Analysts Suspects EA Will Start Annual Battlefield Releases

Logan Westbrook

Transform, Roll Out, Etc
Feb 21, 2008
17,672
0
0
Analysts Suspects EA Will Start Annual Battlefield Releases


The future could contain a great deal more Battlefield games, if one analyst's predictions are correct.


Janco Partners analyst Mike Hickey thinks that EA may be considering putting the Battlefield series on a annual release schedule, so that it might better compete with Activision's immensely-popular Call of Duty series.

According to Hickey's research note, EA could alternate between the main Battlefield series - which will see its first full-scale update later this year since the release of Battlefield 2 in 2005 - and the Bad Company series. It's not that unreasonable a prediction; EA CEO Frank Riccitiello has made it very clear [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109072-EA-CEO-Battlefield-3-Is-Designed-to-Take-COD-Down] in the past that EA wants to break Activision's grip on the shooter market, and matching it game-for-game could be a step towards that.

It would mean a change in the way that the Battlefield games are made, however. After all, Activision has three studios working solely on CoD: Infinity Ward, Treyarch, and now Sledgehammer Games. DICE couldn't possibly put out a new, triple-A game every year by itself, so EA would have to delegate some of the work to another studio. That could be its Danger Close studio - which previously worked with DICE on Medal of Honor - or some new studio entirely.

All of this is just supposition of course. It's equally possible that EA will just up its marketing efforts for the Battlefield series, but alternate between it and Medal of Honor. There's also Respawn to consider - the studio set up by former Infinity Ward heads Jason West and Vince Zampella - which is also working on a new shooter project. Perhaps EA will elect not to play Activision at its own game, but instead try to change the rules.

Battlefield 3 [http://www.amazon.com/Battlefield-3-Limited-Xbox-360/dp/B003O6G5TW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304946442&sr=8-1] is scheduled to come out later this year.

Source: CVG [http://www.computerandvideogames.com/300588/news/ea-to-annualise-the-battlefield-series/?cid=OTC-RSS&attr=CVG-News-RSS]






Permalink
 

manythings

New member
Nov 7, 2009
3,297
0
0
Will it actually happen or is this "my two cents" no evidence speculation by someone who'll disappear when they are wrong?

Wasn't there a wave of hate for Battlefield 2?
 

Prof.Beany

New member
Apr 22, 2011
81
0
0
Hmmm... More Battlefield is usually a good thing, but I cant help feel the value for money will take a dramatic dive if they do this.

Heres hoping they dont.
 

Avernus

New member
Jun 10, 2009
110
0
0
Ugh, being on that development team sounds like it just got a lot less exciting.
 

WickedFire

New member
Apr 25, 2011
126
0
0
I hope they don't, year-on-year releases would end up stagnating an already over released genre even further. If we had both Activision and EA going head to head on releases it would only serve to push out other developers who want to try other things with the FPS genre.
A greater development time also serves to make the games themselves better. For example, Half Life 2 will be remembered far after COD: Black Ops has become a distant memory for only the most devout COD players.
 

Dr Jones

Join the Bob Dylan Fangroup!
Jun 23, 2010
819
0
0
manythings said:
Will it actually happen or is this "my two cents" no evidence speculation by someone who'll disappear when they are wrong?

Wasn't there a wave of hate for Battlefield 2?
It is someone's two cents. Read the post.
 

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,125
0
0
Im not an analyst. But honestly, I dont think it will come to that. I think when it comes to battlefield Annual releases are saved for spinoffs.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
My condolences go out to the employees of the affected studios.
 

Littaly

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,810
0
0
Gee, what a bold prediction, I bet it took him years of thorough research to reach that conclusion -.-

Seriously though, this seems to be the way to go these days. It's a shame really, in the long run it benefits the publisher a lot more than it does the consumer. Ah well, they've gotta keep that boat floating one way or the other I suppose, stagnation sucks but it's better than bankruptcy...
 

Yoh3333

New member
Feb 7, 2011
159
0
0
Sounds like a horrible decision from EA in my opinion.
If they want to beat CoD they had better not try to follow their fomula of money makeing. Sure it makes more money but it is going to tire the franchise out quicker than otherwise. Quality is what we want after these 3/4 years of CoD dominance.
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
The chances of the COD FPS bubble bursting have just risen dramatically.

Finally! It will END! (or at very least shrivel up into something pathetic that gets laughed at, I'm not picky)
 

Tigurus

New member
Apr 14, 2009
239
0
0
I rather have them making 1 Battlefield in 5 years then 1 every year.
And nobody can defeat COD fanboys/girls. So I rather have quality than some gibberish game which get thrown out of the window a day later.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Hardcore_gamer said:
So Battlefield is now becoming different from Call of Duty only in name?

Just fan fucking fantastic.

I would express my thoughts towards EA right now with words, but you know what they say:

[http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/4/middlefingertl.jpg/]

Yea I know this isn't confirmed or anything. But this is EA we are talking about, so I would not be shocked one bit if this turns out to be totally true.
So you were totally unsuspecting of this possibility until you read this man's purely speculative opinion?
 

Tiswas

New member
Jun 9, 2010
638
0
0
SUSPECTS? It's been going no for a while now.

Battlefield Bad Company 2: 2010
Battlefield 1943 : 2009
Battlefield Bad Company: 2008
Battlefield 2142: Northern Strike: 2007
Battlefield 2142: 2006
Battlefield 2: 2005
Battlefield Vietnam: 2004

I'm sure it goes further back too.