Just like the "he didn't bring the gun with him, the 17 year old was armed with a semi-automatic rifle upon arrival" argument, how does playing armed security instead of playing cop make this situation better for 17 year old Rittenhouse?Incorrect.
Rittenhouse wasn't playing cop. At best you could argue maybe security guard but not cop. As reports have pointed out he was administering first aid to people earlier in the night.
I'm not litigating a trial and have no interest is arguing about what technicality the 17 year old playing cop can use to avoid responsibility for killing 2 people.Incorrect.
Due to how it relates to intent which is going to be a key aspect of the trail and potentially the charges as bringing the gun and being given the gun have very different connertations
It does not matter that the toddler is 9000 years old on paperSee first point again about the claim of him playing Cop.