Flawed Diamonds May Be the Key to Quantum Computing

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
Flawed Diamonds May Be the Key to Quantum Computing

A new process for creating qubits using flawed diamonds and lasers could lead to quantum computers and impossible-to-hack networks.

As it turns out, the most useful diamonds are the kind that nobody wants, as a new way of manipulating nitrogen atoms inside of flawed diamonds may allow for large scale, room temperature quantum computers.

"Oddly enough, perfection may not be the way to go," said the University of California, Santa Barbara's David Awschalom. "We want to build in defects."

The difference between quantum and normal computing is the number of different states each can utilize. In traditional computing, the smallest form of information is the bit, which can represent either a 1 or a 0, while a qubit, the unit used for quantum computing, can represent a 1, a 0, or both at the same time.

Awschalom's new technique uses diamonds that have been flawed by the inclusion of nitrogen in their carbon matrices. When a nitrogen atom lies next to an empty space in the carbon matrix, it fills it by putting one of its electrons in that spot. By playing with the "spin" of the the nitrogen atom and electron, the pair effectively becomes a stable qubit, capable of lasting much longer at room temperature than other forms of creating qubits, which are often very unstable and require temperatures near absolute zero.

The spins of the particles may be measured and changed with lasers, and can be changed at about the same speed as a traditional computer can write information to a stick of RAM. The qubit only exists for seconds at best, but in the realm of computing, that can be more than enough time to perform some extreme calculations.

Another use of Awschalom's diamond qubits might be using them as quantum repeaters. Currently, quantum networks can be created by "entangling" particles, which then can transmit secure data over several kilometers via quantum encryption. Using chips of diamond in repeaters could significantly extend the range of these networks of impossible-to-decrypt information.

Room temperature quantum computers and unhackable networks might sound a bit far-fetched and futuristic, and that's because they are. Yet here we are, on the verge of their existence.

Isn't living in the future fun?

Source: ScienceNews [http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/71588/title/Diamond_could_store_quantum_information]

Permalink
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
QUANTUM COMPUTERS FUCK YES.

Sorry, but I've been wanting a reason to shout that for a long time. Quantum computers are one of those things on my list of "Amazing things in the future that I want to see before I die."
 

Ellen of Kitten

New member
Nov 30, 2010
461
0
0
I'll take two futures, please. :)

I can already see it now; peoples computers being stolen... for diamonds. Heists of armored trucks just so Anonomous can build personal Quantum Computers. Movies, popularizing these feats!

I like. :)
 

Nincompoop

New member
May 24, 2009
1,035
0
0
I would not guess this development would reach The Escapist. This is most impressive.
 

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
I tried to find a way to fit this into the article, but I just couldn't do it. Instead, I shall grace the comments section with it.

"The Computer is now Diamonds!"
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Scott Bullock said:
Flawed Diamonds May Be the Key to Quantum Computing
I heartily approve of your juxtapositions of serious and funny.

Of course, what do you do with a 30 Terabyte Quantum Harddrive after you've downloaded everything on Steam and a few specialist interest videos? And who's gonna be the first to put Bejeweled on diamonds?
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
I see they bypassed the Schlock Mercenary-noted naming problem [http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2003-03-23] for the "qubit"... I wonder how the move to this new system of computing will happen - a port of current software, or brand new development?
 

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Scott Bullock said:
Flawed Diamonds May Be the Key to Quantum Computing
I heartily approve of your juxtapositions of serious and funny.

Of course, what do you do with a 30 Terabyte Quantum Harddrive after you've downloaded everything on Steam and a few specialist interest videos? And who's gonna be the first to put Bejeweled on diamonds?
You proceed to download the internet.

ALL of it.
 

RicoGrey

New member
Oct 27, 2009
296
0
0
They can actually make diamonds, so stealing them won't be as much of an issue

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_diamond

also 80% of all diamonds mined are not suitable for jewelry, so the price of diamonds use in industrial applications are a lot lower, since there is 4 times the supply.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamonds#Industrial_uses
 

V8 Ninja

New member
May 15, 2010
1,903
0
0
At this rate, I expect the discovery of modifiable DNA to happen in the next 2 years. Japan would go nuts over that.
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
In traditional computing, the smallest form of information is the bit, which can represent either a 1 or a 0, while a qubit, the unit used for quantum computing, can represent a 1, a 0, or both at the same time.
I'll go ahead and come up with a name for this new third state... "Two".
I know there's probalby some major difference from quantum computing and a base 3 numeric system that i'm not getting.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Yay.
Just one question...
How much are we expected to pay for theese?
More than this probably.
 

SnowGrog

New member
May 10, 2010
2
0
0
insanelich said:
Impossible-to-hack now?

Yeah, no more so than current ones.
Yeah, cause they're still built by people.

Now for the encryption side... most references I've seen to quantum encryption are actually in reference to encoding.

(And don't forget about the speculation that quantum computing will allow anything to be decrypted immediately.)
 

TheGuy(wantstobe)

New member
Dec 8, 2009
430
0
0
esperandote said:
In traditional computing, the smallest form of information is the bit, which can represent either a 1 or a 0, while a qubit, the unit used for quantum computing, can represent a 1, a 0, or both at the same time.
I'll go ahead and come up with a name for this new third state... "Two".
I know there's probalby some major difference from quantum computing and a base 3 numeric system that i'm not getting.
Think schrodinger's cat instead of numeracy :p. The third state isn't a unique, distinct thing but rather both of the possible states occuring at the same time on the same bit.
 

Piflik

New member
Feb 25, 2010
255
0
0
Hmm...that's not too new, though...I held a presentation on that topic some two years ago at my university...