Steppin Razor said:
Shaegor said:
I constantly hear this complaining about quickscoping in CoD games, and I'm wondering... Why do people find it so unbalanced? Well yeah, it doesn't exactly go with the point that snipers stand for but what else? I mean, in TF2 at least, quick scoping takes a considerable amount of skill.
Quickscoping in Modern Warfare 2 abuses the aim assist function. When you hit aim with the crosshairs centered over an enemy, the gun will be locked onto them when you look down the sight. How it abuses it is that the weapon will already be locked onto the target pretty much the moment you hit aim, so you can fire a sniper rifle and hit a target before you get anywhere near looking down the scope. Factoring in that a sniper rifle with FMJ and the Stopping Power perk has around a 85-90% chance of getting a one shot kill makes it an extremely effective, and fairly frustrating to face, tactic. Sure, it works well, but it looks all sorts of wrong when people charge in with a sniper rifle that they use like a shotgun.
This post is almost entirely untrue.
The only effect aim assist has on quickscoping is that if you drag your scope over the person it slows down very slightly when you're over them, making it slightly, slightly easier to hit them.
You
do not lock on, that is simply, and demonstrably not true.
Furthermore until you are actually in scope, any shot is treated as a no scope, i.e. will go anywhere in your crosshairs.
Lastly, you will do better with an automatic gun every time, this is fact.
A sniper rifle is a one hit kill, eh 70% considering hitmarkers, it takes a little while to bring up the scope, long enough to be killed by a Scar, or a FAMAS, and then you have to factor in how much more difficult it is to aim and hit someone with one bullet rather than thirty.
All of this quickscoping hate (or at least the vast majority) comes from people who're butthurt because they see people owning them with a sniper rifle and are pissed off.