THQ in Legal Trouble for Poaching Ubisoft Staff

Tom Goldman

Crying on the inside.
Aug 17, 2009
14,499
0
0
THQ in Legal Trouble for Poaching Ubisoft Staff



An injunction has been granted against THQ due to the company's aggressive poaching of Ubisoft's workforce.

In June 2010, longtime Ubisoft employee and creative director of leading his own team [http://www.amazon.com/Assassins-Creed-Brotherhood-Xbox-360/dp/B003L8HQ7S/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1301586736&sr=8-3] at THQ Montreal, an Ubisoft competitor. Désilets' move appeared to be contractually legal, but multiple hires moving to his team from Ubisoft have landed THQ in hot water with the Canadian legal system.

Ubisoft confirmed to Game Informer that it was granted an injunction against THQ due to the fact that THQ hasn't been complying with the non-solicit clauses in the contracts of Ubisoft Montreal's employees. After Désilets departure from Ubisoft, Assassin's Creed artistic director Alex Drouin, production manager Mark Besner, and associate producer Jean-Francois Boivin also mysteriously resigned from Ubisoft, a trio that were close enough to Désilets to share Montreal Canadiens season tickets. It was later revealed that the three were improperly hired by THQ Montreal, which a court recognized when it granted a first injunction against THQ at the request of Ubisoft.

Still, THQ persisted, and had former Ubisoft employee Adolfo Gomez-Urda approach current Ubisoft employee Margherita Seconnino with an offer to work at THQ with as much as a 60% raise. In light of this persistence, the Superior Court of Québec has granted a second injunction to prevent THQ from continuing on with its actions. The injunction now involves Gomez-Urda, Désilets, and THQ.

Ubisoft Montreal says that it's trying to protect its "long-term financial and creative health." Maybe these kinds of moves are just what go on in the corporate world, but this situation makes it seem like there's some serious videogame employee espionage going on in Montreal. Assassin's Creed must have really rubbed off on its creators.

Source: Game Informer [http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/03/30/ubisoft-obtains-injunction-preventing-thq-from-poaching-talent.aspx]

Permalink
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
shintakie10 said:
AC10 said:
So people can't leave a company for a better offer anymore?
Not if they're contractually obligated to stay at the place they're at.
However, the only infringement THQ is in trouble for is with the non-solicit clauses. No one was contractually obliged to never quit Ubisoft.

What if they quit, then got an offer? How will Ubisoft be able to prove this wasn't the case?
 

ThreeKneeNick

New member
Aug 4, 2009
741
0
0
Ubisoft employees can make choices for themselves, however if THQ is specifically targeting Ubisoft rather than just plain old offering better conditions all round, than they should stop.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
OH SHIT.

I hope these lawsuits don't affect THQ's release schedule for 2011. I want my Saint's Row and Red Faction.

It sounds like THQ didn't go through proper procedure, if I'm reading this right.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
AC10 said:
shintakie10 said:
AC10 said:
So people can't leave a company for a better offer anymore?
Not if they're contractually obligated to stay at the place they're at.
However, the only infringement THQ is in trouble for is with the non-solicit clauses. No one was contractually obliged to never quit Ubisoft.

What if they quit, then got an offer? How will Ubisoft be able to prove this wasn't the case?
Hmmm...point.

If THQ actually defends itself then Ubisoft doesnt have much a case legally speakin because of pretty much what you just said. An injunction like the one that was put against THQ is pretty easy to get, but also easy to get around for your stated reason. It'd end up bein one of those cases where everyone knows that THQ is poachin, but there isnt enough evidence to prove it.
 

NicoDK

New member
Sep 21, 2009
154
0
0
This better not end in a crappy sequel to brotherhood, that cliffhanger was just too much.
 

ShadowKatt

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,410
0
0
shintakie10 said:
AC10 said:
So people can't leave a company for a better offer anymore?
Not if they're contractually obligated to stay at the place they're at.
Indentured Servitude anyone?

And I thought "At-will" work states were criminal...
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
My sense of outrage is being dulled by the fact that I'm much more interested in Saints Row 3 than I am in anything in the Assassin's Creed line.
 

Celtic_Kerr

New member
May 21, 2010
2,166
0
0
AC10 said:
shintakie10 said:
AC10 said:
So people can't leave a company for a better offer anymore?
Not if they're contractually obligated to stay at the place they're at.
However, the only infringement THQ is in trouble for is with the non-solicit clauses. No one was contractually obliged to never quit Ubisoft.

What if they quit, then got an offer? How will Ubisoft be able to prove this wasn't the case?
There are clauses like that where I work. If I quit, I cannot solicit the people here to work for a direct competitor. It's one thing if The Ubisoft employees walk up to THQ and say "What can you give me?", it's another when THQ specifically targets Ubisoft and makes offers to steal their employers
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,902
9,589
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Well, if Gomez-Urda was dressed up as a court jester, I suppose we'll know what was going on....

Still, this is hardly limited to the gaming sector. With the jobs market being as terrible as it is, some companies are actively recruiting their competition's workforce in order to weaken them. Instead of, you know, offering jobs to those poor unemployed schlubs out there who actually need them.

Screwed-up world these days, I'm tellin' ya.
 

DeaconSawyer

New member
Aug 19, 2010
84
0
0
I wonder if they aren't all leaving because of Brotherhood. I mean the story in that was so poorly put together I can't imagine that they had much say in it. Quitting because their baby was so destroyed seem valid, and would account for why the AC:B story was so patchy and bad, albeit with far better gameplay.
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
I don't even know why "non-solicitation" and "non-compete" clauses in contracts are even recognised as legal in most countries, to me they reek of anti-competitiveness.

Don't want your employees leaving for another company? Treat them better, either with extra money, or better goodies.

Don't want someone who left you competing against you? Tough nuggets.

I hate this "companies have rights" BS. People have rights, not companies.