I'm going to stand out as the exception to the compatriots of mine who're jumping around to proclaim loudly how much of a non-issue the balance of racial genocide is to them. To me it is something where I'd like to see some kind of balance. (historically, the British are suggested to have lost far fewer in fatalities, btw)
It's also an issue that so far they've shown nothing that suggests subversion of the common ideas about this war.
The ideas that the British had no plausible political perspective or reason for fighting in this war more nuanced or morally-understandable than 'hating freedom'; (that the British public were fully-informed and backed the war to the hilt) that the Patriots took on the total, fully-committed military might of history's largest empire in a straight-up battle to the last man (ala E3 trailer) and justice won against all the odds; (not, say: the British eventually getting sick of an inefficient, poorly-supported, politically and tactically unsustainable war) that France & Co stepping in couldn't have been about politics and keeping the Empire in check, ala Russia and China of today.