Brink Dev: Analog Sticks Are "A Poor Man's Mouse"
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
If all games on the X360 supported a USB keyboard and mouse id switch instantly. I play games exclusively on the PC (and im only slightly elitist about it 
) but not out of some loyalty to the platform, I just genuinely dont like controllers. I'm not saying controllers are bad or that others don't/should not prefer them. This is just my opinion, nothing more.
) but not out of some loyalty to the platform, I just genuinely dont like controllers. I'm not saying controllers are bad or that others don't/should not prefer them. This is just my opinion, nothing more.
Games are cheaper, rigs are more expensive.The Great JT said:
Anyway, this guy's right, however I would disagree with the "poor man's" part.
I would argue it's an option for someone who doesn't really give a damn about trying to configure the best computer with the best graphics ever and just wants to get on with playing.
Consoles are computers, with controllers, that you cannot upgrade or mod. I'm aware that the upgrade comes through cycles, but still.Falru said:
There's less freedom on consoles because it's made for ease of use, plug 'n play if you will. Not to mention adding mouse support to games just gives those that can actually use the scheme an advantage of sorts (though that is still up for debate).
I'm not sure if I reserve any concrete verdict on this one though.
I find it interesting that there are so many people saying pc is better for RPG's I think I am split on that one. RPG's like fallout and Oblivion and the like I can understand but when it comes to something like final fantasy, star ocean, persona, and others like that I much prefer the controller over mouse and keyboard.
Always makes me laugh when people state Pads are better for Shooters than Mice, because I mean if it worked so well on a pad, most games wouldnt need auto aim built into the game, and have it set to default...right? If it needs a crutch to make it work, it obviously doesn't work properly does it?
This is the main reason I don't play FPS's on PC. I find it really difficult to move using WASD, I also hate having to use other keys to reload, crouch etc. Mouse gives you increased accuracy though.......harhol said:
You got the point - they're lazy and stupid. I don't buy PC games anymore, too many bugs and problems. If they make console version significantly inferior, I simply won't buy this game at all.Xvito said:
One thing to consider is that keyboard and mouse need a surface to be put on and used, controllers are held in your hands no matter where you are.
I for one would hate console gaming if it required sitting at my desk instead of hanging in a lazy chair, on the couch or anything similar.
That being said, mouse + keyboard just plays much more comfortably for shooters in my opinion. Much faster aiming, no pad can mimic the speed of your scroll button/hotkey weapon swap or any other moves mapped to your pinky- and thumb-range keys.
Forcing you to use both your thumbs for moving/aiming, 2-4 fingers on shoulderbuttons and 4 to hold the pad limits the number of buttons you can use/actions you can perform while in combat without being crippled/blindsided.
There are games that work better on a pad, and games that work better with mouse/keys. Ham is definately right about shooters.
In case you're wondering; I mostly game on consoles.
I for one would hate console gaming if it required sitting at my desk instead of hanging in a lazy chair, on the couch or anything similar.
That being said, mouse + keyboard just plays much more comfortably for shooters in my opinion. Much faster aiming, no pad can mimic the speed of your scroll button/hotkey weapon swap or any other moves mapped to your pinky- and thumb-range keys.
Forcing you to use both your thumbs for moving/aiming, 2-4 fingers on shoulderbuttons and 4 to hold the pad limits the number of buttons you can use/actions you can perform while in combat without being crippled/blindsided.
There are games that work better on a pad, and games that work better with mouse/keys. Ham is definately right about shooters.
In case you're wondering; I mostly game on consoles.
I have a mouse and keyboard for my Dreamcast.
No, I'm serious [http://www.racketboy.com/retro/2007/03/dreamcast-keyboard-mouse-be-prepared.html]. (And Typing of the Dead, PSO, Quake 3 for it, etc...)
And you can mod consoles, just not as easily most of the time...But I digress.
My computer would calmly, comfortably play Brink at 800x600 on medium settings, and it would be good enough for me because I rather have 80+ FPS than a good looking game, for proper movement/aiming.
And again, it's been statistically proven that a mouse/keyboard setup is more efficient and precise for aiming, etc...
But again, if people think that aim alone will win them any serious, competitive matches, then show me the pro FPS that's played in an open square and is instagib. :/
No, I'm serious [http://www.racketboy.com/retro/2007/03/dreamcast-keyboard-mouse-be-prepared.html]. (And Typing of the Dead, PSO, Quake 3 for it, etc...)
And you can mod consoles, just not as easily most of the time...But I digress.
My computer would calmly, comfortably play Brink at 800x600 on medium settings, and it would be good enough for me because I rather have 80+ FPS than a good looking game, for proper movement/aiming.
And again, it's been statistically proven that a mouse/keyboard setup is more efficient and precise for aiming, etc...
But again, if people think that aim alone will win them any serious, competitive matches, then show me the pro FPS that's played in an open square and is instagib. :/
