Yep this latest update seems pretty pathetic but I might take the Steve Jobs approach and let somebody stir those waters first before I make my move on giving it a go. However if wow gets put down the only thing that will sprout up in it's place are shitty wow clones and wow has always done wow best.Paradoxrifts said:Time to take World Of Warcraft out of sight behind the far shed and put it out of it's misery with a shotgun slug to the temple.
*Glare*, Ladies and gentlemen... This is why we can't have nice Things. Because people judge a formidable foe.Earnest Cavalli said:We aren't here to judge, but actually I'm lying; we are totally here to judge. Harshly, and with childish giggling.
All of which looked badass, bloodthirsty and capable. They are nothing like these Pandaran's balls of fluff.Radoh said:Okay, to people complaining about furries getting all over your WoW:
Taurens, Worgens, Druids.
Pandas were in WC3 and all the RPG books to date, the lore for them has been around as long if not longer than Cow Lore which was shit out for WC3 to add more horde units.Yokai said:(Apologies if someone replied already) The Tauren have been around since Warcraft III and were an established part of the lore. Besides, most people agree that minotaurs are pretty badass. There was a Pandaren in the Frozen Throne, but he was supposed to be a one-shot joke character, because Blizzard figured no one would take anthropomorphic pandas seriously. They were mostly right, and now people are taking the fact that they're trying to legitimize the Pandaren as evidence that Blizzard is grasping at straws, trying to keep the WoW money balloon inflated for as long as possible. I tend to agree.Mordwyl said:Why are people making a fuss about the Pandaren again? The Tauren are one of the original Horde races since classic and nobody said a word about there being a playable race of anthropomorphic bovines, lest we forget the kobolds, gnolls and furbolgs to name a few of the beastman races which inhabit the world.
Hate to be the Bear-er of bad news, but she could use a little work.DVS BSTrD said:Wow the female of another species in WoW looks like a pallet swapped human woman. Who could have seen THAT coming?
Actually, that doesn't bother me at allI think she looks absolutely Po-fectshameduser said:I always thought Blizzard was abreast that sort of thing.Freechoice said:They're pandaren to that demographic now. Furst the worgen, now pandas.tehweave said:Yup.
Furries.
Isn't the depiction of violence towards pandas illegal in China? If so, it seems to me that the Asian market will be the only subscribers worldwide who won't be playing it!Tiger Sora said:Well WoW certainly didn't make the Panderans a playable race for us North Americans or Europeans. More for the 5 million Chinese and SK players. And they've been in WoW lore forever but still ya. Certainly pandering to the asian market. ^_^
Either that or they take out PvP and any or all missions where you hurt a Pandaran. And I doubt it's Violence against Pandas if the panda is doing all the killing... That said I think Chinese Pandaren are going to be over powered.Oliver90909 said:Isn't the depiction of violence towards pandas illegal in China? If so, it seems to me that the Asian market will be the only subscribers worldwide who won't be playing it!Tiger Sora said:Well WoW certainly didn't make the Panderans a playable race for us North Americans or Europeans. More for the 5 million Chinese and SK players. And they've been in WoW lore forever but still ya. Certainly pandering to the asian market. ^_^
She's not that bad. I actually like her. I'm just wondering why it's taking so long for them to bring in Fox people and feline people. It would complete the immediate set of animal people. Only other thing of note would be dragon people, and I don't think they are that common in lore.MmmFiber said:Hate to be the Bear-er of bad news, but she could use a little work.DVS BSTrD said:Wow the female of another species in WoW looks like a pallet swapped human woman. Who could have seen THAT coming?
Actually, that doesn't bother me at allI think she looks absolutely Po-fectshameduser said:I always thought Blizzard was abreast that sort of thing.Freechoice said:They're pandaren to that demographic now. Furst the worgen, now pandas.tehweave said:Yup.
Furries.
BOOBSFreechoice said:They know how to entice with digtital avatars.shameduser said:I always thought Blizzard was abreast that sort of thing.Freechoice said:They're pandaren to that demographic now. Furst the worgen, now pandas.tehweave said:Yup.
Furries.
I'm not sure how stringent they are about it, but I suspect the public outcry would be a fox news-worthy "New Warcraft game depicts murder of our national animal".ZexionSephiroth said:Either that or they take out PvP and any or all missions where you hurt a Pandaran. And I doubt it's Violence against Pandas if the panda is doing all the killing... That said I think Chinese Pandaren are going to be over powered.Oliver90909 said:Isn't the depiction of violence towards pandas illegal in China? If so, it seems to me that the Asian market will be the only subscribers worldwide who won't be playing it!Tiger Sora said:Well WoW certainly didn't make the Panderans a playable race for us North Americans or Europeans. More for the 5 million Chinese and SK players. And they've been in WoW lore forever but still ya. Certainly pandering to the asian market. ^_^