BioWare Mythic Swears Warhammer Online Isn't a Money Pit

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
BioWare Mythic Swears Warhammer Online Isn't a Money Pit



Despite what you may believe, BioWare Mythic would like to inform you that Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning is actually turning a profit.

Before the launch of Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning in 2008, I spoke with Mythic's then-boss Mark Jacobs about his hopes for the game. Jacobs told me that the mark of a healthy MMOG - one with an expanding playerbase - was that it was adding new servers, rather than consolidating them. "If we ever end up merging servers," Jacobs said, "We'll be in trouble."

Last March, Warhammer Online has been going through tough times [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/90081-Warhammer-Online-Merges-Servers], BioWare Mythic promises that it's reached a profitable equilibrium.

Speaking with Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/ea-warhammer-online-is-profitable] in advance of the game's two-year anniversary, general manager Eugene Evans said that the game was healthy and not, in fact, a giant money sink for BioWare Mythic's parent company EA. "We're still running it. The game is profitable. We have a team that's engaged in it. We're seeing a great response from the community as they rediscover the game."

"When we launched we were up against the biggest competitor in the business, and arguably one of the biggest franchises in our business, with World of Warcraft. That was a huge challenge ... Here we are two years later, and despite all the naysayers we continue to improve."

According to Evans, the Endless Trial promotion - which allows would-be players unlimited access to the first tier of the game's content rather than a standard 10-or-14-day pass - is working fairly well for the MMOG. "We were able to present a new trial experience that gave people the time to discover what was great about the game ... We're still getting tens of thousands of people a month coming through trying that experience."

Though producer Carrie Gouskos admitted that WAR had perhaps tried to do too much at launch and had overextended itself, Evans argued that MMOGs shouldn't be defined by how they launch, but how they grow down the line.

"These games are not defined by the product you have at launch. They're defined by what you do with the game and how you respond to the community."

(Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/ea-warhammer-online-is-profitable])

Permalink
 

kingcom

New member
Jan 14, 2009
867
0
0
Good on them I guess. Its good that there are constant MMO competition, it means Blizzard has to work hard to constantly improve WoW.
 

Chalksoup

New member
Mar 6, 2009
13
0
0
Yea, Warcraft would probly have a difficult time if it was difined by what it was was at launch against more resent mmos, although that was quite a while ago that it was...
 

gilthanan

New member
May 25, 2008
72
0
0
You know, I'd actually believe it.

But
John Funk said:
BioWare Mythic Swears Warhammer Online Isn't a Money Pit

"These games are not defined by the product you have at launch. They're defined by what you do with the game and how you respond to the community."

(Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/ea-warhammer-online-is-profitable])

Permalink
That, is a load of crap. You cannot make promises you don't keep, you can't deliver a halfhearted, bullshit experience and expect players to sit in your pointless endgame. You can't take a 2 month long break after Christmas, which was 3 months after game release, perhaps one of the most important times as most people started hitting end game. You have to release a product that is finished, the model of MMO's, release something then fix it later is dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. You can't do it anymore, you can't. Not when I can go and play a game like WOW that is finished and actually has end game and a reason to log on. You have to release a finished full fledged product, or don't bother. Age of Conan failed for this, Warhammer failed for it, Aion failed for it, every game since WOW has hit its stride is doomed to fail for this. When WoW launched, there was no all encompassing MMO, Everquest was big, but nothing compared to what WoW became. Even if later they become great games, no one will ever look back, Vanguard is a prime example.

And, they didn't respond to the community. Their stupid armor system, that EVERYONE in beta said was a bad idea, was implemented, and nobody liked it. I have to do a stupid PvE grind so I can compete in PvP content? Stupid fucking idea. And that was the first of many things they refused to look to the community for, because they were too busy trying to get the casual WoW crowd that were never actually going to play the game for long, just long enough for Lich King to come out 2 months later.

Not to mention you shouldn't make a game that competes directly with WoW. Mythic turned what should have been a PvP experience into a PvE one, which burned their most fans and caused the game to fall apart. I was there in it's glory days, and they are long since past.

I am rather bitter.
 

Saikonate

New member
Nov 20, 2008
41
0
0
It's pretty easy to turn a profit when you charge people 30 times for a month's subscription =P
 

The Lost Big Boss

New member
Sep 3, 2008
728
0
0
Ironical I played this at launch then stopped playing it because I just wasn't feeling it. About two months ago I remembered I never closed the account, I have been being billed automatically every six months for 77$. Thats around 450$ that I have been paying them for no reason. You're welcome.
 

DancePuppets

New member
Nov 9, 2009
197
0
0
I really quite enjoyed WAR when I was playing it last year, although I played it over the summer when there was no one else around really in my University town (I'm stuck here doing a PhD). It definitely had issues but I really enjoyed the RvR stuff, I think the biggest problem for the server I was on was an imbalance between Order and Destruction, meaning that Order were constantly outnumbered.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
I gave Warhammer a solid three months of play, I have to say I really enjoyed myself. The PvP was fun and addicting; with a little spice of strategic positioning thrown in. My two favorite classes were the engineer and sorcerer (rain death from on high with aoe dots :3 ) I think I leveled both to the third tier of gameplay.

Unfortunately at the end of the day while all that PvP was fun and compelling I felt the game was lacking in a satisfying PvE experience. Granted I understood quite well it had been billed as a very PvP centered game. There was also the nagging sensation in the back of my head that at every turn I found similarities to WoW. No, I'm not one of those people who say they copied WoW, to say that about an MMO in a fantasy setting is just stupid. The problem was the setting though and the more I played the more I had the itch to return to WoW despite the fun I was having on Warhammer. Eventually though, I did succumb and returned to WoW.

In the end Warhammer lost me as a customer simply because I had a longer history playing WoW and thanks to the setting was reminded at every turn about it.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
This game just didn't feel like Warhammer to me. When I think Warhammer, I think hundreds of Orcs smashing Dwarves and Goblins to tiny bits in massive melees. This game turned that into a couple of Black Orcs soaking up damage while a few dozen Wizards waited turns throwing fireballs at each other.
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
I stopped playing the game when i found out they lied to me horribly! I was under the assumption that all the (kill)quests can be completed prior to excepting the quests, that all your kills are tracked. But a las that is not true!

On the upside, the ability to raid any player area, including n00b areas at will made for a very exciting when adventuring alone or in small numbers! (getting ganked wasnt annoying since you lost nothing in the process, only the distance traveled) I mean really nothing is more fun than having a n00b raid where a dozen or so low lvls beat up on a player that is 10 lvls above them! XD
 

samwise970

New member
May 2, 2010
54
0
0
Saikonate said:
It's pretty easy to turn a profit when you charge people 30 times for a month's subscription =P
Still waiting for my money back from them as well.

Terrible customer service over there.
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
Warhammer Online was a very well-made game, but it just felt too similar to WoW to hold my interest. It was actually slightly better than WoW in my opinion, but it really felt like I was playing the same game.

Plus, I loved the Choppa class during beta, and they just removed it before launch. That made me a little sad.
 

KiKiweaky

New member
Aug 29, 2008
972
0
0
Timbydude said:
Warhammer Online was a very well-made game, but it just felt too similar to WoW to hold my interest. It was actually slightly better than WoW in my opinion, but it really felt like I was playing the same game.

Plus, I loved the Choppa class during beta, and they just removed it before launch. That made me a little sad.
They took it tout so they could hold an event and release them after a month or 2, they are a proper bad ass class. Really really dangerous if they are played well.

I've been playing this solidly since release have almost maxed out my main characters pvp rank, and I have to say I have some very fond memories of this game. Battering down keep doors and slaughtering all the destruction players inside is mmmm :)

Performance was its biggest problem imo, sometimes keeps had so many people in them that it became a slide show eventually leading to server crashes. Even though they are up again withing miniutes it's still a huuge drag. There was one point where we crashing our server 2 or 3 times a night due to the sheer amount of people that were attacking one point.

I really liked my time playing, on a sort of break atm. Dont have a credit card and cant pay with my laser card anymore so I'm just playing other games. The end game content which very quicly became stale and boring has been revitalised into one of the best experiences I have had playing an mmo.

24 v 24 instances culminating in the death of a king, they used to have 48 v 48 but the unpredictability of who you could get (good bad opposition or allies) meant it generally turned into a stupidly one sided game 99% of the time.

Joined a small guild with imo some of the best players we have on the server, we have had times where we have won despite being outnumberred 5, 6, 7 to 1. Moments like that are what make the game worth playing.
 

Loonerinoes

New member
Apr 9, 2009
889
0
0
"These games are not defined by the product you have at launch. They're defined by what you do with the game and how you respond to the community."

Wrong. They're defined by both. You get only one chance to make a good first impression and even that can be later ruined through things like what happened to Star Wars Galaxies. Still I remain hopeful that they manage to pull through, even though server consolidation is usually not a good sign. But who knows...anyone know of an MMO that went through a rough patch, but later swung back upwards due to good response to community complaints?
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
14,469
3,425
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
war was alot of fun, altho they definatly pushed it out too soon, when I joined a few months after launch it still had weird problems like getting stuck on things and others but once it got patched it was so much more fun to play, altho by that point it was loosing ppl too fast and since the game is built around pvp you have to have good numbers for it to be fun, its pve worked but it was like wow around launch, not enough good content. If they had waited a few months, fixed some of the bugs and been able to get some of the ppl who would at that time be getting a bit tired of the new wow expansion they could have had a very successful mmo but they launched just before a wow expansion with a buggy game so once the expansion game out, war just started hemoraging players as they went to check out wow
 

Arec Balrin

New member
Feb 26, 2010
137
0
0
Funny he should make that comment about the launch, seeing as Warhammer had the most successful and smoothest launch ever and Mythic wouldn't stop reminding us for two weeks afterwards.

I went back and tried it when they made the first levels free-to-play. The performance issues are gone; shame the main problem for me was the infestation of PvEers and the neglect of world-PvP which was so WoW-like. Almost all PvP was confined to instances, like WoW and for all Mythic's platitudes: I didn't see their heart in it and they weren't taking the instancing VS world-PvP/RvR seriously.
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
Glad to see it is...nothing worse than hanging onto something dead