Making Fun Games Isn't Enough, According To Harmonix

[Andy Chalk]

Making Fun Games Isn't Enough, According To Harmonix

In a brief interview with Harmonix [http://www.newsweek.com/id/81373]said that just making a fun game isn't enough to succeed in the industry.

Discussing the company's early history of critical acclaim and commercial failure with their first release, Amplitude [http://www.allgame.com/cg/agg.dll?p=agg&sql=1:20475], Rigopulos said, "It was a really hard lesson for us to realize that making a fun game just isn't enough for a game developer. We had to start thinking about making games that were easier to sell."

But following the company's alliance with Activision [http://www.redoctane.com/], which acquired RedOctane in May 2006). "Our original mission statement was to bring the joy of music making to everyone out there in the world who may not necessarily have all the experience that comes from having learned a real instrument," said Egozy. "We had no idea that it would become this huge."

The full Newsweek interview is available here [http://www.newsweek.com/id/81373].


Permalink

 

[Darkong]

"making a fun game just isn't enough"

No but sadly with a celebrity endorsment and/or a license behind it any old tat can sell well as EA continually prove.

 

[laikenf]

God, that just confirms what a lot of people think of the gaming industry these days.

 

[Lance Icarus]

It's really true. Fun games simply aren't enough to sell. I mean, don't we all have at least 3 games that everyone should have played in 2007? You simply need something else with the game to try and hook the casual user who may not read forum posts and constantly check gaming sites.

Usually this is a license, or a "bold move" (aka Nintendo Wii's remote controller, Guitar Hero guitar, WarioWare in general), or simply pumping out an advertising budget that is guaranteed to get people interested (Halo 3). But simply having a "fun game" doesn't mean anyone will care.