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
Strazdas said:
On the contrary. Humans are inherently selfish. They will more likely shoot you so you couldnt come back and cause trouble. its the movies world when they risk their lives to get somone (possibly infected) inside.
On the contrary. Disasters makes humans band together better than any other type of situation. And a dizzyingly large portion of people are willing to risk their lives for total strangers when such an event occurs. Group solidarity is a stronger force than selfishness, and this has been observed in basically all disaster situations over the entire world. Helping fellow humans is a strong, prevalent trait in the human species, and also the kind of behavior that grants you a higher rate of survivability in the real world. The selfish, hoarding individualist however is probably the one most likely to die.

The break-down of human society in the aftermath of a disaster is just a myth. Although, sometimes it does make for some great fiction. :)

Sarge034 said:
Son... you're gonna die horribly during a prolonged disaster if you keep being that naïve. "People" separate into clicks and then it becomes "us vs them".
Son... you should probably go outside once in a while. Real life bears very little resemblance to movies. :)
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
chikusho said:
Strazdas said:
On the contrary. Humans are inherently selfish. They will more likely shoot you so you couldnt come back and cause trouble. its the movies world when they risk their lives to get somone (possibly infected) inside.
On the contrary. Disasters makes humans band together better than any other type of situation. And a dizzyingly large portion of people are willing to risk their lives for total strangers when such an event occurs. Group solidarity is a stronger force than selfishness, and this has been observed in basically all disaster situations over the entire world. Helping fellow humans is a strong, prevalent trait in the human species, and also the kind of behavior that grants you a higher rate of survivability in the real world. The selfish, hoarding individualist however is probably the one most likely to die.
Only because there is the "civilized world" out there. When you take that away people are less willing to band and more willing to go for maximum survival chances. While group survival is more likely normally, in zombie case a single infected in the group means entire group dies.
 

FuzzyRaccoon

New member
Sep 4, 2010
263
0
0
chikusho said:
Strazdas said:
On the contrary. Humans are inherently selfish. They will more likely shoot you so you couldnt come back and cause trouble. its the movies world when they risk their lives to get somone (possibly infected) inside.
On the contrary. Disasters makes humans band together better than any other type of situation. And a dizzyingly large portion of people are willing to risk their lives for total strangers when such an event occurs. Group solidarity is a stronger force than selfishness, and this has been observed in basically all disaster situations over the entire world. Helping fellow humans is a strong, prevalent trait in the human species, and also the kind of behavior that grants you a higher rate of survivability in the real world. The selfish, hoarding individualist however is probably the one most likely to die.

The break-down of human society in the aftermath of a disaster is just a myth. Although, sometimes it does make for some great fiction. :)

Sarge034 said:
Son... you're gonna die horribly during a prolonged disaster if you keep being that naïve. "People" separate into clicks and then it becomes "us vs them".
Son... you should probably go outside once in a while. Real life bears very little resemblance to movies. :)
You are too good for this world. Too pure.
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
Strazdas said:
Only because there is the "civilized world" out there. When you take that away people are less willing to band and more willing to go for maximum survival chances. While group survival is more likely normally, in zombie case a single infected in the group means entire group dies.
That's the point though. The 'civilized world' is centered in humans, not the other way around. The natural response to band together in disasters is so strong that it's basically instinctual, and it carries across all cultures in the entire world. And it has done so for thousands of years. The selfish response is the exception, not the rule. And that is more than likely to be the case even in the very unlikely (and also, hardly disastrous) zombie apocalypse. :)

FuzzyRaccoon said:
You are too good for this world. Too pure.
There's that. And also, the facts back me up. :)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-myth-of-the-panicking_b_837440.html
http://www.cpbr.gov.au/disact/human-response.html
http://www.crhnet.ca/common-misconceptions-about-disasters-panic-%E2%80%9Cdisaster-syndrome%E2%80%9D-and-looting
 

TwistednMean

New member
Nov 23, 2010
56
0
0
In mainstream media, maybe. But I don't see how post-apocalyptic survival genre can ever disappear entirely. It tickles the nerves too well, no matter how little exposure to the real world dangers you've had in your life.

Also never underestimate the potential of a good old bodyhorror scare...