Brisingr, I am Beowulf!

Recommended Videos

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
For those of you who didn?t see my last review where I elaborated on the meaning of the title, the topic title is a reference to the ?I am Beowulf!? line and it implies that I?m challenging whatever it is that I happen to be reviewing. What I?m challenging it to do is open to your own interpretations.

All right, then. Last time I reviewed a game that no one really seemed to know about. This time I?m reviewing a book. I know that?s a bit of a gear shift, but I think I can pull it off.

Brisingr is the third book by young author Christopher Paolini, and the second to the last book in the Inheritance Cycle. Brisingr is a sequel to Eldest which was itself a sequel to Eragon, the first book in the cycle. To those who haven?t read or aren?t familiar with the Inheritance cycle, the plot mostly centers around a young Dragon Rider named Eragon and his dragon, Saphira, as they battle against the forces of King Galbatorix, who destroyed the Dragon Riders 100 years ago, and nearly drove the dragons to extinction.

Brisingr picks up shortly after Eldest left off. You don?t have to read for very long before the action heats up, and Eragon and Saphira both get a crowning moment of awesomeness. After that, the action continues at a fast pace, incorporating some interesting and much needed character development on the way. Everything slows down for two or three noticeable intervals, but for the most part it is difficult to get bored when reading this book.

The entire cycle has been told in third person limited. Eragon was told entirely from the perspective of its titular character. Eldest alternated between Eragon and Roran, Eragon?s cousin, for the main perspectives. Brisingr keeps these two perspectives and adds in a third, namely, that of Saphira, Eragon?s dragon. This new viewpoint offers an excellent and much needed look into Saphira?s character. If Paolini continues this trend, we can expect a fourth main perspective to be present in the fourth and final book of the Inheritance cycle.

Since the Inheritance cycle is third person limited, character development can seem lacking in places. I?ve seen some fans and critics decry Paolini for creating ?stale,? characters, especially in the case of Arya, Eragon?s love interest. Paolini addresses this rather skillfully in Brisingr, although I?m not sure if this was his plan all along, or if he just did it to shut up his critics. Either way, Arya?s seemingly cold and unfeeling character is shown to have a great deal of depth, and the reasons behind her distant attitude are explained to some degree.

In my humble opinion, Brisingr shows a vast improvement on the part of Mr. Paolini. He seems to be getting the hang of arranging various aspects of the plot in ways that keep the reader enthralled. With a few exceptions, the battles are exciting, the character development is interesting, and the romance is?well?romantic. The romance between Roran and Katrina is one of the best parts of the entire Inheritance cycle. Paolini even throws in?I?m not entirely sure what to call it?a plot untwist...a double plot twist? Well, whatever it is you?d call a plot twist that debunks an earlier plot twist.
If it seemed like this review is vague at times, I apologize. I just didn?t want to spoil anything for anyone who hasn?t read the previous two books, Eragon and Eldest, and might want to do so. I won?t be vague on what I think of this novel, though! I loved Brisingr. It has its flaws, as anything does, and it?s not going to redefine the fantasy genre, but I enjoyed Brisingr. Why shouldn?t I? It?s like the bastard child of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
Hevoo said:
YOU ARE BEOWULF!

Nice post.

Thank you.

I saw you use that line earlier today in the nationalism thread.

Little did you know that I was using that line as a title for my reviews.
 

TJ rock 101

New member
May 20, 2008
321
0
0
I dont have brisingr yet... i have read the other two and thought they were good.
when i found out who the rider was that attacked eragon in the battle at the end of eldest i went "Woah no wayz!"
 

NewClassic_v1legacy

Bringer of Words
Jul 30, 2008
2,484
0
0
Beowulf DW said:
For those of you who didn?t see my last review where I elaborated on the meaning of the title, the topic title is a reference to the ?I am Beowulf!? line and it implies that I?m challenging whatever it is that I happen to be reviewing.



Why shouldn?t I? It?s like the bastard child of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.
I'm very impressed. You managed to write a plot summary without spoiling anything. But, I'm ashamed to say, you missed the mark of "review" by a long shot. You explained what the tetralogy was, but failed to tell us about the piece itself. (Well, further than fast-paced throughout.)

Considering you're writing this without the intention of spoiling it for anyone who hasn't read the previous books, you could do a lot more to inform the reader about what they're planning on reading. Is the writing complex and intriguing, like Stephen King or Tom Clancy, or are we more inline for very factual texts like Dan Brown? Perhaps something light and unusual, like Chaucer? Or simple and child-like, much like Eoin Colfer and J. K. Rowling?

You spend a lot of time dancing around the "features" of the book series without explaining the content itself. Is the writing mature? Simplistic? Easy to understand? Confusing? Will fans of complex writing like it? Fans of simplistic? What about people who think mixing Star Wars and LotR is a bad idea?

As a blurb for a Wiki page, you did well. As a book review, you need to consider your "review" element more carefully. Although, props for good use of grammar, which is something that can sometimes be blisslessly lacking.

Happy hunting.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
NewClassic said:
Beowulf DW said:
For those of you who didn?t see my last review where I elaborated on the meaning of the title, the topic title is a reference to the ?I am Beowulf!? line and it implies that I?m challenging whatever it is that I happen to be reviewing.



Why shouldn?t I? It?s like the bastard child of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.
I'm very impressed. You managed to write a plot summary without spoiling anything. But, I'm ashamed to say, you missed the mark of "review" by a long shot. You explained what the tetralogy was, but failed to tell us about the piece itself. (Well, further than fast-paced throughout.)

Considering you're writing this without the intention of spoiling it for anyone who hasn't read the previous books, you could do a lot more to inform the reader about what they're planning on reading. Is the writing complex and intriguing, like Stephen King or Tom Clancy, or are we more inline for very factual texts like Dan Brown? Perhaps something light and unusual, like Chaucer? Or simple and child-like, much like Eoin Colfer and J. K. Rowling?

You spend a lot of time dancing around the "features" of the book series without explaining the content itself. Is the writing mature? Simplistic? Easy to understand? Confusing? Will fans of complex writing like it? Fans of simplistic? What about people who think mixing Star Wars and LotR is a bad idea?

As a blurb for a Wiki page, you did well. As a book review, you need to consider your "review" element more carefully. Although, props for good use of grammar, which is something that can sometimes be blisslessly lacking.

Happy hunting.
Thank you for your advice. I had a sinking feeling that I was focusing too much on all the books instead of just the one while I was writing it.

Another "Thank you," for complimenting my grammar. My mom is an English teacher, so proper grammar has been practically chiselled into my mind.

fluffylandmine said:
I've read the first 2 and thought not much good of them.

Will this renew my hope in the series?
It might. The writing is getting better. We're watching the growth of a young author, so you should expect things to get better as time goes on.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
Beowulf DW said:
It might. The writing is getting better. We're watching the growth of a young author, so you should expect things to get better as time goes on.
The cynic in me is forced to say that the growth of a young author is an awkward and ungainly process which should not be forced onto the unsuspecting world through publication.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
GloatingSwine said:
Beowulf DW said:
It might. The writing is getting better. We're watching the growth of a young author, so you should expect things to get better as time goes on.
The cynic in me is forced to say that the growth of a young author is an awkward and ungainly process which should not be forced onto the unsuspecting world through publication.
And yet it's rather appropriate given the context. The Inheritance Cycle is just as much a coming-of-age story as it is a heroic adventure. I've noticed that more...experienced authors sometimes have difficulty capturing just how awkward a time the late-teens are.
 

Archereus

New member
Aug 18, 2008
1,036
0
0
Beowulf DW said:
For those of you who didn?t see my last review where I elaborated on the meaning of the title, the topic title is a reference to the ?I am Beowulf!? line and it implies that I?m challenging whatever it is that I happen to be reviewing. What I?m challenging it to do is open to your own interpretations.

All right, then. Last time I reviewed a game that no one really seemed to know about. This time I?m reviewing a book. I know that?s a bit of a gear shift, but I think I can pull it off.

Brisingr is the third book by young author Christopher Paolini, and the second to the last book in the Inheritance Cycle. Brisingr is a sequel to Eldest which was itself a sequel to Eragon, the first book in the cycle. To those who haven?t read or aren?t familiar with the Inheritance cycle, the plot mostly centers around a young Dragon Rider named Eragon and his dragon, Saphira, as they battle against the forces of King Galbatorix, who destroyed the Dragon Riders 100 years ago, and nearly drove the dragons to extinction.

Brisingr picks up shortly after Eldest left off. You don?t have to read for very long before the action heats up, and Eragon and Saphira both get a crowning moment of awesomeness. After that, the action continues at a fast pace, incorporating some interesting and much needed character development on the way. Everything slows down for two or three noticeable intervals, but for the most part it is difficult to get bored when reading this book.

The entire cycle has been told in third person limited. Eragon was told entirely from the perspective of its titular character. Eldest alternated between Eragon and Roran, Eragon?s cousin, for the main perspectives. Brisingr keeps these two perspectives and adds in a third, namely, that of Saphira, Eragon?s dragon. This new viewpoint offers an excellent and much needed look into Saphira?s character. If Paolini continues this trend, we can expect a fourth main perspective to be present in the fourth and final book of the Inheritance cycle.

Since the Inheritance cycle is third person limited, character development can seem lacking in places. I?ve seen some fans and critics decry Paolini for creating ?stale,? characters, especially in the case of Arya, Eragon?s love interest. Paolini addresses this rather skillfully in Brisingr, although I?m not sure if this was his plan all along, or if he just did it to shut up his critics. Either way, Arya?s seemingly cold and unfeeling character is shown to have a great deal of depth, and the reasons behind her distant attitude are explained to some degree.

In my humble opinion, Brisingr shows a vast improvement on the part of Mr. Paolini. He seems to be getting the hang of arranging various aspects of the plot in ways that keep the reader enthralled. With a few exceptions, the battles are exciting, the character development is interesting, and the romance is?well?romantic. The romance between Roran and Katrina is one of the best parts of the entire Inheritance cycle. Paolini even throws in?I?m not entirely sure what to call it?a plot untwist...a double plot twist? Well, whatever it is you?d call a plot twist that debunks an earlier plot twist.
If it seemed like this review is vague at times, I apologize. I just didn?t want to spoil anything for anyone who hasn?t read the previous two books, Eragon and Eldest, and might want to do so. I won?t be vague on what I think of this novel, though! I loved Brisingr. It has its flaws, as anything does, and it?s not going to redefine the fantasy genre, but I enjoyed Brisingr. Why shouldn?t I? It?s like the bastard child of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.
i am with you all theway on this one, iam a big fan of the books, not the movie nor games, but i like the books so much because it explains its logics, in the book magic just aint magic, its a complicated thing to do, its not like Unforgotten Realms where you say your spell and it happens, you can tell he put much effort into his books, his books are logic and it has some know how, thats why i love the books, theres more to it then the plot, theres the histories of the various races, how the magic works, all the traditions they up hold, theres so much more to it all then the plot which is the thing that attached me to the book, i am sad you didnt mention that
 

Mstrswrd

Always playing Touhou. Always.
Mar 2, 2008
1,724
0
0
I actually have this book but have yet to read it because I have to re-read the first two books. I have a bad memory so... yeah. I can't wait to read the crowning moment of awesomeness.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
Mstrswrd said:
I actually have this book but have yet to read it because I hav to re-read the first two books. I have a bad memory so... yeah. I can't wait to read the crowning moment of awesomeness.
Well, get with the reading my friend, because when I said "crowning moment of awesomeness," I meant it! I almost hopped out of my chair and started cheering for Saphira while I was reading.
 

Rusty Bucket

New member
Dec 2, 2008
1,587
0
0
I have to say i disagree on the fast paced bit. I thought this book was incredibly slow moving. There was an awful lot of content that didnt push the story forward much or develop characters. I reckon he could have cut a good 1/4 of the content from this book and still have it work well. I hope the final book is an improvement over this.
 

IrrelevantTangent

New member
Oct 4, 2008
2,424
0
0
GloatingSwine said:
Beowulf DW said:
It might. The writing is getting better. We're watching the growth of a young author, so you should expect things to get better as time goes on.
The cynic in me is forced to say that the growth of a young author is an awkward and ungainly process which should not be forced onto the unsuspecting world through publication.
J.K. Rowling would like a few words with you.
 

rayman 101

New member
Jun 7, 2008
315
0
0
I love the Inheretance cycle (hate the movie and games)! I thought you did a good review, although you didn't really summarise what the lasting appeal was. Although I thought Brisingr was pretty good, I felt as if it was beating around the bush and just warming itself up for the next installment. Yes, there were many plot twists, epic battles, revelations about the characters and a major develepmont, but it also had a cliff-hanger ending that really didn't resolve anything, points where it just drags on with the story and nothing really happens (although never really gets boring). I've been waiting in enticipation for Brisingr, and although I wouldn't really call it disapointing, I'm not exactly 100% satisfied. Let's hope the Mr. Paolini's next installment of the Inheretance Cycle is realesed in the near future.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
rayman 101 said:
I love the Inheretance cycle (hate the movie and games)! I thought you did a good review, although you didn't really summarise what the lasting appeal was. Although I thought Brisingr was pretty good, I felt as if it was beating around the bush and just warming itself up for the next installment. Yes, there were many plot twists, epic battles, revelations about the characters and a major develepmont, but it also had a cliff-hanger ending that really didn't resolve anything, points where it just drags on with the story and nothing really happens (although never really gets boring). I've been waiting in enticipation for Brisingr, and although I wouldn't really call it disapointing, I'm not exactly 100% satisfied. Let's hope the Mr. Paolini's next installment of the Inheretance Cycle is realesed in the near future.
Well...Brisingr and the next book were originally planned to be one whole book, but cut split in two due to length. I started reading with that in mind, and I more or less expected this. And this IS a four book cycle; you can't expect 100% resolution until the very end of the last book. I thought that Paolini pulled off the ending quite nicely given the circumstances.