Syria Blocks Facebook Over Golan Heights Controversy

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Syria Blocks Facebook Over Golan Heights Controversy


Syria has reportedly blocked access to Facebook [http://www.facebook.com] following a change to the social network that lets residents of Katzrin, a town on the Golan Heights, identify themselves as citizens of Israel.

The change came following pressure from a Facebook group called "Facebook, Golan Residents Live in Israel, Not Syria [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=151256367500]," which demanded that people who live in Katzrin, also known as Qasrin or Qazrin, be given the option to identify themselves as Israeli. Previously, people in the town were forced to identify their nationality as Syrian. Israel took most of the Golan Heights from Syria during the Six Day War in 1967 and officially annexed it in 1981.

"Although the Golan falls under Israeli law, residents of the region wishing to write 'Israel' in the Hometown section of their profiles are not give the option. For example, if someone from Qazrin fills in the Hometown space, the only option will be 'Qazrin, Syria'," the group said.

"It is not for Facebook to decide the national origin of Golan residents," it continued. "At the very least, Facebook must include the option of writing "Israel" in the hometown section, as it has done with Jewish residents of the West Bank."

It's a sticky situation because in spite of being a de facto part of Israel for the past 40-plus years, during which time numerous "settlements" have sprung up throughout the territory, the United Nations does not recognize the annexation and continues to call on the country to return control of the territory to Syria. Syria, for its part, has refused to sign any kind of peace deal with Israel unless it includes the return of the Heights.

In such an emotionally-charged and long-running conflict, every little move and misstep can have far-reaching ramifications and so it's no great surprise that Syria cut off access to Facebook in response to the change. Syria previously blocked access to Facebook in November 2007 as part of a crackdown on "online political activism" and according to Al Bawaba [http://albawaba.com/en/news/253689], some analysts believe the Syrian government is using this controversy as an "excuse" to repeat the measure. Not everyone is cut off, however; a Sept. 15 report by Al-Quds Al-Arabi claims that some users have been able to bypass the restrictions.

via: VentureBeat [http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/17/facebook-lets-users-decide-who-has-the-golan-heights/]



Permalink
 

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
They fought an offensive war with multiple allies against a greatly outnumbered and outgunned enemy from a strategically advantageously position and it took them less then a week to get their asses kicked and ending up conceding more landmass then the enemy had in the first place. I'd say that is more reason to share the area then whatever the UN acknowledges or not.

They shouldn't complaint when the residents of said area ask for an option to state their correct nationality on a social networking website.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
I don't see why everyone in Syria has to suffer because of some people in a controversial area. But I'll keep my nose out of it. This is their problem, not mine.
 

cainx10a

New member
May 17, 2008
2,191
0
0
Asehujiko said:
They fought an offensive war with multiple allies against a greatly outnumbered and outgunned enemy from a strategically advantageously position and it took them less then a week to get their asses kicked and ending up conceding more landmass then the enemy had in the first place. I'd say that is more reason to share the area then whatever the UN acknowledges or not.

They shouldn't complaint when the residents of said area ask for an option to state their correct nationality on a social networking website.
An enemy who was getting backed by super powers, and equipped with the latest weaponry. Yeah right. An enemy who shouldn't have been relocated there in the first place too. That aside, like AvsJoe said, it was an unnecessary move.
 

LockHeart

New member
Apr 9, 2009
2,141
0
0
Wooo for extreme measures to overkill anything that annoys the government!

*sigh* This is more than a little sad.

Also, let's not bring the whole 'Israel: good/bad' debate here, though it seems to have started slightly already.
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
Seems like it would be easier to just cut it off in their area. But wacky governments will be wacky
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
cainx10a said:
Asehujiko said:
They fought an offensive war with multiple allies against a greatly outnumbered and outgunned enemy from a strategically advantageously position and it took them less then a week to get their asses kicked and ending up conceding more landmass then the enemy had in the first place. I'd say that is more reason to share the area then whatever the UN acknowledges or not.

They shouldn't complaint when the residents of said area ask for an option to state their correct nationality on a social networking website.
An enemy who was getting backed by super powers, and equipped with the latest weaponry. Yeah right. An enemy who shouldn't have been relocated there in the first place too. That aside, like AvsJoe said, it was an unnecessary move.
Oh my god, let's not get this started already, okay? I'll happily PM you my opinion on the whole subject of why Israel should/should not be there, but we're not turning this into a whole bullshit "BLAH GARBLE DOOBLE DEE SPHOPE SAUDI-ISRALIA!#%" argument. [sup]even though "Unicorn Land" would be a much better name for that new place[/sup]

As for the topic at hand, it shouldn't be too hard for Facebook to include that option. It's a little confusing, but the whole situation there is crazy.
 

Generic_Dave

Prelate Invigilator
Jul 15, 2009
619
0
0
Anyone else immensely proud that people think that we net surfers are so powerful?

I wish democratic governments took a similar amount, if not addressed in the same way, of notice of our opinions.

A more fudged way around this would be the option to fill in your own state in the field. I mean does it really matter if the occasional person fills in "Mars" or "Cockland"?
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
cainx10a said:
Asehujiko said:
They fought an offensive war with multiple allies against a greatly outnumbered and outgunned enemy from a strategically advantageously position and it took them less then a week to get their asses kicked and ending up conceding more landmass then the enemy had in the first place. I'd say that is more reason to share the area then whatever the UN acknowledges or not.

They shouldn't complaint when the residents of said area ask for an option to state their correct nationality on a social networking website.
An enemy who was getting backed by super powers, and equipped with the latest weaponry. Yeah right. An enemy who shouldn't have been relocated there in the first place too. That aside, like AvsJoe said, it was an unnecessary move.
yes cause there was no Jewish people living there before WW2 at all, so not sure why you're claiming they were relocated, they RENAMED the land and made it under Jewish control. other than that be quiet and learn you history

i think the controversy is pretty stupid, tho i do know someone who was stationed in the Golan Heights, the UN had forces in there for a very long time before pulling them out
 

Generic_Dave

Prelate Invigilator
Jul 15, 2009
619
0
0
cleverlymadeup said:
cainx10a said:
Asehujiko said:
They fought an offensive war with multiple allies against a greatly outnumbered and outgunned enemy from a strategically advantageously position and it took them less then a week to get their asses kicked and ending up conceding more landmass then the enemy had in the first place. I'd say that is more reason to share the area then whatever the UN acknowledges or not.

They shouldn't complaint when the residents of said area ask for an option to state their correct nationality on a social networking website.
An enemy who was getting backed by super powers, and equipped with the latest weaponry. Yeah right. An enemy who shouldn't have been relocated there in the first place too. That aside, like AvsJoe said, it was an unnecessary move.
yes cause there was no Jewish people living there before WW2 at all, so not sure why you're claiming they were relocated, they RENAMED the land and made it under Jewish control. other than that be quiet and learn you history

i think the controversy is pretty stupid, tho i do know someone who was stationed in the Golan Heights, the UN had forces in there for a very long time before pulling them out
I know the history and the various wrongs perpetrated on both sides, but this isn't an issue of history and politics, it's about a persons right to view themselves as they wish. I'm Irish and I know from our past that trying to tell a populace that they are "Israeli" or "Syrian" or "Irish" or "British" only causes tension, and violence. Shutting down social networking site access over issues like this only angers and emboldens people. I know I'd be more pissed off than supplicating if this was done here.

It's about a freedom of choice and of expression. And it should be their right now to express themselves as they see fit regardless of what the ancestors of both sides did or did not do.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
Generic_Dave said:
I know the history and the various wrongs perpetrated on both sides, but this isn't an issue of history and politics, it's about a persons right to view themselves as they wish. I'm Irish and I know from our past that trying to tell a populace that they are "Israeli" or "Syrian" or "Irish" or "British" only causes tension, and violence. Shutting down social networking site access over issues like this only angers and emboldens people. I know I'd be more pissed off than supplicating if this was done here.

It's about a freedom of choice and of expression. And it should be their right now to express themselves as they see fit regardless of what the ancestors of both sides did or did not do.
I wuv you bewwy bewwy much right now, you deserve a cookie. Chocolate or Sugar? Or hell, I may have a Peanut butter lying around.
 

Generic_Dave

Prelate Invigilator
Jul 15, 2009
619
0
0
Jumplion said:
Generic_Dave said:
I know the history and the various wrongs perpetrated on both sides, but this isn't an issue of history and politics, it's about a persons right to view themselves as they wish. I'm Irish and I know from our past that trying to tell a populace that they are "Israeli" or "Syrian" or "Irish" or "British" only causes tension, and violence. Shutting down social networking site access over issues like this only angers and emboldens people. I know I'd be more pissed off than supplicating if this was done here.

It's about a freedom of choice and of expression. And it should be their right now to express themselves as they see fit regardless of what the ancestors of both sides did or did not do.
I wuv you bewwy bewwy much right now, you deserve a cookie. Chocolate or Sugar? Or hell, I may have a Peanut butter lying around.
Chocolate please. I have issues with peanut butter...
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
So... A small town gets to choose what country they say they live in, but everyone in Kent still has to say they live in London?

Yeah. Yeah that makes sense. Thank you Facebook...