I never said her reasoning was correct, only that to people like her that is more than enough proof that video games cause an interest in firearms. In fact I'd say whether or not it's true, it is still far stronger evidence than your "video games cause violence" based on the "video games cause a temporary increase in aggression, and aggressive people are more likely to be violent" proof.Mycroft Holmes said:That's two data points with no visible scientific connection. You need more information than that to make a correlation. Otherwise you're basically just making a guess based on what you think might be true. It could just as easily be the opposite relationship or anything in between. People who want to buy guns could simply be more likely to buy videogames in the first place. Or people who want to buy guys and who want to play videogames might simply be mostly middle class suburbanites and therefore the two overlap because of that simple correlation.JSF01 said:It also found that high school students that regularly play video games were 50% more likely to report plans on owning a firearm.
It would be like seeing a correlation between artisan sandwich consumption and coffee consumption and immediately going ah hah! eating artisan sandwiches automatically leads to coffee consumption. But maybe it's just people hanging out at Starbucks a lot. You follow?
Those guns are already pretty amazingly regulated. Have you looked up stats on how many violent crimes are committed by a licensed firearm owner? It's like 3% or less. The "problem" that the country has is not legal gun owners or the already incredibly strict policy regarding licensing and registration, it's the abundantly available black market weapons that are used to commit the majority of violent crimes - and no amount of "gun control" laws aimed at legal owners (who are already not the problem) are going to fix the availability of black market firearms.aegix drakan said:Wait, LESS guns?! But...but...MY BORDERLANDS!! MY BAZILLIONS OF GUNS!!! :O NOOOOOO!
Also, I find it depressingly hilarious that some people are more aggressive about regulating FAKE DIGITAL GUNS than about regulating the REAL guns, that ACTUALLY kill people.
I think I remember reading that the person that had liked Mass Effect on Facebook wasn't even related to the shooter at all and the media stuffed it up.Jennacide said:Funny story, Sandy Hook had NOTHING TO DO WITH VIDEOGAMES.
He wasn't known for playing violent games, that was just the media struggling to find a connection. And you know what connection they made a huge reach to claim? He liked violent games because his brother Liked Mass Effect on Facebook.
St Thomas Island is actually worse than DC (hell, they had more murders per capita than Baghdad for some years of the war), though not as big. But we like to pretend that the territories aren't part of the country.Desert Punk said:Huh you know, after doing a bit of research, it seems the thing that is fucking the united states over most when it comes to guns, is our fucking nations capital!
Deaths by guns per 100k pop: 16.5
The next closest is Luisiana at 7.7
Only solution to even out the problem? Nuke washington DC, it will have the added benefit of ridding us of all the idiotic politicians as well! (For those too dense to get it, this last part was a joke)