Latin America to Also Get StarCraft II Subscription Option

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Latin America to Also Get StarCraft II Subscription Option



If you're hungering to get your Zerg rush on and you live in Central or South America, you'll have the option to go with the cheap-at-first subscription model for StarCraft II.

Last month, we learned that Blizzard was considering an optional subscription-based pricing model for only in Russia [http://www.amazon.com/Starcraft-II-Wings-Liberty-Pc/dp/B000ZKA0J6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1278514687&sr=1-1]. As it turns out, it won't be only in Russia - the Latin American versions of the game will have the option to operate under this model as well.

According to GI.biz [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/starcraft-ii-offers-subscription-payments-in-south-america], the Spanish-localized version of StarCraft II in Mexico will cost 299 pesos ($23), the Argentinian version will run for 119 pesos ($31), and the Chilean version will be priced at 13,900 pesos ($26).

The lower-priced Latin American versions will come with six months worth of play (Battle.net and single-player); to play beyond that you'll need to pay every 30 or every 60 days - specific pricing hasn't been announced yet. Presumably, you'll be able to upgrade to the unlimited game at any point (as with the Russian version), and if you don't feel like doing that can just buy the full-priced game right off the bat and skip all of the hassle.

"One of our design goals for StarCraft II was to make it accessible to a wide range of players, from beginners to veterans," said Blizzard boss and founder Mike Morhaime. "The same is true with regard to our pricing options - we want to make sure players have the flexibility to experience the game according to their own preferences and play style."

If you turned your nose up at the word "subscription," then hold on a second - this isn't a bad thing at all. I've gone on the record as being quite in favor of this [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/view-from-the-road/7444-A-View-From-The-Road-The-Perfect-Subscription] before, and my opinion hasn't changed: Giving players different pricing models that they can choose from is a very good thing.

If you think you'll be playing SC2 for years to come, get the full-priced version right off the bat and never hear a word about "subscription" ever again. If you're looking forward to it but not sure it'll capture your attention for more than six months, pick up the cheap version and enjoy a great game for half the cost - if you turn out to like it, pay the difference and upgrade.

Giving players options is a very, very good thing, whether for their play style or for their wallet.

(GI.biz [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/starcraft-ii-offers-subscription-payments-in-south-america])

Permalink
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,594
0
0
The inclusion of single player in the benefits of this subscription worries me (unless it's a typo).
 

Lucane

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,491
0
0
Hmm is this good marketing or a slant on saying we don't trust your territory? and is the article saying the single player is limited to the time of subscription as well? If not ok I guess.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Lucane said:
Hmm is this good marketing or a slant on saying we don't trust your territory? and is the article saying the single player is limited to the time of subscription as well? If not ok I guess.
Delusibeta said:
The inclusion of single player in the benefits of this subscription worries me (unless it's a typo).
From what I can tell, yes the singleplayer will be under subscription (though there is always the Offline mode, so... not sure how that would work. Maybe it's just the B.net benefits like co-op?). If that bothers you, then get the full-priced game and don't worry about it.
 

microhive

New member
Mar 27, 2009
489
0
0
Lucane said:
Hmm is this good marketing or a slant on saying we don't trust your territory? and is the article saying the single player is limited to the time of subscription as well? If not ok I guess.
The article states Battle.net fee not the campaign. And we're already aware of the fact that the campaign can be played offline so it ain't an issue.
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
Well it is nice to see them thinking of the Latin Americas and there economy.

I am sure they will appreciate!
 

Kiithid

New member
Aug 12, 2009
151
0
0
Now where's Brazil on that list ><
Even though every gamer I know down here will be getting the full version asap.
 

TOGSolid

New member
Jul 15, 2008
1,509
0
0
When I first read the article headline I was like: RAAAAAAAAAAAAGE
And then I read the article and was like: :D :D :D :D


That's a really good idea and a great option to have for people who may not be able to afford a full priced game right off the bat. I hope other companies pick this up and use it on a world wide model. It'd probably help to stave off piracy levels in all honesty.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Kiithid said:
Now where's Brazil on that list ><
Even though every gamer I know down here will be getting the full version asap.
I couldn't find the pricing for Brazil, but as far as I know it'll use the same model there too.
 

SaintWaldo

Interzone Vagabond
Jun 10, 2008
923
0
0
How about including non-Battle.Net connected LAN play at ANY price?

It's retarded to require internet to play with the person next to me, and it always will be.
 

Eliam_Dar

New member
Nov 25, 2009
1,517
0
0
cool...sort of, I am from Argentina, but I HATE spanish localized versions, so I prefer to pay the full price