i pretty sure that me and you are about the only two people that have ever played that game. and i agree with you fully, it was a bloody gem on the PS2 that EVERYONE missed out on because they were too busy with... i donno medal of honor, and the Ubisoft dominate games, and the shittiness of xbox (original). but that game dominates any James Bond game, as it could be considered as a movie considering its original story line and all star casting...mmmmmmmmm Shannon Elizabeth.
in terms of one problem that i have with this article is the idea of no character development. well yes the movies are shallow action tittie fest, which i wont complain about, you dont learn much about bond himself, but my question is, why are you watching the movies without reading the books, it seems asinine to me to think that the two go hand in hand, and you learn much more about bond himself.
id personally like to seen another Daniel Craig Bond game with more thought and less Treyarch in it, that game certainly didn't receive poor sales because of WaW, it received poor sales because it seemed to suffer from bored desk clerk syndrome, much like 2k's borderlands did, these games come out right before big name titles such as World at War and Bioshock 2 respectively and are made by the interns who think they have a big shot, but inevitably fail due to retardation. which has seemed to plague the James Bond games, will this new James
Bond change that? not likely with CoD Vietnam on the horizon but one can only hope. i got me N64 specifically for Goldeneye and since that day ive been waiting for that one Bond game to break through and be the God send the gaming world deserves.