Michael Bay Vigorously Denies Claims of 3D Problems on Next Transformers Movie

Logan Westbrook

Transform, Roll Out, Etc
Feb 21, 2008
17,672
0
0
Michael Bay Vigorously Denies Claims of 3D Problems on Next Transformers Movie

The Transformers: Dark Side of the Moon director claims that his movie pushes the boundaries of 3D film making.

Don't say anything bad about the 3D in the new Transformers movie, or else you might end up with an angry director breathing down your neck. Michael Bay has defended the 3D effects in Dark Side of the Moon, after a article claimed that they wouldn't be up to snuff.

According the insider sources, the article [http://thefilmstage.com/2010/11/26/transformers-the-dark-of-3d-is-michael-bays-latest-in-post-production-troubles/] said, only 40 minutes or so of the movie were actually shot using 3D cameras, while the rest was shot with 2D cameras and converted in post production. The article also claimed that despite having some of the most talented 3D effects people around, Bay's trademark fast and shaky directing style had caused problems, as it didn't lend itself well to filming in 3D.

Bay refuted [http://www.shootfortheedit.com/forum/showthread.php?8117-UPDATED-Is-Michael-Bay%92s-TF3-In-Post-Production-Troubles&p=153623#post153623] the article's claims, calling the writer an "idiot" and saying that not only did he film the whole thing in 3D, Dark Side of the Moon pushed the boundaries of 3D film making. Bay added that he loved shooting in 3D, and would provide a detailed account of the filming process in the week before the first trailer hit theaters next month. As a postscript to his denial, he said that moviegoers shouldn't watch the movie in 2D at all, because he made the movie for 3D.

It's a very strong denial, but Bay isn't about to hop onto his forums and say, "Yep, the 3D sucks, I should never have bothered with it." It may not matter whether the 3D is any good however, because, as the article suggests, it might be a mixed bag with Bay's directing style. The fight scenes between the Transformers, for example, are chaotic enough without having things coming out of the screen at you.

But whether Bay is being totally honest about the 3D or not, it seems very unlikely that the accusations of less-than-stellar 3D are going to hurt the movie at the box office. If the performance of the previous movie are anything to go by - $200 million in just five days [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/92742-Revenge-of-the-Fallen-Makes-200-Million], without 3D and having received some very negative reviews - then Dark Side of the Moon will pretty much just siphon cash straight out of people's wallets.

Transformer: Dark Side of the Moon opens in theaters on July 1st.

Source: via Coming Soon [http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=71932]


Permalink
 

el_kabong

Shark Rodeo Champion
Mar 18, 2010
540
0
0
So, I get to see Transformers butchered in mediocre 3D now? awesome...

And apparently, he wanted to ruin my love of Pink Floyd, too, by associating the title of one of their best albums with this movie.

I think Micheal Bay is out to make me miserable. What's his next project? Maybe a crappy Dungeons and Dragons movie where the party consists of my ex-girlfriend, Ludacris, Mandy Moore, and Tyler Perry. And the music is provided by Justin Bieber covering punk rock classics...in 3D...screenplay by George Lucas.

I threw up a little bit just thinking about it.
 

Glamorgan

Seer of Light
Aug 16, 2009
3,124
0
0
Hmmm... After this films release, I seriously doubt that 3d will be the worst of his problems.

Baboom tish

I am really starting to dislike this guy. Well, the film will suck anyway, and I have no intention of watching it.
 

shadyh8er

New member
Apr 28, 2010
1,778
0
0
I started losing brain cells when he called the writer an idiot. Who the hell does that guy think he is? (Bay, not the writer!)
 

Dead_Man

New member
Nov 18, 2009
271
0
0
His movies suck, his robots suck, he sucks! Why can't he just take his own titles advice and go to the dark side of the moon.
 

thedoclc

New member
Jun 24, 2008
445
0
0
GeneticallyModifiedDucks said:
castlewise said:
Wait, there is another transformers movie? WHHHYYYYY :(
That was my first reaction as well. Well, at least I know now where I won't be July 1st.
Money dear boy/girl. The others made an enormous profit. Transformers movies will keep getting green-lighted as long as they remain completely bankable, and right now, Optimus Prime is as bankable a star as some kind of unholy cross between Brad Pit, Harrison Ford, and Megan Fox.
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Please stop pushing 3D on us, Hollywood! It sucks and serves no purpose. It's a gimmick that you're using to milk more money out of us, but it ads nothing to the experience. Making movies with good stories and compelling characters is more important than whether or not things look like they are going to hit me in the face. Leave 3D for really bad horror movies where it belongs.

As for this movie, I could probably live without it. No real opinion on it.
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
The only way I'd see this film in cinemas is if someone gave me a ticket for free. I refuse to pay money for this cinematic travesty and I would hope that people are starting to catch onto it now.

Somehow I doubt it though.
 

Spencer Petersen

New member
Apr 3, 2010
598
0
0
First, Dark Side of the Moon? Seriously, that subtitle sucks, and I'm pretty sure its just so people will associate the movie with something not worth a pile of shit.

Second, I thought Bay was vehemently anti-3D? Well I guess he'll sink to any depth when someone tells him that he can market his shit for an extra 2 bucks a ticket. Way to stick to your guns.

Third, Transformers in 3D would probably have sounded like a joke before I heard it was serious, because that's all we need, head-ache inducing 3 hour long incomprehensible bullshit with shitty comic relief, stupid sappy love subplots with un-relatable characters, a new Megan Fox doppelganger to sell the movie to guys going "man shes so hot, id hit that!", all whored out for product placement and slapped with a PG-13 so that Bay can make more money by marketing to children, all coming into the 3rd dimension from the American Uwe Bole.
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
if anyone pays to see this crap after 2 well i lose any slim hope in humanity i had left, i saw 2 for free when it was hbo preview weekend or something and i wanted the two hours of my life back even then.

bay should be shot for number 2 and why he got the go ahead to make the 3rd after the 2nd was savaged by critics and the fans, if hollywood thinks this movie is a lock for 200 mil i pray they are wrong and this movie does nothing.
 

ComicsAreWeird

New member
Oct 14, 2010
1,007
0
0
After Shitformers 2 : Revenge of Linkin Park got out, Bay lost all credibility as a filmmaker.
His shooting style is too agressive and shakey for 3D. Great 3D needs LESS consecutive cuts so the human eye can adjust to the deph of the image, which is also something that Bay usually screws up.They should take time to get the story right first.

OT: It´s Transformers:The Dark of the Moon (stupid title,i know). The Dark Side of the Moon would enrage Pink Floyd Fans ;)