"Sexual activity must not be related to incentives or rewards."
Because clearly there are no incentives or rewards related to sex in real life.
Also the GTA example pisses me off. Yes, you're able to pay a prostitute and then kill her afterwards. But does the game tell you to do this? No. Is there a reward for this? No. If anything, the game punishes this by giving you a police star.
IT'S CALLED FREE WILL GUYS. JUST BECAUSE IT'S AN OPTION DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE GAME CONDONES IT.
/ragecaps
Lordbishop said:
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
Does Australia even have Freedom of speech?
Yes and No.
'Freedom of Speech' Is an implied right as it's not stated in the Australian Constitution but the High Court interpreted article 19(2) "Freedom of communication on political matters" thus enabled us to slander politicians but speak freely about anything else will resign with the principle of prima facie: The fact is true unless proven otherwise meaning you can be sued for defamation.
Also, idk where the line is drawn in the Australian Constitution, but it's unclear if this could be protected under free speech in the American Constitution anyways. Profanity, defined as offensive speech with no redeeming social value, is not protected under the first amendment. And given the Australian government's tighter morals considering video games, I think they might be more likely to use this distinction to their advantage.
Thyunda said:
"Simulation, yes - the real thing, no."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't all videogame sex simulated? Maybe if a Kinect game demanded you and your partner get it on to beat the level, it would make sense...but I can't see what's going on here....
I also thought this. Do they think people regularly have sex with their consoles or something? And even if they did get it on to beat the level, what are they gonna do? Prevent all couples from having consensual sex ever?