European Commission Approves Activision Blizzard

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
European Commission Approves Activision Blizzard


European Union regulators have given the green light to the merger between Activision Blizzard [http://www.vivendi.com/corp/en/home/index.php].

The $18.9 billion deal will give French media giant Vivendi a 52 percent interest in the new company that is expected to generate annual revenues of $3.8 billion. Despite its massive size, the European Commission found that "the combined firm would continue to face several strong, effective competitors, such as Microsoft [http://www.ea.com]." Even with the addition of Activision Blizzard to the market, Electronic Arts remains the largest independent game publisher in the world.

According to a Next-Gen [http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9992&Itemid=2] report, one aspect of the deal scrutinized by regulators was whether Activision's relationship with Vivendi Music Group would give them an unfair advantage over other publishers seeking to license music for use in games. But the Commission found that competitors would still have "significant access" to licensed music from other labels after the completion of the deal.

Having received regulatory approval, the merger is expected to be officially completed by mid-2008. Company representatives have said the merged Activision Blizzard will be "the world's largest, most profitable pure-play videogame publisher."


Permalink
 

Melaisis

New member
Dec 9, 2007
1,014
0
0
Goodbye, EA!

Although, saying that, it'll be strange to see how this turns out. I mean, if I think about it, I've bought 100 times more games from Steam than I ever have from Activision or Blizzard. If the Commission and commentators are judging these companies on turnover and staff employed alone, then it really isn't representing the 'alternate' ways of publishing, is it? I'd consider Steam to be up there as one of the world's biggest publishers, but because it doesn't deal in physical objects, it appears that it isn't even listed as one of the competitors.

Not really relevant, but I'm just pointing out the idiocy of when boards decide this sort of thing.