Dude i love you, years and years ago i had a demo disk with Jagged Alliance 2 on it and was like this game is amasing but i forgot the name and kept searching things like 'jagex' but reading your post finally sparked my memory, now i can get this game as i know what it isoctafish said:Jagged Alliance 2 is a lot more polished in terms of gameplay.
Snake's Revenge not only isn't canon, not only was made without Kojima even being aware of it (till it was almost finished) but it was hardly an improvement over the butchered NES port of Metal Gear 1.BoosterGold said:You forgot SNAKES REVENGETreblaine said:OF COURSE!
[HEADING=2]Metal Gear Solid![/HEADING]
It was a sequel to the MSX(2) and NES 'Metal Gear' and 'Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake' which were in actually fact pretty lame games even for the 8-16 bit era. But Metal Gear Solid for the Playstation and Later PC... that was an all time classic, one of the best and most influential games of all times... and a sequel of all things though a very distant one but HUGELY improved over predecessors.
The second one was alot better. There was just so much more that you could do and it allowed for a little more freedom with regards to the order of certain dungeons. I do still really like the first one, too, though. I can't wait for Dark Dawn.hopeneverdies said:I preferred Golden Sun The Lost Age over the first one. Although maybe the fact that I played the sequel first without realizing it. When I did finally play GS1, it just didn't feel as fun for some reason. I guess because I already knew everything that happened by that point.
Someone agrees? Woah. That's a first. Everyone I know preferred the second one.Bucht said:I feel exactly the same way about it as you do, AC II just didn't feel like a sequel to the game we fell in love with.Glamorgan said:I was about to say Assassin's Creed 2, but I honestly don't think I can. I mean, yes, ACII is a better game. But if you have played the first one, you will remember that feeling that you get after sneaking into a heavily guarded fortress, pulling off an epic assassination, and escaping with half a city of guards chasing you. I remember one time, when I kept letting myself get seen by the guards, just after an assassination, for almost 45 minutes, just because it was so damn fun!
Sure, the second one was much better, but it was just way too easy. It just didn't give me that gut feeling of fun that the first one did.
So yes. ACII was better than the first one, but AC was more fun. Does that make any sense?
Really? REALLY? When did you play the original HL?VikingSteve said:Half-Life 2.
That's no easy feat either. They were both Game of the Year. Not many games can do that.
I know that but I played that game as a kid , and it is fun to say SNAKES REVENGE?!XDTreblaine said:Snake's Revenge not only isn't canon, not only was made without Kojima even being aware of it (till it was almost finished) but it was hardly an improvement over the butchered NES port of Metal Gear 1.BoosterGold said:You forgot SNAKES REVENGETreblaine said:OF COURSE!
[HEADING=2]Metal Gear Solid![/HEADING]
It was a sequel to the MSX(2) and NES 'Metal Gear' and 'Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake' which were in actually fact pretty lame games even for the 8-16 bit era. But Metal Gear Solid for the Playstation and Later PC... that was an all time classic, one of the best and most influential games of all times... and a sequel of all things though a very distant one but HUGELY improved over predecessors.
Metal Gear Solid is proof that even though you may have the most janky and flawed series it can still make an amazing comeback that can utterly revolutionise the industry and the art form, and that's without dismissing the past instalments but embracing their best parts.
Signed.kannibus said:Okay, gonna say it. I liked Baldur's Gate 2 better than the original. It just seemed to have a more epic story.