Blizzard Still Changing "Core Systems" in Diablo 3

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Blizzard Still Changing "Core Systems" in Diablo 3


Blizzard is still messing around with core systems in Diablo 3, saying that "no one will remember if it's late, only if it's great."

status update [http://www.amazon.com/Diablo-III-Pc/dp/B00178630A/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1327005571&sr=8-1] posted today, Blizzard's Jay Wilson said the studio is still "continuing to iterate on some of the core game systems."

"We're changing some of the systems we've gotten the most feedback on both internally and from the beta test, including crafting, items, core attributes, and inventory," he explained. "In addition we're working on major changes to the skill and rune systems that we're not ready to talk about, but I promise you we can't possibly ship without a finished skill and rune system."

Among the changes are the elimination of identification scrolls, a fixture of the first two games. In Diablo 3, however, players will be their very own Deckard Cain, with the ability to identify new items entirely on their own. "You'll simply right click it, a short cast timer will occur as your character examines the item, and it will become identified," Wilson said. "We love the double-discovery of finding a present and then unwrapping it, but we don't think it requires a physical item you have to find and keep in your bags to get the same effect."

The fifth quick-slot button is being relocated and made into a dedicated potion button, which will help keep players aware of their potion situation, and the Mystic artisan is being removed because she wasn't adding anything of value to the customization system. The Cauldron of Jordan and the Nephalem Cube have also been cut, while the Stone of Recall, which was originally intended to take the place of the old Town Portal, has been renamed to - you guessed it - Town Portal and is now directly integrated into the skill bar.

Character attributes are being changed to Strength, Dexterity, Intellect and Vitality, which is pretty huge business, while the Attack, Defense and Precision attributes are being dropped. Armor will take the place of Defense, +Physical Resist will take the place of Armor and +Chance to Crit will substitute for Precision. The inventory interface has also been "streamlined."

"There's a lot of work left to be done," Wilson continued. "We're also working on a number of other large systems changes -- specifically with the skill and rune systems. We're not quite ready to share what those are just yet, but we look forward to being able to do so in the near future."

The upside to this obsessive attention to detail is that Blizzard games are almost invariably excellent. Seriously, when was the last time a Blizzard game sucked? But the downside, in this case, is disappointment for anyone expecting a relatively near-future launch, or even just a release date, following the South Korean rating. Sounds to me like Diablo 3 is going to be in the shop for a good while yet.


Permalink
 

Artemis923

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,496
0
0
Glad to see they went back to calling it a TP. "Stone of Recall" stinks of "Hearthstone" to me.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
People DO care if something's late. They may excuse it, but the whole concept of "Valve Time" dismisses the notion that people won't or don't care if something is late.
 

ASnogarD

New member
Jul 2, 2009
525
0
0
Next suprise news, after a year or two delay... PC and Console versions to be launch at the same time.

... actually the streamlining and changing of things to remove more clicks sort of hints at that as well :eek:
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
The more I hear about Diablo 3, the less interested I become. I was pretty much out of it anyway because of the "always online" nonsense, but the way it's being "streamlined" smacks of... well, not a game I'm particularly interested in. There is such a thing as too much convenience.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
The fifth quick-slot button is being relocated and made into a dedicated potion button, which will help keep players aware of their potion situation, and the Mystic artisan is being removed because she wasn't adding anything of value to the customization system.
Translation: The Mystic Artisan was enabling players to twink their gear to the point it was reducing grind. And we can't have that.

Bitterness aside, a lot of those changes don't really seem to make sense.
Renaming stats isn't changing them if they function as they did before; the rest is just interface rearrangements mostly with sound reasoning, but worrying consequences (will the Console-bug finally bite Blizzard's PC gamers on the ass too? Doubtful, given that Blizzard polishes their product to a mirror-shine in regards to controls and interface.).

But for me, there is one critical flaw with Diablo 3: until the issue of Always-Online DRM is addressed, I'm still not even looking to buy the game, sorry.

Captcha: Erlsplat Called

How cheeky.
 

Nalgas D. Lemur

New member
Nov 20, 2009
1,318
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
There is such a thing as too much convenience.
On one hand that's often true. On the other, one of the best minor things about Titan Quest compared to Torchlight, both of which I played at around the same point in time, was that it didn't make me put up with crap like town portal and identify scrolls, which add zero fun to the game for me, just tedium and wasted inventory slots. Not that I plan to ever play Diablo 3 (also because of the "always online" thing), but I'm glad to see that being changed.

Of course, that said, the main reason I liked Titan Quest so much more than Torchlight was that it had a lot more depth to it with the more complex multiclass/skill system, so obviously I'm not one for oversimplification...
 

Tzekelkan

New member
Dec 27, 2009
498
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
Bitterness aside, a lot of those changes don't really seem to make sense.
Renaming stats isn't changing them if they function as they did before; the rest is just interface rearrangements mostly with sound reasoning.
This is the one change I'm not very fond of, exactly because they don't function as before. Or, er, wait, when is this before?

In the previous iteration of D3, they had an Attack stat that just game everyone +dmg, a Precision for +crit chance, Defense for +dmg reduction and Vitality. Now they've gone back to the D2 system of doing it, which is too bad in my opinion because the previous system was a welcome change from all other RPGs.

And what's this deal with always-on? For all intents and purposes, it's exactly what Starcraft II had (its "Guest mode" function was a joke). I'm okay with it, since it's not just mindless DRM like Ubisoft, but also a safeguard against hacking and duping (which was a major issue in D2), which is necessary considering the real money auction house.
 

Zen Toombs

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,105
0
0
"no one will remember if it's late, only if it's great."

There is wisdom in this, if only done in moderation. For example, as a fanboy of Mass Effect, I was actually glad when they decided to push back the release date to March instead of cramming for a holiday release. The game should be better for it.

However, if one decides to go by way of Valve's Half Life 3, then vengeance and furious anger shall ensue.

In short: one must strike a balance between lateness and greatness.
 

Darkmantle

New member
Oct 30, 2011
1,031
0
0
Why not just immediately tell us what the item is if you are not going to have any cost to identify. It just wastes my fucking time.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
"due to player feedback (marketing department) we are removing the ability to play with a keyboard and mouse"

Seriously though the always on DRM is a dealbreaker for me. Connecting to your server to play a single player game is of no advantage to me and a huge inconvenience.

Keep the closed bnet for the cool kids, let me and my friends play on a LAN or direct IP, you know just like D2 did.

Remember the last "big" action RPG that required a server connection for multiplayer? Hellgate London...pause and meditate on that....
 

Polock

New member
Jan 23, 2010
332
0
0
I'm ok with this.

Simplicity helps. Diablo 2 was simple, yet has some complexities. I hope its the same, with just more customization options. But I really don't want too much.
 

Imre Csete

Original Character, Do Not Steal
Jul 8, 2010
785
0
0
How can you streamline a system that only required minimum knowledge of the four basic operations?
 

TitsMcGee1804

New member
Dec 24, 2008
244
0
0
rembrandtqeinstein said:
"due to player feedback (marketing department) we are removing the ability to play with a keyboard and mouse"

Seriously though the always on DRM is a dealbreaker for me. Connecting to your server to play a single player game is of no advantage to me and a huge inconvenience.

Keep the closed bnet for the cool kids, let me and my friends play on a LAN or direct IP, you know just like D2 did.

Remember the last "big" action RPG that required a server connection for multiplayer? Hellgate London...pause and meditate on that....
Paragraph 1: Tell me one change that they just implemented that means they are making this more console friendly

p2: Tell me the last time your computer wasnt connected to the internet...whats that? your connection is on and off at times?...STOP LYING

p3: Well then I guess you should stick to your little bubble of friends and never venture beyond your comfort zone lest you risk losing your innocence to an online random

p4: Comparing d3 to hellgate london...seriously?

Im not a blizzard fanboy...im a people who respect this medium and their consumers fanboy, and dont sell me a product that isnt finished
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Tzekelkan said:
And what's this deal with always-on? For all intents and purposes, it's exactly what Starcraft II had (its "Guest mode" function was a joke). I'm okay with it, since it's not just mindless DRM like Ubisoft, but also a safeguard against hacking and duping (which was a major issue in D2), which is necessary considering the real money auction house.
Based on what I remember from post-Rust Storm D2, hacking and duping continued largely unabated once they broke the new code. I remember. I was there for it.

And seeing how they had to sample the new client network code to do it (as they would in D3) to trick the server into doing certain things (usually by crashing the client), I imagine that Blizzard will have to remain ever vigilant to prevent hacked items from ruining their new mini-Gold Farm.

The Guest Mode/Offline Campaign of Starcraft 2 may be a joke to you, but it was the ONLY PART of the game I could actually enjoy due to how fuck-awful my internet choices are where I'm at (that don't run me for close to $100/month).
Good thing I liked it too, because I found it completely retarded that I couldn't even play botmatches without connecting to their server, despite the AI code already being included in my install.

I was only ever able to play multiplayer when I was at a friend's who has cable internet; never at my own house. Since Diablo 3 is online-only, for practical purposes, the DRM is every bit as bad as Ubisoft's for me.

In their rush to take absolute control of their game, Blizzard trampled over my usability, and apparently, they *still* failed to stop the pirates from getting a working version out anyway.
 

maswell

New member
Aug 6, 2010
98
0
0
Fine with me. I have such a huge backlog I wouldn't mind if it was pushed back a year if it meant it was better.. And diablo 3 is the game I'm most looking forward to coming out.
 

Parker Hylton

New member
Jan 20, 2012
1
0
0
Having followed this game for a year, I can sum this article up in one line...

"We dumbed it down for the console, and were absolutely stunned to discover our 100% PC beta testers didn't like it!"

Gotta make sure that serious gamers can be beat by a mentally-challenged button-mashing five year old on an aging GameCube. Anything complicated would be a blow to the pocketbook!
 

chiefohara

New member
Sep 4, 2009
985
0
0
maswell said:
Fine with me. I have such a huge backlog I wouldn't mind if it was pushed back a year if it meant it was better.. And diablo 3 is the game I'm most looking forward to coming out.
Amen Brother, i was thinking the exact same thing. With Mass Effect 3, and GTA 5 comming out, not to mention im still battling my way through Skyrim, im glad this is delayed... i have wayyy too much of a backlog of games to finish off.
 

Ziadaine_v1legacy

Flamboyant Homosexual
Apr 11, 2009
1,604
0
0
Oh god its Duke Nukem Forever all over again....

So long as it's both good and they dont go bankrupt from it I'll be happy.