NASA Grounds Richard Garriott's Sci-Fi Film

WMDogma

New member
Jul 28, 2009
1,374
0
0
NASA Grounds Richard Garriott's Sci-Fi Film

NASA keeps the first science fiction movie to be filmed on location in space under wraps.

A documentary titled Man on a Mission recently opened to theaters, detailing multi-millionaire game designer Richard "Lord British" Garriott's $30 million USD expedition to visit the International Space Station. While enjoying the view of Earth from roughly 400 kilometers up, Garriott also worked with the station's crew to produce a short, fictional sci-fi film, shot entirely in lower Earth orbit.

The short film, titled Apogee of Fear, stars real-life NASA astronauts Mike Fincke and Greg Chamitoff along with Cosmonaut Yuri Lonchakov investigating a "possible alien intruder" shortly after Garriott departs the International Space Station to return to Earth. However, outside of one or two private viewings hosted by Garriott himself, NASA has refused to allow any public viewing of the film.

NASA hasn't given any particular reason why it's withholding a public release of Apogee, though Garriott believes that it might be "too playful" for NASA's tastes. However, there has been some growing demand to see the film from organizations like the Smithsonian Institute, which has requested a copy to have for its archives.

Source: SPACE.com [http://www.space.com/14234-1st-scifi-movie-space-nasa-garriott.html]


Permalink
 

HobbesMkii

Hold Me Closer Tony Danza
Jun 7, 2008
856
0
0
NASA hasn't had much of a sense of humor ever since they got all that crap for crashing that probe into Mars.
 

AdamG3691

New member
Nov 18, 2009
313
0
0
they're not letting it be shown because it's not science fiction, it's science FACT!
*dun DUN DUUUUNNNNN*
 

Mrsoupcup

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,487
0
0
Sounds like a fun film, but I have a sad feeling I may never get a chance to see it. :(

[small]On a side note: WERE THE FUCK DOES GARRIOT GET ALL THIS MONEY?!?[/small]
 

DrakeLake

New member
Apr 5, 2010
12
0
0
I can imagine that film being released and getting criticized for being made in the first place. "We're wasting money making stupid films in space!"

:(
 

tsb247

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,783
0
0
I don't see how this movie could hurt anyone. I'm curious as to what NASA is thinking here.
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
As crazy as Garriott can be, he's at least done humanity a service and made the first space-based movie be a nice little B-movie, with amateur actors and no doubt cheap special effects. Because if someone didn't get this out of the way, then you know the first movie filmed in space would be a porno, and the last thing we need is the Smithsonian enshrining something called "Masturspacetion" or "Zero G Spot" as a first for cinema history.
 

OneTwoThreeBlast

New member
Jun 24, 2010
77
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
As crazy as Garriott can be, he's at least done humanity a service and made the first space-based movie be a nice little B-movie, with amateur actors and no doubt cheap special effects. Because if someone didn't get this out of the way, then you know the first movie filmed in space would be a porno, and the last thing we need is the Smithsonian enshrining something called "Masturspacetion" or "Zero G Spot" as a first for cinema history.
Holy shit, this is awesome. Congratulations Sir/Madam; you have won the Internets for today.

Anyway, I have to think NASA is just being a bunch of dicks. Surely there's no big technological secrets in a vehicle that's merely in lower earth orbit. What the hell could they possibly be hiding?

Maybe they just don't want people to see horrendous acting? I'm not saying the acting is horrendous, but if that's the case, I can kind of (kind of!) see why NASA wouldn't want the public to view it. Everyone will just end up talking about how bad our astronauts are in the film.
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
Could be because NASA doesn't want stupid people to think it's real. Wasn't there a press release from them telling people there were no aliens on the moon because of some shitty horror movie that wasn't even shot in space? People believe anything and NASA might not want to deal with it.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
Sounds like a fun film, but I have a sad feeling I may never get a chance to see it. :(

[small]On a side note: WERE THE FUCK DOES GARRIOT GET ALL THIS MONEY?!?[/small]
He basically invented MMOs, I'd be surprised if he didn't have a swimming pool of cash to play with.
 

Mrsoupcup

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,487
0
0
Agayek said:
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
Sounds like a fun film, but I have a sad feeling I may never get a chance to see it. :(

[small]On a side note: WERE THE FUCK DOES GARRIOT GET ALL THIS MONEY?!?[/small]
He basically invented MMOs, I'd be surprised if he didn't have a swimming pool of cash to play with.
Does that mean every MMO Dev/Publisher has to pay him royalties?

If so he probably has a fountain of liquid gold.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
Does that mean every MMO Dev/Publisher has to pay him royalties?

If so he probably has a fountain of liquid gold.
I have absolutely no idea. All I know is he owns the rights to the Ultima franchise (or did last I checked), and was the first MMO, in the modern sense. He likely has patents or copyrights or whatever on a number of concepts/technologies used by modern games to perform as they do.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
tsb247 said:
I don't see how this movie could hurt anyone. I'm curious as to what NASA is thinking here.
Inside of the space station. Prolly machines and stuff in the background they don't want other countries to see.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
I don't suppose there is a chance it could be leaked somehow? Maybe if someone involved "loses it" on a train or something, next to a conviniently placed journalist.