Blowing Away the Triple-A

Mark D. Stroyer

New member
Apr 12, 2011
128
0
0
Welcome to the club.

I say that sadly, because I really hate not liking games. I particularly don't like it when it seems people only know and play games that just aren't good.

But I REALLY hate it when it's very, very hard to find games that are really good. Maybe I have impossible standards? Can't be that, because I've got a collection of games I adore. (And this is also coming from the guy who enjoyed Dragon Age II. Yeah. Weird.)

Still, I'm very proud to say that the last Call of Duty I played was 4. And I played every one before that, too. Guess why I stopped.
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
I know that feel, the last AAA game I bought was new super Mario brothers Wii and I just felt disappointment and guilt. Everything it does older Mario games and Indy games also do, better even!
 

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
Dennis Scimeca said:
you can practically throw a dart into a room of indie developers
Please don't. Indie devs have enough issues without adding bodily harm to the mix. :)

Also, regarding your new avatar: finger off the trigger!

Mark D. Stroyer said:
Still, I'm very proud to say that the last Call of Duty I played was 4. And I played every one before that, too. Guess why I stopped.
A while back my girlfriend was on the phone with her parents, and at one point I hear "Yeah, I think he's played Call of Duty". I "corrected" her and said I don't play CoD, even though I played the original and United Offensive. I clarified later, but I realized just how much stigma there is for being a "Call of Duty player".
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Evil Smurf said:
I know that feel, the last AAA game I bought was new super Mario brothers Wii and I just felt disappointment and guilt. Everything it does older Mario games and Indy games also do, better even!
thats not a AAA game....at least I wouldnt call it that...

Im curious ot know what the "big release" was..0_0

anyway...*sigh* ok whatever AAA games suck..indie games are teh best..I'm kind of sicking of hearing this shit...perhaps I just havnt had all the hope sucked out of me

I mean jesus I was thinking of buying a new computer...but no, mabye I wont fucking bother now if games that you can run on a toaster are the second coming great fine...so I guess its all quirky cartoon graphics here on out, goodbye boxed copies! hello fucking up my download cap!!

oh that and F2P multiplayer......YAY!

so no more Bioshcok, Assasins creed and Deus Ex its all over now......I'll run off to kick starter and fund "quirky indie wankfest: the indie-ing!" BECAUSE THATS WHERE THE GOOD GAMES ARE

because everything I like sucks now, it always has
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Mark D. Stroyer said:
Still, I'm very proud to say that the last Call of Duty I played was 4. And I played every one before that, too. Guess why I stopped.
proud of somthing like that?....oh please
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Dennis Scimeca said:
Blowing Away the Triple-A

When heart and character trumps all.

Read Full Article
It's amazing how creative we (as humans) can be when there aren't people standing over us demanding we make them scads of money. It's not enough that the game make some money. It must make back a kablillion times what you spent, or we'll just drop it and release another clone.

Nearly every endeavor in the modern world would produce better results if we weren't so goddamned (so-called) "Results Oriented."
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
Hmmm... other than visually, this game doesn't really sound all that new and unique at all. There are a ton of games that have used a base of, or very similar to, CCG mechanics in the recent past. In fact, it was actually something of a meme for a while a few years back to make a "new" genre by just taking an old one and sticking in CCGish mechanics.

I get what the author is saying to some degree, and far be it from me to dump on his own personal positive reaction to a game, but he picked a rather poor example to illustrate his point.
 

Two-A

New member
Aug 1, 2012
247
0
0
Vault101 said:
Evil Smurf said:
I know that feel, the last AAA game I bought was new super Mario brothers Wii and I just felt disappointment and guilt. Everything it does older Mario games and Indy games also do, better even!
thats not a AAA game....at least I wouldnt call it that...

Im curious ot know what the "big release" was..0_0

anyway...*sigh* ok whatever AAA games suck..indie games are teh best..I'm kind of sicking of hearing this shit...perhaps I just havnt had all the hope sucked out of me

I mean jesus I was thinking of buying a new computer...but no, mabye I wont fucking bother now if games that you can run on a toaster are the second coming great fine...so I guess its all quirky cartoon graphics here on out, goodbye boxed copies! hello fucking up my download cap!!

oh that and F2P multiplayer......YAY!

so no more Bioshcok, Assasins creed and Deus Ex its all over now......I'll run off to kick starter and fund "quirky indie wankfest: the indie-ing!" BECAUSE THATS WHERE THE GOOD GAMES ARE

because everything I like sucks now, it always has

It's not that all AAA games suck (I actually enjoyed Deus Ex:HR, Assassin's Creed 2, and a lot of other AAA games.). It's just that, because most big name publishers are focused on sales, the development of the majority AAA games feels formulaic. Take CoD for example, it's practically the same game released every year. The indie developers have more creative freedom because they most of them aren't as focused on sales as they are on creating something they like. It's not that AAA games can't offer worthwhile expiriences, it's just that it's harder.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Two-A said:
It's not that all AAA games suck (I actually enjoyed Deus Ex:HR, Assassin's Creed 2, and a lot of other AAA games.). It's just that, because most big name publishers are focused on sales, the development of the majority AAA games feels formulaic. Take CoD for example, it's practically the same game released every year. The indie developers have more creative freedom because they most of them aren't as focused on sales as they are on creating something they like. It's not that AAA games can't offer worthwhile expiriences, it's just that it's harder.
eh..I was kind of having a mad rant

I just get a little sick of it...and also sick of hearing COD as the representiive of all AAA games...over the past year or so all the AAA games Ive played have been bearely anything like COD
 

CrazyCapnMorgan

Is not insane, just crazy >:)
Jan 5, 2011
2,742
0
0
Dastardly said:
Dennis Scimeca said:
Blowing Away the Triple-A

When heart and character trumps all.

Read Full Article
It's amazing how creative we (as humans) can be when there aren't people standing over us demanding we make them scads of money. It's not enough that the game make some money. It must make back a kablillion times what you spent, or we'll just drop it and release another clone.

Nearly every endeavor in the modern world would produce better results if we weren't so goddamned (so-called) "Results Oriented."
That wouldn't be because money, like all sources of perceived power, ultimately corrupts without the wisdom to temper it and the courage to guide it now, would it?

I remember a time when games like LUNAR, Wild ARMs, Grandia, Killer Instinct, Secret of Mana, Secret of Evermore, Final Fantasy 6, Metroid, Chrono Trigger, Mega Man (you heard right) were not only great games...but also didn't require a metric fuck-ton of money, development OR publication-wise.

Nowadays, though, to even support a franchise the situation demands a near-impossible result from the consumer. (See Dead Space 3 and MegaMan Legends 3 for examples of this) I believe that when developers are free of what money demands they do, you'll start to see gems like the above - but I fear that might be a long time coming.

On a side note, games that would be awesome to be made now can't be made due to legal or copyright reasonings. For example, in a gaming world FILLED to the brim with bland, and over-bloated IMO, FPS pool, you'd think that theoretical games like Star Wars: Battlefront 3 and a new Timesplitters game would be more than welcomed in this market.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
That wouldn't be because money, like all sources of perceived power, ultimately corrupts without the wisdom to temper it and the courage to guide it now, would it?
Sorta. Money is a means to an end, like anything else. The problem is that particular end is very different from the goal of creativity.

Creativity is attempting to try new things, experiment, explore. Money is about guarantees, which demand we play safe.

It's why I stopped pursuing a career in composition -- I found the more I wrote for money (or even grades), the less I did what I wanted and the more I did what I felt I "should." But if I don't have to rely on my art to make a living, I can always be sure to engage it on my terms.

I believe that when developers are free of what money demands they do, you'll start to see gems like the above - but I fear that might be a long time coming.
We have to blame the developers for some of it, to be sure. A lot of them are techies, and they're looking to show off tech... which usually means bigger, better visuals. Because they, as techies, are impressed by it, they somewhat narrowly believe everyone will be impressed by it. Aaaaaand, as a result, money gets spent there rather than on writing, sound engineering, or voice acting.

So yeah, most of the blame is on the bean counters, but some of it is on the developers. Like an architect with tunnel vision, they work too hard to build a house that is structurally awesome... and they don't have enough resources to put anything in it when they're done.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
Well this is what happens when someone calls themselves a gamer, but really they like one or two games. I know people that literally only buy Call of Duty once a year and play that for the entire year.

Activision sees that they've sold 14 trillion copies and says that people love it so they don't really need to change it.

The problem with AAA games isn't that they're bad, but rather that I've played them already. I don't want to play Halo 4. I don't care what the story is, or that the game is going to be the most polished thing ever. I've played enough Halo to last a lifetime. I want to experience new things.
 

ayvee

New member
Jan 29, 2010
107
0
0
StriderShinryu said:
Hmmm... other than visually, this game doesn't really sound all that new and unique at all. There are a ton of games that have used a base of, or very similar to, CCG mechanics in the recent past. In fact, it was actually something of a meme for a while a few years back to make a "new" genre by just taking an old one and sticking in CCGish mechanics.

I get what the author is saying to some degree, and far be it from me to dump on his own personal positive reaction to a game, but he picked a rather poor example to illustrate his point.
He's not the first person I've seen to have this reaction to Card Hunter, so maybe this game really is going to be something special. I think it's less about pure originality in this case and more about novelty, and just how well the elements supposedly work together. In any case, sometimes it's hard to get a feel for a game based on the description of mechanics.
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
ayvee said:
StriderShinryu said:
Hmmm... other than visually, this game doesn't really sound all that new and unique at all. There are a ton of games that have used a base of, or very similar to, CCG mechanics in the recent past. In fact, it was actually something of a meme for a while a few years back to make a "new" genre by just taking an old one and sticking in CCGish mechanics.

I get what the author is saying to some degree, and far be it from me to dump on his own personal positive reaction to a game, but he picked a rather poor example to illustrate his point.
He's not the first person I've seen to have this reaction to Card Hunter, so maybe this game really is going to be something special. I think it's less about pure originality in this case and more about novelty, and just how well the elements supposedly work together. In any case, sometimes it's hard to get a feel for a game based on the description of mechanics.
That is very true, and I believe there's actually a very positive story about the game on Kotaku right now as well. I don't doubt that the authors have had genuinely positive experiences with the game, and maybe it truly is something super cool and fun. I just feel that if you're going to write an article with an entire argument pinned on one example, you should pick a really good one instead of one that just feels really good to you.

As an example, it's sort of like saying that you just bought a new pair of shoes and that they are the greatest pair of shoes ever. Then, when queried as to what makes them the greatest, you reply by saying that they go on your feet and keep your feet warmer than when you go barefoot. Now, that is quite likely true but it does nothing to support your argument or explain what makes your chosen shoes better than all of the other footware on the market.
 

ayvee

New member
Jan 29, 2010
107
0
0
StriderShinryu said:
ayvee said:
StriderShinryu said:
Hmmm... other than visually, this game doesn't really sound all that new and unique at all. There are a ton of games that have used a base of, or very similar to, CCG mechanics in the recent past. In fact, it was actually something of a meme for a while a few years back to make a "new" genre by just taking an old one and sticking in CCGish mechanics.

I get what the author is saying to some degree, and far be it from me to dump on his own personal positive reaction to a game, but he picked a rather poor example to illustrate his point.
He's not the first person I've seen to have this reaction to Card Hunter, so maybe this game really is going to be something special. I think it's less about pure originality in this case and more about novelty, and just how well the elements supposedly work together. In any case, sometimes it's hard to get a feel for a game based on the description of mechanics.
That is very true, and I believe there's actually a very positive story about the game on Kotaku right now as well. I don't doubt that the authors have had genuinely positive experiences with the game, and maybe it truly is something super cool and fun. I just feel that if you're going to write an article with an entire argument pinned on one example, you should pick a really good one instead of one that just feels really good to you.

As an example, it's sort of like saying that you just bought a new pair of shoes and that they are the greatest pair of shoes ever. Then, when queried as to what makes them the greatest, you reply by saying that they go on your feet and keep your feet warmer than when you go barefoot. Now, that is quite likely true but it does nothing to support your argument or explain what makes your chosen shoes better than all of the other footware on the market.
Well, to be fair it seems like this game was pretty critical to realizing his disillusionment. I mean, if anything he's making an "argument" based more on personal experience than strictly the game on its own. This is really more of a personal story/revelation than, say, a broad deconstruction of indie vs. AAA trends. Or something.
 

Scow2

New member
Aug 3, 2009
801
0
0
I really don't get all the CoD hate... Call of Duty is Call of Duty - you know what you're getting. Call of Duty is not every AAA game ever. A franchise has to stay true to itself.

EA and Activision continued to fund and release more unique, high budget games until the console generation stagnated - they've said it themselves. While the die-hard gamers will buy or at least check out every new release, most gamers only buy a handful of iconic titles until they have a 'full' library, and happily sustain themselves on those until it's time for a new system to wash the New IP market clean. Or, when they're shopping for new games, they look for games they know to be recent and relevant to their friends - and it can be VERY hard to distinguish a game that's been out for 1 year from one that's been out for 5 years. And this generation is notoriously jaded about advertising and hype - and New IPs also get a lot more ire loaded on them than sequels, because there are no preconceptions except from the advertising (How much backlash have Bethesda-published games made again?)

The AAA market has stagnated because gamer's libraries are "full" for this cycle.

... back to playing Titan Quest for me!
 

Dennis Scimeca

New member
Mar 29, 2010
217
0
0
StriderShinryu said:
Hmmm... other than visually, this game doesn't really sound all that new and unique at all. There are a ton of games that have used a base of, or very similar to, CCG mechanics in the recent past. In fact, it was actually something of a meme for a while a few years back to make a "new" genre by just taking an old one and sticking in CCGish mechanics.

I get what the author is saying to some degree, and far be it from me to dump on his own personal positive reaction to a game, but he picked a rather poor example to illustrate his point.
This would normally be the sort of comment one would follow up with examples, for instance other games you're familiar with that blend role playing games, tabletop miniature games, and card mechanic games. I'm sure we'd all love to see a list of all the games you've played that are accomplishing the same thing Card Hunter is accomplishing!

And on the second point, if you think I "picked" a game to illustrate a point you may want to read the column a second time, unless you're suggesting that I should have predicted the future, realized I was going to want to write this column after I got home from PAX while I was at PAX and then chose a different game to spontaneously lead to this realization...wait...
 

ranger19

New member
Nov 19, 2008
492
0
0
Interesting read. That Card Hunter game looks really interesting - I hope the Escapist covers this game when it comes out.

I have a feeling that this burnout is much easier for the media to feel, getting much more exposure to these games (at expos, with free copies) than most consumers. I know for me, on consoles, AAA games make up the majority of the games I play. I'm looking forward to ACIII (despite not having played any of the previous ones), Tomb Raider, The Last of Us, and Halo 4 this fall - whether or not I pick them up, they're some of my more anticipated games this season. And this is coming from someone who does keep up pretty well with the day-to-day life of the industry.

*Shrug* I guess my point is just that it's going to be longer for this burnout to extend enough to consumers to start hurting sales.
 

SAMAS

New member
Aug 27, 2009
337
0
0
The problem most people who complain about AAA games (myself included) have is not exactly with what they are, but the fact that it's all they are.

And it's not just a sameness issue. I don't play first-person shooter games for one reason: Every time I even think of getting an FPS, another four come out.