Shame on everyone who jumped on the OP simply for asking for suggestions. Just like reviewers who condemn games as sexist in their reviews the OP is just expressing his opinion that all this identity politics BS is BS, an opinion doesn't mean that he/she is claiming that something is universally true. It's his opinion and has very little to do with his question, so could we just please answer the question instead of attacking him?
To answer your question OP, sites (English ones) that try to keep the politics to a minimum are quite rare these days (which makes it quite ironic that some people on here are calling the OP privileged because honestly the crowd that wants to read identity politics crap already has 95% of sites to choose from so in this regard it's those people who are privileged).
However what I'd suggest is just checking the important big news from sites like IGN (or possibly forums) and then relying on youtubers for your review-ish content.
Youtube reviews, streamers doing reviews etc. are much better as buyers guides and pro consumer guidance than the narrative/story focused, characters and themes criticizing, politically charged mainstream reviews.
Abomination said:
I too have the OP's opinion when it comes to video game reviews. I understand some people like to read into the underlying "themes" present in games and jump to all sorts of conclusions as to the developers motives - but I certain as fuck don't.
I like me some racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, pro-republican, or what have you content in my video games. And just because a game contains that type of content doesn't mean the game is pro/anti anything.
Killing dudes ain't pro-murder so therefore a woman getting smacked around isn't pro violence against women. A gay getting insulted for their homosexuality isn't an anti-homosexual game.
I enjoy reviews that review the game for what it is, not for some click-bait hyper-sensitive over-reactionary bullshit. GTA5 isn't sexist, it isn't racist, it's SATIRE. Hitman isn't a sexist game and neither is The Witcher (yes, even one, with the sex cards - guess what, Geralt is a womanizer, that's his CHARACTER).
This is pretty much me. I'm glad to see that some people still feel this way.
Fictional murder, corruption, rape, sexism, torture, war crimes what have you are all great. I have zero problems seeing those employed in games if they fit the setting and the story. In fact I want more of all that in games. And even if the devs don't completely succeed in using those things in their games I'd much more like to applaud the effort instead of labeling the devs monsters who've set back society 20 years.
Getting to see and participate in nasty stuff is part of the appeal of games. And there's nothing wrong with that because character meshes made from polygons, textures, lightmaps etc. don't actually have any rights nor should they have.
If a game has some of the stuff I mentioned above I'd much, much rather read a review that explains to me as a consumer why the game is a good game or a bad game and why different people might like it or dislike it. What I do not want to read is that the game is an abomination for portraying something the reviewer considers distasteful. Could we hear more about whether a game succeeds in doing what it set out to do?