Sorry but I think we need to get some context for that!Bealzibob said:As someone whose has taken a axe spike to the balls I know it's no laughing matter but the media these days pay not attention to the lonely opinion of a battle harden viking.
Sorry but I think we need to get some context for that!Bealzibob said:As someone whose has taken a axe spike to the balls I know it's no laughing matter but the media these days pay not attention to the lonely opinion of a battle harden viking.
I think he's probably joking. After all, look at the rest of the post.ReservoirAngel said:Sorry but I think we need to get some context for that!Bealzibob said:As someone whose has taken a axe spike to the balls I know it's no laughing matter but the media these days pay not attention to the lonely opinion of a battle harden viking.
banana!MammothBlade said:All of this could have been prevented by a safe word.
People can't help their urges. Seems like you've been a little indoctrinated by the media.Altorin said:Relish in Chaos said:Fixed. There's nothing inherently bad about someone being sexually attracted to prepubescent children (which is the literal definition of a paedophile, not the media's), only if they act upon those urges.Altorin said:Roast that woman on a spit as far as I'm concerned, unless it turns out the guy was a child molester or something
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
Wait, what? Then why have I never acted on my urges I had when someone stepped on a nerve too hard?AnarchistFish said:[
People can't help their urges. Seems like you've been a little indoctrinated by the media.
As long as they don't act on them, they shouldn't be demonisedVegosiux said:Wait, what? Then why have I never acted on my urges I had when someone stepped on a nerve too hard?AnarchistFish said:[
People can't help their urges. Seems like you've been a little indoctrinated by the media.
They were really creative urges, too, that involved no harm to their health!
]Shawn MacDonald said:Well thats okay because I would rip off her clit with a rusty spoon. I forgot the old saying, "clit for a ball." Making all these jokes and it is only funny because it happened to a guy. Of course if a guy cut his wifes tits off and threw them in the dumpster, it would be a different thread. There would be women on here bashing men, men being annoyed about womens rights. The men would treat it like a real problem and start wondering where all the good men have gone. Every women on here would want the guys penis chopped off. really doesn't matter, people don't like be labeled, even when it's true.
Well it looks like that guy isn't getting into heaven. Jesus wants a full sack, no exceptions. Its cool, there's plenty of awesome people in hell though.madster11 said:Hold on, and she managed to keep her face in anyway intact... How?
The natural reaction when something grabs onto your testicles (speaking as a male here) is to punch the face of whatever has grabbed them with every single ounce of strength in your body and then continue to punch it until it can no longer be a threat to your testicles.
This applies to any creature of any sex on the planet, be they a dog, a man, a woman or a damn fluffy rabbit.
Just saying. Damaging the balls is not cool. It's all up in the bible and everything (Deuteronomy 25:11-12).
It's always funny when done on guys. Didn't you know? The sword may be double edged on many subjects, but when it involves male genital mutilation, it's freaking comedic gold! BLunt the sword and HAVE AT IT!Frankster said:Ah gender based violence, it's funny when done on guys apparently.
Seems like we've got another case of 'I know how you think and why because of one sentence'AnarchistFish said:People can't help their urges. Seems like you've been a little indoctrinated by the media.Altorin said:Relish in Chaos said:Fixed. There's nothing inherently bad about someone being sexually attracted to prepubescent children (which is the literal definition of a paedophile, not the media's), only if they act upon those urges.Altorin said:Roast that woman on a spit as far as I'm concerned, unless it turns out the guy was a child molester or something
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
And their previous post and what the reaction to the other commenter suggests.[/quote]Darius Brogan said:Seems like we've got another case of 'I know how you think and why because of one sentence'AnarchistFish said:People can't help their urges. Seems like you've been a little indoctrinated by the media.Altorin said:Relish in Chaos said:Fixed. There's nothing inherently bad about someone being sexually attracted to prepubescent children (which is the literal definition of a paedophile, not the media's), only if they act upon those urges.Altorin said:Roast that woman on a spit as far as I'm concerned, unless it turns out the guy was a child molester or something
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
This isn't something I really want to get into cos it's a bit offtopic and pedantic, but paedophilia in general has been demonised to the point that even the mere suggestion of it terrifies and angers people, and that is definitely the fault of the media. Yes, it's a perversion, and yes it's possible for people to hold those views independently, but to be honest, I think that's the less likely option. "It's ok to physically harm someone if, they're a paedophile!" doesn't seem like an independent thought process considering the context. As far as I'm concerned.Darius Brogan said:Indoctrinated? Really now? It's an opinion. One differing from your own doesn't imply some form of forced thought process.