The_root_of_all_evil said:
Korten12 said:
I love how people sterotype COD fans on this forum.
but the people calling them that are acting like bigger idiots.
Irony. It bites back.
Ironic? No. Let's see, half of the people in this thread said that people who buy this are idiots. And yet, the majority of Elite is absoulutely free, and by free its on par with BattleLog and Bungie.Net.
So no, it's not ironic. It's fucking fact on this forum.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Korten12 said:
I'm ice cold. Always am when posting. Helps perspective.
2. Everyone gives out for free..? What? Last time I checked almost all DLC, besdies Valve, isn't free.
Most of it is on the PC. That's why we quite like it.
Many DLC on PC is free.
Also I am not sure it's all the COD's (I know you get Black Ops free) but I think everything up from BLOPs for free but I can't confirm this.
It's not, is it though? It even says MW3 only.
Elite works for Blops. But maybe the DLC is only for MW3+ which is where Elite is actually going to start from so it doesn't really matter.
3. So you pay $110 for a year... Thats about $10 less then buying two games.
First mistake. Two AAA games. Anything else...much cheaper.
Who says they want to play those cheaper games? I could not get Dark Souls for $60 and buy a bunch of cheaper games. But do I want to? Hell no.
So a person who only plays COD, will get there money's worth.
That's an atrocious argument. How do you define money's worth to someone with only one game? How many people do you know who ONLY play CoD?
I don't personally, but the thing is. That people who don't only play COD, at lot of them are going to put hundreds and hundreds of hours into it. Thus making it worth there money.
Since they get all the DLC free
So the DLC quality is worthless now? You're getting it whether it's any good or not? You remember the furor about other map packs? How only a few are actually useful?
What? This makes no fucking sense... You buy Elite not just for the DLC, but for EXTRA features. Also what the fuck does quality even matter in this arguemet?
3. Those are MMO's of the F2P genre, completely different to this. None that you mentioned are a FPS. I get what you're trying to say, but it doesn't really work.
Ok then; Global Agenda, Tribes, Unreal Tournament, Killing Floor, TF2...That's still less than your money.
Problem with this is that you ASSUME as if fact that they will want to play them. Yes you can play them for cheaper, but NOT EVERYONE will want to play them. You don't seem to understand this. Some people like COD, I know that is hard for lots of you to understand, but people find fun in COD.
4. Yahtzee's reviews for the most part are for fun, not really a review.
I'll let you defend that one.
5. A group for Spawn Campers? They already do that on forums I bet so no difference where it is.
Yeah, why bother to make a map fair and balanced when all the people who pay it get to know where all the best spots are - so they can zoom to the top of the TOTALLY FAIR table.
*Face palm* Now this is just getting silly. You get to see the overhead of the maps ANYWAY. Plus there is also many other ways in almost ALL FPS to see where the best spots. Make a private match and go around the map.
6. You don't need to buy it. Last time I checked, you can buy MW3, never buy the DLC or Elite and can still perfectly enjoy the game.[/quote]
But if people want all the extras, they can buy them all, no matter how much they're worth.
And you can also enjoy WoW without the Burning Crusade or Wrath of the Lich King.
But not if you want to actually play it seriously.[/quote]
The whole WoW part is competely pointless since that's not a SERVICE but expansion packs. A whole different thing.
Also that's the whole fucking point of EXTRAs.
Plus you can most likely still play serious since there is many FREE services.
I'll say again:
[HEADING=3]You're specifically defending the idea that it's perfectly acceptable to charge players based on their need, rather than the quality of your game?[/HEADING]
Yes or No?
If Yes, then I'll say no more. You've made your choice.
If No, then you're defending the prices based on it's cheaper to buy everything up front.
Mathematically, you're still on shaky ground because of interest. Economically, you've just given Activision free reign to sell you half a game for a full game's price.
And @Rednog, "Seriously"? Opinions are open, but charging for a service that could be atrocious is the same day 1 DLC that crippled Portal 2. It's hardly a new call.
I am not even going to bother answering seeing as you basically made it:
If you agree with me, your good, if you don't, your stupid.