Well, be happy. It led to something good.matrix3509 said:I am just totally bamboozled (BAMBOOZLED!!!) at that cleric's reasoning.
BAMBOOZLED I SAY!
Unless it leads to a magnitude 9 earthquake, in which it will have led to something bad.
Well, be happy. It led to something good.matrix3509 said:I am just totally bamboozled (BAMBOOZLED!!!) at that cleric's reasoning.
BAMBOOZLED I SAY!
You see, another great mind to help us in our perils!Necromancer1991 said:lol, right and jack thompson thinks GTA is going to cause the 2012 apocalypse.GreatVladmir said:You all know that your wrong right? Hugo Chavez knows what is causing all recent earthquakes, President Obama's seceret death ray. Seesh, some people, they never listen to the experts *rolleyes*
Ok, that theory is as bat-shit crazy as Hugo Chavez's theory on the Haiti earthquake, maybe they could also explain say, Global Warming and the Recession, because it's obvious those two are the greastest Scientific minds since Einstien.
I think you're missing the point. Nobody said that religion sucks, is stupid, or denounced it in any way. However, when somebody that important makes a claim that ridiculous, there's no reason not to laugh in their face.Mackheath said:I had a good laugh at this, as it is proof n-one in the Western world cares about religion. We've all become Egoists.
i am sure he also said to men "dont wear any shorts that show your skin between belly button and knee". that's a sin in Islam too.HentMas said:look, i would agree with you except for the fact that he is basing his belief in an oppenly anti-woman policy, blaming a gender (any gender) for the corruption of mankind is not only sexist, but offensive and... well... stupid, and if he is obvlivious to the fact that he have just offended a whole "GENDER" i am obvlious to the fact that it might be a little rude to laugh about his belief.saejox said:no matter how strange the belief is it is not moral to mock it.
you should stop laughing at him.
No, you're doing it wrong.jthm said:But... but... Science!Space Cowgirl said:Wait, what? They're using breasts... For science? Y'know what, no. No amount of money is going to be able to get me out of my clothing, not even for science.
more of an ass man eh?Julianking93 said:Eh, not much of a boob person myself.
Still, that's an...interesting way of going about things.
Space Cowgirl said:Wait, what? They're using breasts... For science? Y'know what, no. No amount of money is going to be able to get me out of my clothing, not even for science.
no he's more of a [insert joke concerning his sexuality here] person amiright? (i kid, I just couldn't resist)Canid117 said:more of an ass man eh?Julianking93 said:Eh, not much of a boob person myself.
Still, that's an...interesting way of going about things.