Jabberwock xeno said:
Again:
WHY NO RUSSIAN REVOLUTION!
It'd be perfect!
The period after Lenin's death or during the Great Purge would be better, methinks. There wasn't a lot of action during the Russian Revolution, and while there were horriffic brutalities during the Russian Civil War, the three White Russian armies never got close to Moscow. There were also no major leaders during the Revolution itself - it was a mob phenomenon, and Lenin just jumped on the bandwagon and took the reins when he could - so there aren't really any revolutionaries or counter-revolutionaries to assassinate. Granted, the Revolution itself could serve as a tutorial or introduction to the setting, but the NEP period (1924-29) and the Great Purge (1937-38) would provide more interesting gameplay. There was an absolutely byzantine (pun intended) amount of scheming going on between Lenin's death and Stalin's ascension to power, which would lend itself perfectly to assassination missions, and during the Great Purge, the NKVD was everywhere, making people disappear - again, a suitable setting for an Asscreed game.
The most exciting event in Petrograd during the Russian Revolution was the "siege" of the Winter Palace, which was being defended by the Women's Battalion of Death [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_Battalion] (seriously [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer]) at the behest of Kerensky's Provisional Government. The palace didn't have a central heating system, and the (male) Bolshevik soldiers outside had fires going and vodka to drink. Some of the defenders climbed out the windows to warm themselves at the fires, some of the men climbed in to warm themselves with the women, and come morning there were more Bolsheviks in the Winter Palace than there were defenders. That's about as exciting as the Revolution got, until the Civil War broke out.
norwegian-guy said:
How old will Ezio be in this one? I think he was 50 in the last one and then they joked about how old he was getting. I mean... isn't 50+ a little old for an assassin in the renaissance?
The average human lifespan before the Industrial Revolution was much longer than most people think. The image of people of 40, 50 being rare old geezers stems from the nineteenth century underclasses, before this time period the average lifespan was much closer to what it was roughly halfway through the twentieth century. (These days, we do grow significantly older due to modern medicine.) The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries actually saw the health and lifespan of average people (i.e. peasants) increase; the European population had grown so large during the thirteenth century that a continental famine was looming. Then the Black Death mashed the reset button and after the dust had settled and the bodies stopped dropping living standards had actually gone up a lot, as more food was available, higher wages were paid due to the loss of about a third of the working population and the average lifespan became much longer.
That's for peasants. Ezio is an aristocrat, and an Assassin. Aristocrats have always had longer and healthier lives than the common folk, due to being able to afford a substantial, healthy diet, and the best medicine available in their day (how effective this was is up for debate however). Furthermore, Ezio's life is one constant workout, given the fact that he's free-running everywhere. So even if he is pushing 60, he's probably still healthy and in shape, and it's not too much of a stretch to have him hopping about the city like he's not a day over 20.