I believe there was no question as to whether the sword was loaded.Casual Shinji said:You gotta ask yourself one question; Do I feel lucky?
Well, do ya? panku
^.^
I believe there was no question as to whether the sword was loaded.Casual Shinji said:You gotta ask yourself one question; Do I feel lucky?
Well, do ya? panku
Definitely not a Hattori Hanzo.The_Oracle said:I only have one question in response to this:
Was it a Hattori Hanzo sword?
Make of that what you will. [sub]I can't believe I'm so geeky that all I thought of was Kill Bill when I first read this. It's [the katana incident] still a pretty badass feat, though.[/sub]
Quoted for truth!Khell_Sennet said:And Cthulhu damn Canada for not having this law.
On this note, I must add that I rolled a die 20 for our dear college student.KeyMaster45 said:And they all laughed at me when I sharpened my life size Master Sword HA! this proves its a viable way to protect my home; burglars and miscreants beware, my house has a +12 defense bonus.
I've got a bastard sword...DeathWyrmNexus said:Good thing I have a scimitar. XDStarke said:I remember a cop once explaining that the best weapon to defend yourself with in most homes is a longsword. Handguns over penetrate, and during an adrenaline rush it's very easy to miss with a handgun. Shotguns have the over penetration problem as well, and aren't very effective in closed quarters if you're not very proficient. Knife fighting is a very VERY dangerous thing to do. But a sword gives you plenty of reach, and the risk of the other guy carrying one to pull on you is very slim.
Until you discover afterward that the perp was standing in front of your Plasma. Happy as I would be after having defended my home that would still piss me off.Amnestic said:Over penetration is a bad thing? I'm not normally all for guns in the home but if I'm pulling a lethal weapon on an intruder I wanna be sure that anyone I'm protecting is going to be safe.Shotguns have the over penetration problem as well, and aren't very effective in closed quarters if you're not very proficient.
I can always replace the carpet. I can't really replace a family member.
Also, 'not very proficient'? If you're 'not very proficient' with a longsword you're going to end up swinging it like a baseball bat. Slapping someone with the flat edge of the blade isn't nearly as effective as smacking someone with...say, a cricket bat.
Maybe, but he would more likely be toting a crowbar, as I keep beside my bed. In afterthought, I wasn't even thinking of Half Life when I put it there...HardRockSamurai said:Hang on a sec...a CHEMISTRY MAJOR???
KILLING SOMEONE???
By chance, did he look anything like this?
It did escalate. The problem started at the intruder's collarbone, escalated to his first rib, escalated again to his second rib, and continued to escalate until the issue was resolved at the other side.Chipperz said:I get the impression the confrontation didn't escalate so much as the sword just kept goingUsefulPlayer 1 said:Killing him, methinks, was unnecessary, but it's not like it was unprovoked. I just can't see how the confrontation escalate any further after he almost cut the guy's hand off.
It doesn't matter, there will soon be a scientist in your neighboorhood kicking everyone's ass.Amnestic said:Isn't Gordon Freeman a theoretical physicist rather than a Chemistry guy?HardRockSamurai said:Hang on a sec...a CHEMISTRY MAJOR???
KILLING SOMEONE???
By chance, did he look anything like this?
You are so cute, I just want to hug you.Archon said:This is shocking.
I, for one, think we need to begin to look at sword control. If this college student didn't have access to a dangerous bladed weapon, a man would not have died yesterday. And what if the intruder had a sword? Then there conflict would have escalated into a swordfight! Who knows who might have gotten hurt - including innocents.
And let's not the forget the children. Sword violence is a childhood pandemic: Just yesterday I saw two kids in my neighborhood training for the sort of gruesome violence that occurred on this college campus. Entire industries are devoted to creating swords and sword simulators for children. Meanwhile, violent "fighting" games teach our children that these sorts of tools, which were designed for WARRIORS, are for fun.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, street gangs are already using swords to engage in acts of terror, assault, and robbery. We don't want that to happen in America.
It's important that we act now, before another child dies to a sword. That's why I hope you'll support HR-42.666.69, the Sword And Blade Elimination/Reduction (SABER) Act. It begins by comprehensively banning all "assault swords" with blades that are obviously based on military designs, and institutes instant background checks on any citizen who attempts to purchase a sword or blade.
And you, sir, win. As a fellow Alexander, I shall call you "Alexander the Great."Archon said:This is shocking.
I, for one, think we need to begin to look at sword control. If this college student didn't have access to a dangerous bladed weapon, a man would not have died yesterday. And what if the intruder had a sword? Then there conflict would have escalated into a swordfight! Who knows who might have gotten hurt - including innocents.
And let's not the forget the children. Sword violence is a childhood pandemic: Just yesterday I saw two kids in my neighborhood training for the sort of gruesome violence that occurred on this college campus. Entire industries are devoted to creating swords and sword simulators for children. Meanwhile, violent "fighting" games teach our children that these sorts of tools, which were designed for WARRIORS, are for fun.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, street gangs are already using swords to engage in acts of terror, assault, and robbery. We don't want that to happen in America.
It's important that we act now, before another child dies to a sword. That's why I hope you'll support HR-42.666.69, the Sword And Blade Elimination/Reduction (SABER) Act. It begins by comprehensively banning all "assault swords" with blades that are obviously based on military designs, and institutes instant background checks on any citizen who attempts to purchase a sword or blade.
I'm not sure if this is serious or not, given the general attitude at the Escapist, It sounds serious, but I'm not quite sure, maybe my sarcasm meter is broken. but if you are serious then you're going to have to put up with everyone acting like an immature dick for a bit.Archon said:This is shocking.
I, for one, think we need to begin to look at sword control. If this college student didn't have access to a dangerous bladed weapon, a man would not have died yesterday. And what if the intruder had a sword? Then there conflict would have escalated into a swordfight! Who knows who might have gotten hurt - including innocents.
And let's not the forget the children. Sword violence is a childhood pandemic: Just yesterday I saw two kids in my neighborhood training for the sort of gruesome violence that occurred on this college campus. Entire industries are devoted to creating swords and sword simulators for children. Meanwhile, violent "fighting" games teach our children that these sorts of tools, which were designed for WARRIORS, are for fun.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, street gangs are already using swords to engage in acts of terror, assault, and robbery. We don't want that to happen in America.
It's important that we act now, before another child dies to a sword. That's why I hope you'll support HR-42.666.69, the Sword And Blade Elimination/Reduction (SABER) Act. It begins by comprehensively banning all "assault swords" with blades that are obviously based on military designs, and institutes instant background checks on any citizen who attempts to purchase a sword or blade.
I'm 95% certain that was satire. He had me going for the first paragraph but after that...nyeh, can't take it seriously.randommaster said:I'm not sure if this is serious or not, given the general attitude at the Escapist, but if you are serious then you're going to have to put up with everyone acting like an immature dick for a bit.Archon said:This is shocking.
I, for one, think we need to begin to look at sword control. If this college student didn't have access to a dangerous bladed weapon, a man would not have died yesterday. And what if the intruder had a sword? Then there conflict would have escalated into a swordfight! Who knows who might have gotten hurt - including innocents.
And let's not the forget the children. Sword violence is a childhood pandemic: Just yesterday I saw two kids in my neighborhood training for the sort of gruesome violence that occurred on this college campus. Entire industries are devoted to creating swords and sword simulators for children. Meanwhile, violent "fighting" games teach our children that these sorts of tools, which were designed for WARRIORS, are for fun.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, street gangs are already using swords to engage in acts of terror, assault, and robbery. We don't want that to happen in America.
It's important that we act now, before another child dies to a sword. That's why I hope you'll support HR-42.666.69, the Sword And Blade Elimination/Reduction (SABER) Act. It begins by comprehensively banning all "assault swords" with blades that are obviously based on military designs, and institutes instant background checks on any citizen who attempts to purchase a sword or blade.
There's always that one person who has to be a wet blanket, so somethines it's hard to tell. Seems like people generally see this as awesome, though.Amnestic said:I'm 95% certain that was satire. He had me going for the first paragraph but after that...nyeh, can't take it seriously.randommaster said:I'm not sure if this is serious or not, given the general attitude at the Escapist, but if you are serious then you're going to have to put up with everyone acting like an immature dick for a bit.Archon said:This is shocking.
I, for one, think we need to begin to look at sword control. If this college student didn't have access to a dangerous bladed weapon, a man would not have died yesterday. And what if the intruder had a sword? Then there conflict would have escalated into a swordfight! Who knows who might have gotten hurt - including innocents.
And let's not the forget the children. Sword violence is a childhood pandemic: Just yesterday I saw two kids in my neighborhood training for the sort of gruesome violence that occurred on this college campus. Entire industries are devoted to creating swords and sword simulators for children. Meanwhile, violent "fighting" games teach our children that these sorts of tools, which were designed for WARRIORS, are for fun.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, street gangs are already using swords to engage in acts of terror, assault, and robbery. We don't want that to happen in America.
It's important that we act now, before another child dies to a sword. That's why I hope you'll support HR-42.666.69, the Sword And Blade Elimination/Reduction (SABER) Act. It begins by comprehensively banning all "assault swords" with blades that are obviously based on military designs, and institutes instant background checks on any citizen who attempts to purchase a sword or blade.
Swing responsibly, a hand and a half sword might make a wild swing and take out your console. XDStarke said:I've got a bastard sword...DeathWyrmNexus said:Good thing I have a scimitar. XDStarke said:I remember a cop once explaining that the best weapon to defend yourself with in most homes is a longsword. Handguns over penetrate, and during an adrenaline rush it's very easy to miss with a handgun. Shotguns have the over penetration problem as well, and aren't very effective in closed quarters if you're not very proficient. Knife fighting is a very VERY dangerous thing to do. But a sword gives you plenty of reach, and the risk of the other guy carrying one to pull on you is very slim.