Cooking Mama: The PETA Version

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
Brilliant fun I enjoyed massacring a turkey with the help of a homicidal little women. FUN the brilliant thing is I just sent this to my PETA loving "friend" and she belives that something so horrible could be made by peta oh well this game has now taught me how to cook a Turkey now I just need to find one and rip out its innards happy days
 

Blank__

New member
Oct 9, 2008
78
0
0
Why are they picking on Cooking Mama? Because the game has meat in it? Now I understand why lawsuits exist.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
Plants emit the chemical equivalent of a scream, that means they suffer the entire time you eat them.

While they don't process it like we do, certain responses (ex. THC in Cannibis, it's a defense mechanism) show that plants are CLEARLY averse to being eaten. Sorry, Vegitables want to provide you with energy about as much as animals do, they just don't feel pain in the same manner we do. The only things that "want" you to eat them are fruit trees, and that's only to disperse seeds.
 

I3uster

New member
Nov 16, 2008
409
0
0
plants dont feel pain nor have emotions, that being said, i could easily slaughter and eat half of hollywood (ba-dum-tish)
 

Dr Pussymagnet

a real piece of shit
Dec 20, 2007
1,243
0
0
I remember there being an anti KFC flash game a while back that was almost the exact same as Mario, except it was two baby chicks instead of two italian plumbers, and because Pamela Anderson was part of this anit-KFC campaign, I guess they decided to make her the princess.

And If I remember correctly, I think Nintendo tried to sue them for copyright issues.(Please, correct me if I'm wrong)
 

AntiAntagonist

Neither good or bad
Apr 17, 2008
652
0
0
Funny how the only game mechanic that separates the meat & veg scenes is that the turkey is slightly harder.

The sawing motion doesn't register very well due to acceleration/deceleration functions on the knife cursor.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
I3uster said:
plants dont feel pain nor have emotions, that being said, i could easily slaughter and eat half of hollywood (ba-dum-tish)
Does that mean it's ethical to eat a benign sociopath with a nervous system disorder (ex. he doesn't feel pain)?

He clearly doesn't want to be eaten and he will respond in his own way. Plants emit a chemical response as a deterant to their animal eaters, in some cases poison, in some cases
an opiate and sometimes just a harmless chemical "scream".

EDIT: I completely missed your awesome joke.
 

Bored Tomatoe

New member
Aug 15, 2008
3,619
0
0
I watched the turkey slaughter video, and was totally unaffected, except for hunger. (Damn now Im hungry, thanks PETA....)
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
Isn't this copyright material? I mean, they used the name of the series. I can't believe that(even) PETA would make such a huge and obvious blunder though. Perhaps its protected as a parody? If not, I want to keep track of the awesome lawsuit that is coming.
 

I3uster

New member
Nov 16, 2008
409
0
0
i wont eat a being that is capable of feeling pain, but i could eat a 2-month-comatose-patient, but this thread isnt called "lets find out what Buster would eat"
 

Hunde Des Krieg

New member
Sep 30, 2008
2,442
0
0
I3uster said:
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Does PeTA have any idea how nature works? Nature is far more cruel than humanity is. Half of all prey animals in the wild are eaten while they are still partially alive or have to suffer slow horrible deaths. They do realize that the animals we raise for livestock are practically immune from extinction? yes there are many animals that suffer before they are butchered, and those responsible should be punished, these are the animals raised in factory settings. Animals raised outside on natural foods live better lives and taste better too. They are killed quickly and humanely, and help to feed humanity.
i dont think that it is cruel to kill animals, but thinks it is cruel how they are held and killed (the WAY of killing matters here)
It is cruel when they are held upside-down and have their throats cut, and they slowly bleed out, but a quick bolt through the head and they're gone, no pain, no suffering. Beheaded? yep gone, no pian, and don't think the whole chicken with its head cut off thing means pain, the animals head is off.

but nature is far more cruel, lions slowly choking their prey to death, wolves harrassing and exhausting prey to death, pythons and boas crushing their prey to death. Need I go on? as long as animals get to live outside, and eat natural food, reproduce, and die a fast painless death, then what's the problem?
 

Hunde Des Krieg

New member
Sep 30, 2008
2,442
0
0
PedroSteckecilo said:
Plants emit the chemical equivalent of a scream, that means they suffer the entire time you eat them.

While they don't process it like we do, certain responses (ex. THC in Cannibis, it's a defense mechanism) show that plants are CLEARLY averse to being eaten. Sorry, Vegitables want to provide you with energy about as much as animals do, they just don't feel pain in the same manner we do. The only things that "want" you to eat them are fruit trees, and that's only to disperse seeds.
Ah, now that is correct. Finally someone who understands nature.
 

PatientGrasshopper

New member
Nov 2, 2008
624
0
0
Although I have quite a few problems with PETA this game sounds fun I mean anmials kill and eat other animals in a grizzly manner why doesn't PETA have a problem with tthat?
 

PatientGrasshopper

New member
Nov 2, 2008
624
0
0
paulgruberman said:
Virgil said:
it definitely has too much "whacko" in it
This sums up PETA.

They're graduating from the "going overboard" school of propaganda to "the big lie".
Oh they have always been propagandizing people despite the fact that they themselvs put animals to sleep that they can't do anything with.