dogstile said:
He earned the money, he can do what he wants with it.
*turns on 80s mode*
Take a chill pill dude
Yeah you are right, he can but it sickens me that he used the money in this way. He can do whatever he likes with his money but to me personally I find it offensive
You are right but the way people spend their money pisses me off.
Ephraim J. Witchwood said:
im2fools on the kotaku page for this said:
For all the people who are complaining about how this much money could feed x number of people. It did. The money wasn't fed into a shredder. It payed salaries for the mall. It payed salaries for the factory workers who built the electronics. It payed salaries for the electric company employees. It payed for groceries for all their families. It payed for trucks transporting the groceries. It payed for farmers growing the vegetables. It payed for the cattle turned into steak. It payed the taxes on all of the above. If we're not going to limit what people can make, then we should expect them to spend it frivolously. Money must circulate, or it kills an economy.
They are on wages already
They aren't finding it difficult to feed their families
They aren't in the streets begging for scraps
The workers are on fixed salaries and will get paid a set amount, maybe a performance bonus but that won't get any extra money for this.
You know who will get more money though? The executives, the ones who get the most out of the profit. Nearly all companies work like this, the average worker is unlikely to get paid more especially in a country where human rights are so bad
The executives will get the money and they will be sitting on a bed of this guys money.
Now you're just trolling.
You're comparing a TV in size to Jesus Christ's popularity. Jesus was popular, the TV is big. Comparing the two makes very little sense in my head
Don said:
@ The Rockerfly. How do you know this guy doesn't support a charity already? You're making gross judgements based on very limited information in this article. Do you also berate people who drive luxury cars like Porches? Do you boycott companies like Nestle to protect infant deaths, or Coke due to how they rip water from local aquifers. Are you going to forgo your next game purchase and donate that to someone homeless or hungry? It's easy to take the moral highground and denounce what you consider largess or greed. Be realistic though, or you just make yourself look like a twat.
If you are going to insult me at least quote me otherwise I have no way to respond
That argument works both ways, how do you know he's not? Consider the average human being, how many donates money, works down at charity shops or soup kitchens? How many people do you know do that? Not many I am sure
On average, most human beings will do fuck all for charity, statistically speaking. We are a greedy race, especially in a country obsessed with money like China. Therefore I am going to bold assume that he doesn't give money to charity
No I do not protest infant deaths, infants are easy to recreate (9 months plus a few extra to grow and boom, infant is less than a year. A grown human being dying is much sadder to me especially when we live in a world with so much disposable income
I am realistic, if you gave me $15,000 to spend on a big TV for the night or giving it to a hospital or cancer research (or any other charity of my choice) I would choose the charity every time