Blizzard Drops the Hammer on "Inappropriate" StarCraft 2 Maps

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Blizzard Drops the Hammer on "Inappropriate" StarCraft 2 Maps


Blizzard is monitoring user-made maps in StarCraft 2 [http://www.amazon.com/Starcraft-II-Wings-Liberty-Pc/dp/B000ZKA0J6/ref=sr_1_1?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1281023662&sr=1-1] more closely than it has for past games, saying it now has the resources to keep a closer eye on things and it's going to put them to use.

It looks like Battle.net [http://www.blizzard.com], published maps are subject to review to ensure that they promote a fun and safe environment for all players."

"If a map is found to contain inappropriate content, it will be removed from Battle.net and the map maker will be contacted via email," she continued. "Should a player have any questions or concerns regarding a specific action, he or she is welcome to contact our support representatives."

When asked why Blizzard is taking a more aggressive approach toward StarCraft 2 than it did with the original game, Bashiok, another community manager, responded bluntly [http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/248105900?page=6#115], "Because we can. Literally. We have a support department now of size and ability to enforce these types of things. It simply wasn't possible when our in-game support used to consist of approximately 20 technical support agents."

But he also acknowledged that the process for keeping map makers up to speed is still being tweaked. "We're working on improving our processes to ensure the map maker has more information on why their map was removed," he wrote in a later post [http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/248105900?page=7#136]. "Right now it is a bit vague and has obviously led to this misunderstanding."

Blizzard's "Inappropriate Content Policy Overview" can be read in full at blizzard.com [http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en_US&articleId=33752].

via: Big Download [http://news.bigdownload.com/2010/08/04/blizzard-deleting-some-starcraft-ii-user-made-maps-for-inapprop/]


Permalink
 

mxfox408

Pee Eye Em Pee Daddy
Apr 4, 2010
478
0
0
Then companies wonder why people pirate shit in otherwords private servers.
 

qbanknight

New member
Apr 15, 2009
669
0
0
Big brother is watching you now that they can.

You know I'm curious, define "inappropriate content". Like dick-shaped maps? Maps that spell curse words? Wonder what all the fuss is about
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Here's a challenge for the News Room:

In the following week, can you find me a story that doesn't paint Acti/Blizz as something short of the Third Reich?

I mean, fair's fair, you get a week.

(That's not to say the news is, in any way, biased; but they just keep acting like such control freaks)
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
And this is why I'm not buying the damn thing, I remember having hours and hours of fun with my friends using the LAN mode playing custom maps we each designed, sure there was the occasional dong map that was only funny after a few beers, but for crying out loud this is just obnoxious.
 

Nimzar

New member
Nov 30, 2009
532
0
0
qbanknight said:
Big brother is watching you now that they can.

You know I'm curious, define "inappropriate content". Like dick-shaped maps? Maps that spell curse words? Wonder what all the fuss is about
I am also curious... though honestly I'm not sure I want to know what content they are blocking.

Just the thought of inappropriate SCII maps is causing some very unwanted mental imagery.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Yet another reason not to buy that crap. Inappropriate maps...ffs. On no somebody made a plateau shaped like a dick, better hide it before all the girls turn into whores and the boys into catamites.

I wish the "think of the children" people would just go form a commune somewhere and stop bothering the rest of us.
 

Jaker the Baker

Guild Warrior
Nov 9, 2009
160
0
0
So, could they re-enable LAN now? So I could HAVE some sort of dick-shaped map, and then just keep it among my bros? Is that so much to ask for?
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
I have mixed feeling about this, while I can understand the basis of protecting battle.net for cheaters and exploiters, and protecting the ESRB rating of the game with public maps there are taking things to far.
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
cursedseishi said:
qbanknight said:
Big brother is watching you now that they can.

You know I'm curious, define "inappropriate content". Like dick-shaped maps? Maps that spell curse words? Wonder what all the fuss is about
Eh, taken from experience, there were maps out there that used the environment tiles as pixels of sorts, and surprisingly a rather detailed picture could be created with it. There was a .Hack bound game that used it. There was also several pornographic maps that people would ask about in chat channels.

I'm pretty sure the latter could easily be considered inappropriate.


And root, Activision IS a control freak, so long as there's a possible way for Kotick to squeeze money, he'll choke babies to get it.
Only choke them? He must be getting nicer.

OT: I can kind of understand this. It entirely depends on what they deem innapropriate. I support the if they only delete maps the are pornographic, or giant curse words and racial slurs.
 

scarab7

New member
Jun 20, 2009
313
0
0
Really? So much hate for this? Any of you bother to read their policy? I welcome this, anyone whos played Warcraft 3 custom matches would know there are people who try to host porn on the game. Yes people, porn, sometimes advertised as such or in disguise.
 
Nov 5, 2007
453
0
0
OH NOES THEY ARE TAKING AWAY MY PRECIOUS PENIS MAP!

Seriously, are some of you just looking for something to ***** about when it comes to SC2? They are monitoring their stuff like Sony did with LBP and Modnation Racers. If you feel your liberties are reduced because you cannot show the world the amazing cock-shaped map you just made, I think you're the one with a problem.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
And quite rightly, too. If I'm playing a game I want to play it for the fun of the game itself, not because I want to get my kicks from laughing at childish, immature maps shaped like someone's dick or islands in the game that spell swear words. If you find that funny, are you really the right age to play games like these?
 

UnusualStranger

Keep a hat handy
Jan 23, 2010
13,588
0
41
However, I wonder if people understand the situation fully.

This isn't just about maps, it is also about triggers (Which people will not even see) having inappropriate words in them, when they are not even inappropriate. This in itself is just an annoying as hell filter that is terribly unnecessary.

However, this also shows something that I feared, and rightly now shown, about Starcraft 2. This type of exertion of control is somewhat...choking to a modding community. What exactly is being ruled as bad? And where are the guidelines for this? Are they deep and descriptive, or just a general "Objectionable material"?