I have to say, as a math major I'm a bit offended by this. You're comparing some of the hardest parts of your job as an artist to easily the easiest part of my job as a mathematician. I agree with your statement that it's hard being imaginative all the time, and that's exactly what my job requires me to do as well. There are a lot of difficult problems still out there unsolved, and since all the well known approaches have been tried on them, all we have left is our creativity to come up with a new solution method. In fact, right now I'm (apparently doing a poor job of) writing a thesis, and I'm stuck trying to think of a way of effectively motivating our methods to our peers, our equivalent to 'judges'.derelict said:EDIT: To agree with the art major up there, art is one of the hardest things to get into. Creativity has been harshly judged for ages, whereas 2+2 always equals 4, your rendition of a Picasso may not be as well accepted. Plus, there's a billion art majors out there, so its quite a bit harder to shine in a river full of diamonds and shit. Plus, nobody really asks you how many different ways to make 2+2=4, however graphic artists get asked different ways to make a line, a face, a pose, all the time, and get demands to equate mundane things with a certain style, etc. It's hard work being imaginative all the time.
buggy65" post="18.183803.5513069 said:I am a math major and this saddens and angers me.even though this question is quite easy, you have to remember that a majority people at uni (or whatever you call it over there) will not ever need to learn it. I am doing a Bachelor of Science majoring in Biotechnology and the only maths we need to do is basic statistics in the first year, so it would be understandable for one to forget information that is not going to be useful.
Also, there are a lot of people who study fake majors (like Art, Music, etc), and they don't tend, or need, much in the way of math classes so it's somewhat understandable.Also, coming from a musical background (12 years of classical piano and baroque pipe organ) I find this insulting. To call art and music a "fake" major is completely disregarding the amount of work that goes into those subjects. Can I call a maths major "fake" because you don't learn things from a science degree in it? When you can compose a symphony for a full orchestra and perform on a weekly basis (successfully) some sort of musical instrument, then you can comment on "fake" majors as much as you like.
What really annoys/disappoints me is that there are still people out there who do not beleive in evolution or climate change when the evidence is everywhere.
end rant.
Not as easy but still not in my opinion hardBurst6 said:FIND THE ROOTS OF x^3-64.
Eh maybe it came out wrong. Didn't think comparing 2+2 to drawing a line was a bad comparison. I still think math is easier though. I'm not a physics major or anything but I still think its easier to explain complex equations than explain what the hell "art deco" means, specifically. Math is more explicit by nature, art lay more in the lines of pleasing the user than hitting on a fact; even with multiple ways to solve equations in math, there's still infinite ways to make a picture classify as art deco in style.Kailat777 said:snip
Well, buggy, I must apologize. I am old. I was not aware that students these days are required to take Algebra I to graduate. I believe it was optional back in the day that I went to school. (I had it in 9th grade in central Oklahoma in 1983.) So, I would like to formally modify my opinion. I will now be slightly more angry about this as well. Long live (-b+/-(b^2-4ac)^(1/2))/2a! (Um, that's not a factorial at the end. It's just an exclamation point for emphasis.)2. I am upset because in order to get into college (here in America) you need to pass high school and the SATs. Both of which require Algebra I. Trig and Calculus are a secondary option. This is why I didn't expect people to know how to derive, or what sin(pi/2) was. FOIL is something everyone had to learn.
Oh dear Christ. Trivial things like gravity? Sir Issac Newton is going to be pissed...that link goes way beyond a simple misunderstanding, landing in the territory of entitled prick syndrome. Or hell, maybe I'm the entitled prick for thinking that everyone should have at least a rudimentary grasp of the forces that govern their lives :/some1stolemyusername said:and if this is to be taken as accurate http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~det/phy2060/heavyboots.html then it is not unexpected. the fact is that people tend not to remember stuff they won't use on a regular basis, and considering there is a fair portion of students @ uni that would probably not use algebra beyond high school, then why does it matter.
grow up and learn not to care about trivial things.
derelict said:That was not my point, i was simply saying "so what, some people forgot, does it really matter?"some1stolemyusername said:Oh dear Christ. Trivial things like gravity? Sir Issac Newton is going to be pissed...that link goes way beyond a simple misunderstanding, landing in the territory of entitled prick syndrome. Or hell, maybe I'm the entitled prick for thinking that everyone should have at least a rudimentary grasp of the forces that govern their lives :/
I was aiming at a more broad generalisation. as was written, after prompting (i.e. follow up Q) ppl changed their answers when their mistake was implied, once they had to consider the meaning of their answer. i would like to think that if the same sort of mental prodding was used after the OP's original question, then perhaps more people would be able to recall how to answer correctly.