Huh and i thought Unicron would have been a great investment considering that Unicron would eat or smash planets to tiny little pieces of space dust.
and none to spend on medicine apparently.TypeSD said:I love how the US has all this money to spend on useless reports.Marshall Honorof said:bazinga
You do know it was a joke article?TypeSD said:I love how the US has all this money to spend on useless reports.Marshall Honorof said:bazinga
I sincerely doubt this required a significant investment.TypeSD said:I love how the US has all this money to spend on useless reports.Marshall Honorof said:bazinga
Hey? I thought it was moon sized? Ah, well, a "mere" 120km across makes more sense, but is still really stupid.SirBryghtside said:I just did the maths, and it comes to a millionth
The original death star was, according to Google, 120 km in Diameter. That means the volume is 904,778 km[sup]3[/sup]. Star Destroyers are, in comparison, around 0.8 km[sup]3[/sup] - obtained by multiplying 1.6*1*0.5. that means you can fit around 1,130,972 Star Destroyers into the Death Star.
...I'm never going to get that time back...
Why bother? Aliens already did that to Mars and Mercury.thaluikhain said:Um...no. It might be small for a moon, but unbelievably huge compared to a spaceship. Even the impractically large Super Star Destroyer would be less than a trillionth its size. A trillion super Star Destroyers (ok, i'd go for regular star destroyers, and they are too big themselves) would be a much better investment than one big ship.Shoggoth2588 said:I think The Death Star would be a much more practical investment if it was used as a deep-space exploration vessel instead of a mobile planet-destroying monstrosity.
I mean, think about it. It can travel through the Galaxy, holding years worth of rations and enough people to populate any suitable planet while the Deathstar helpfully orbits said planet to keep an eye on things. Man can travel pretty freely from Earth to the Moon so taking a moon-sized space station and sending it to any given Earth-like planet would be a pretty safe bet I'd think. You know, once we can get our own version of FTL travel or, finish our own version of the Hyper-Drive.
It would still be expensive as hell but using the station as an exploration vessel could potentially pay off in a HUGE way.
Though, why bother building one? Why not just build the engines on an existing moon and fly it around if you want?
Er... what happens when you add a random moon to a planet again?Shoggoth2588 said:I think The Death Star would be a much more practical investment if it was used as a deep-space exploration vessel instead of a mobile planet-destroying monstrosity.
I mean, think about it. It can travel through the Galaxy, holding years worth of rations and enough people to populate any suitable planet while the Deathstar helpfully orbits said planet to keep an eye on things. Man can travel pretty freely from Earth to the Moon so taking a moon-sized space station and sending it to any given Earth-like planet would be a pretty safe bet I'd think. You know, once we can get our own version of FTL travel or, finish our own version of the Hyper-Drive.
It would still be expensive as hell but using the station as an exploration vessel could potentially pay off in a HUGE way.
To be fair, the F-22 is pretty much the God of airplanes.BabySinclair said:C-130, B-52, A-10. Really old planes that are still used because the bloody work. New technology is good, but should be tested and proven small scale before ramping up production (F22/35)
Yeah true, it would be kinda like that movie 'Titan AD'. Problem is, we would HAVE to name the ships "Death Stars". And that just gives the wrong impression.Shoggoth2588 said:I think The Death Star would be a much more practical investment if it was used as a deep-space exploration vessel instead of a mobile planet-destroying monstrosity.
I mean, think about it. It can travel through the Galaxy, holding years worth of rations and enough people to populate any suitable planet while the Deathstar helpfully orbits said planet to keep an eye on things. Man can travel pretty freely from Earth to the Moon so taking a moon-sized space station and sending it to any given Earth-like planet would be a pretty safe bet I'd think. You know, once we can get our own version of FTL travel or, finish our own version of the Hyper-Drive.
It would still be expensive as hell but using the station as an exploration vessel could potentially pay off in a HUGE way.