British Government Proposes Universal Ban on Net Porn

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
British Government Proposes Universal Ban on Net Porn


The U.K. government plans to ask internet service providers in the country to restrict access to pornographic websites by default and only make them available to customers who specifically request it.

Next week, representatives from major U.K. ISPs including Virgin Media [http://www.bt.com/] will meet with Minister of Communications Ed Vaizey to discuss a plan to impose a universal block of porn sites right across the country, enabling adult content only for those customers who specifically request it. That's right, if you live in the U.K. and this actually goes through, the only way you'll be able to look at the boobs online is to go on record with your internet provider admitting that you are, in fact, a porn hound.

The idea was the brainchild of Conservative MP Claire Perry, who used the classic "as a mother" line to open her call for greater regulation of the internet. "We already successfully regulate British TV channels, cinema screens, high street hoardings and newsagent shelves to stop children seeing inappropriate images and mobile phone companies are able to restrict access to adult material so why should the Internet be any different?" she said. "British Internet Service Providers should share the responsibility to keep our children safe so I am calling for ISPs to offer an 'Opt In' system that uses age verification to access pornographic material."

It's kind of a crazy idea, but not so crazy that Vaizey didn't latch onto it, telling the Sunday Times [http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/], "This is a very serious matter. I think it is very important that the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) come up with solutions to protect children. I am hoping they will get their acts together so we don't have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years."

The basics of the government's plan are simple enough: all internet connections in the U.K. would be set to block pornographic sites by default and anyone who wants access to them will have to ask for it. But the devil is in the details, as they say, such as defining what constitutes explicit material, which sites should be blocked and how to go about blocking them in a way that tech-savvy kids won't be able to bypass in about ten minutes flat.

While TalkTalk and Virgin Media reps came across as willing to toe the government line, Nicholas Lansman of the U.K.'s Tumblr [http://www.ispa.org.uk/], which sometimes carry adult content.

"This is the wrong way to go. If the government controlled a web blacklist, you can bet that Wikileaks would be on it," said Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group [http://www.openrightsgroup.org/]. "This is not about pornography, it is about generalized censorship through the back door."

Sources: TechRadar UK [http://blogs.forbes.com/parmyolson/2010/12/20/porn-ban-proposal-uk-isp-virgin-media-criticism/?boxes=Homepagechannels]


Permalink
 

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
I'm all for not educating minors on titties, but this I don't buy. This may sound bitter, but I'm really looking forward to the time when most of the "think of the children" crowd is six-feet under.
 

Motiv_

New member
Jun 2, 2009
851
0
0
I'm getting tired of all this "Protect the children" bullshit. You know who should be protecting the children? The parents. Not the government, the bloody people who had them in the first place!
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
"British Government Proposes Universal Ban on Net Porn"

Yeah, they just want to make sure we pay for it.
 

MurderousToaster

New member
Aug 9, 2008
3,074
0
0
I'm sorry, but this is beyond retarded if you look at the parents' point of view. In order to get on a porn website, the child A: Needs to deliberately turn the search filters off (Safesearch on Google, etc.) or B: Know the URL. If parents are finding that their child is on pornographic sites, it's deliberate and the child is most likely just lying about accidentally stumbling across it to get out of trouble.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
I honestly didn't think I was able to hate the Conservative Government any more than I already did. Seriously, these people put Michael motherfucking Gove as the education secretary, they turn the Lib Dems into nothing more than their Morality Pet for the masses, Student Loan rises, what amounts to health care privitisation, these things are not evidence of an economic solution to our countrie's problems they are indicitive of an overall mindset not suited to this day and age.

And this is just more of the same. The Conservatives do not seem to understand anything about anyone who wasn't born with a fucking silver spoon in their mouth. They are primped, prissy, ivory tower Oxbridge graduating fuckskulls who have not the slightest grasp on reality of any sort.

Not only am I pissed about this from the standpoint of general control of the populace, but I am deeply worried about the ramifications of the government having direct access to your internet preferences, which should scare anyone with half a brain.

Fuck the Conservatives, fuck all their ministers, and fuck their old-man government which dreams of a rose-tinted past we never. FUCKING. HAD!
 

LightspeedJack

New member
May 2, 2010
1,478
0
0
Sad days. Like the man says, parent can impose their own filters to choose what their children can and cannot look at, there is no reason for the government to be doing their parenting for them. And just as Killock said, this will lead to more censorship, Wikileaks will be gone as will an site with anti-establishment messages. Call me paranoid but this act marks the slow death of the free internet we know. And plus I won't be able to see boobs any more :(
 

CoverYourHead

High Priest of C'Thulhu
Dec 7, 2008
2,514
0
0
Parents should be in charge of protecting their own children, not try to pass the job onto the government and end up making everyone else's life more difficult or annoying. Glad I don't live in the UK, with their government trying to treat the country like children.

Of course, it'll probably catch on in the US eventually...
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
the only way you'll be able to look at the boobs online is to go on record with your internet provider admitting that you are, in fact, a porn hound.
I thought that people freely admitted to this anyways?
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
If no one minds, I'm going to post the same rant I put on Facebook when I heard about the anime/manga censoring thing.

*ahem*

I am so sick of governments using censorship with the goal of "protecting the children". Seriously, it is not the government's job to do that. It's the job of parents to monitor what their children play and watch, and not treat the TV like a babysitter. And don't even try the "I'm too busy to monitor my kids" argument.... If you're too busy for kids, you shouldn't have had them in the first place. Wakarimasu ka?
 

Mana Fiend

New member
Jun 8, 2009
687
0
0
Erm yes, because with the current economic climite, the thing we need to do is put in complex and no doubt expensive methods to try censor something that, at the end of the day, is not the importance of the government, but the parents.

Seriously, children have been able to get ahold of pornography for eons before the internet. The old comedian's joke about finding porn in bushes in parks is not far from the truth. Seriously, government - if this is what you raised tuition fees and cut education funding to do, you're idiots.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
I agree that this is definitely less about porn specifically and more about control in general. The top reason anyone uses the Internet for anything (last I checked) was for pornography, so... If practically everyone (including, possibly, these lawmakers?) is looking at it, why work so hard to ban it as a default option? Control, of course! Ban anything with "adult" content you say, well what constitutes "adult" content. Anything the lawmakers don't like, naturally! The great thing about "explicit" content bans is that every forum has had such content at some point whether they wanted it or not, and many websites toe the line or cross over from time to time.

Also, the process for requesting one's adult Internet back might be a time-consuming run-around, especially when you consider it would probably be a government system. We all know how fast and easy THOSE are.
 

Fuselage

New member
Nov 18, 2009
932
0
0
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.251729-UK-Government-to-block-porn#9342121
I knew it, What did all the naysayers say?
"How could an AUSTRALIAN new site know this?"
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Fuck protecting the children, I refuse to allow my country or any other turn into a fucking nanny state just before parents are too damn lazy to take care of their little drooling pest's, not us or the government. I'll be glad when the "Think of the Children!" crowd is old and dead....

OT: This won't end well, just you watch. I'm pretty sure we tried something like this here in the US with booze and the mob ended up have an iron clad grip of the place for a while....
 

SuperCombustion

New member
Aug 10, 2010
209
0
0
this is just the thin end of the wedge, first its internet porn, then its violent images, then its anything not sanctioned by the board.
WONT SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!
I am... Give them some free will...