cjspyres said:
Yes, because a character sprite swaying their hips in a sexual way to flirt with a character is totally a problem that doesn't exist when that character is a child. Especially considering you have to do that to win the game. I mean seriously, whether or not you think the game is good, the creators obviously overlooked these details.
They didn't overlook the detail, you seem to just be reading way more sexuality than they, or most of the fans, interpreted. Also, you want to be a little more specific about who is doing the hip swaying here? It obviously wasn't too obvious, because I've played the game and have no idea what the hell you are referring to at this point.
Just because you see something, doesn't mean everyone else sees the same thing and is just purposely overlooking it.
People can't claim it's just a joke, because that just makes it worse. And despite the fact that "nothing comes of it", you still have a child flirting and going on dates with adults.
Really? flirting and going on a couple of dates with questionably adult characters where nothing happens is not some terrible pedophilic action that requires the comments you seem to think it does, Undertale has nothing that would earn it more than a PG rating if it were a movie. There have been far raunchier interactions between children and adults in all kinds of fiction, Family guy makes it a running joke with Stewie, South Park has definitely done it, and with explicit mentions of sex on top, even the Simpsons has done it in a more explicit fashion than anything in Undertale.
Nobody called those out as pedophilic because most people thought it wasn't, the tone and context was not meant to be sexual, and most audiences buy that as acceptable justification for fiction, that you disagree is fine, but irrelevant.
The reason nobody is calling Undertale out isn't because the makers or fans are missing anything, it seems to be because you are setting the bar for what counts as "pedophilic content" lower than even basic broadcast mainstream American Television.
Do you mean to tell me that if you saw that on reality, you'd just shrug it off?
If Undertale was reality, I would be more concerned about where Frisk's parent's are, but because its fiction, I don't care about his parent's because it would bog the story down, or divert the story being told. What I tolerate in reality has little bearing on what I tolerate in fiction, its not a 1:1 comparison.
You can criticize it if you think its inappropriate, but I doubt you'll find many people here that are going to agree with your assessment. At this point, I think your definition of pedophilic content is just a hell of a lot broader than most peoples.
Really, if the Simpsons can do it without mainstream America calling it out for "pedophilia" then I doubt you'll ever get any large number of people to agree with your assessment on something as innocent as Undertale.