Bioshock was a total alternate universe and did not include any other historical events from the time period of its setting, so I'm ok with that. I don't know what Black Ops' story will be like, but if comes straight out and makes it clear that this is not supposed to be historically accurate, that'll be fine too. What would bother me is if the game followed the major events of the Cold War faithfully but then decided "Lol, lets go assassinate Castro because it would be cool" and pretended like that was part of history.crepesack said:Judging from the fact that the game is about a secret military project of super soldiers and that you have crossbows with the same accuracy as a gun this game is by far not a historical piece. It's like saying Bioshock is lame or stupid because they changed the way 50s science evolved...It's dumb logic.jwien001 said:It's called Dead Ops Arcade. I have a feeling that's gonna be the extended zombie mode (or modes).ianrocks6495 said:This game sounds fun just from the achievements. What's the Black Ops Arcade?
OT: Killing Castro sounds cool and all, but I don't like the idea of retconning actual history, unless they're going for a total alternate universe Cold War. I know the Call of Duty franchise has never really been about realism, but don't throw one or two fictional historical events into a game based around factual historical events just because it's cool.