Copyright Lawsuits Come to Canada

Aureliano

New member
Mar 5, 2009
604
0
0
Here's a suggestion: companies are free to file lawsuits against private citizens for copyright violation (specifically for home use or dissemination as opposed to outright selling), but if those companies lose they must pay the legal fees for the defendants as well as an equal fine to a special anti-trust commission in that country tasked with breaking up monopolies on intellectual properties not created by anyone who ever worked for said company.

I expect that would clear up all this post-Metallica nonsense in about a week.
 

aceman67

New member
Jan 14, 2010
259
0
0
Timedraven 117 said:
They are asking for ten grand for a movie that was not even that good, (From what i know).
The movie was quite good (Its on Netflix if you want to watch it, assuming you're a subscriber). It won the following Oscars, as well as 92 other awards, and nominated for another 165:

  • Best Picture
    Best Director
    Best Original Screenplay
    Best Editing
    Best Sound Mixing
    Best Sound Editing

But be warned, there is one scene that involves a child that is quite disturbing.

I do find it funny that this article is almost a year late, since in August 29, 2011, Federal Court ordered Bell, Cogeco and Videotron to release customer information about people suspected of downloading the movie and were given 2 weeks to comply, and as far as I know, nothing has come of it.

For once, I'm actually glad I'm a Shaw customer...
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
during this whole year the piracy fighters were roaring. and now awe start seeing them loose courts too. the time of torrents are coming to an end, just like emule and dc++ ended. soon a new protocol will spring and get popular and we will forget all about torrent.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
The way I see things is that Canadians have always been pretty ignorant when it comes to a lot of things, especially those ways they claim to be "better" than the US. I think it was pretty obvious we'd be seeing this happen due to all the Canadians running around talking about how they could pretty much pirate any copyrighted work they wanted without repercussions, and stuff about how their goverment was simply effectively paying a fee on it's terms for what it felt it was worth for it's people to do this. Obviously this wasn't going to fly, though the politicians are now in a position where they have to stand behind their claims that there wasn't going to be copyright enforcement of this sort and the goverment could choose simply not to have it, while at the same time enforcing copyrights.

What changed? Well there are two big things.


1.: The lesser one, and what will PO Canadians more than anything else is simply that Canada wasn't seen as being a big enough deal for a while, thus there was no real desire to put REAL pressure on Canada. That's changed, and when you get down to it Canada is pretty small potatoes and now that corperate interestes backed by the USA are starting to see Canada as more of a problem, it really can't deal with it, and is going to have to change as we're seeing in this case.

2.: While it's been a bit quieter for the moment, some of you might have noticed a lot of rumbling about patent and copyright violations by the eastern world where they simply refuse to acknowlege the laws of other nations to protect their own ideas, leading to knock offs, and robber economies pretty much decimating the global economy and contributing heavily to the recession in the first world, as to preverse peace nations like the USA had been borrowing money from the same people stealing from/knocking off their products to pay their bills.

Simply put the western world has been too divided to really take a serious case about this, despite everyone involved having their own interests. A lot of the stuff directed at China has quieted down for the moment, and you've seen a lot more attention being paid through the western world, with the situation we're seeing now in Canada just being the latest and greatest case, standing out because as the article itself points out, this is pretty much exactly the kind of thing that Canada tried to ensure wasn't going to be an issue. Your largely seeing the western world starting to close ranks (or force them closed when the need arises) and get it's house in order to more efficiently fight this issue. It's hard to really take a stand against nations like China, when they can point a finger at how a nation like Canada that is closely allied with those making the complaints (like the US and various first world European countries) publically violates all the same laws China is being hated on for. You can't really say it's effectiely okay for Canada to do fundementally the same thing your working on forcing China and other robber economies to stop doing.

While not popular with the left wing, I think even the leadership of very leftist first world nations have been taking notice of the same things I've been talking about for years. China's huge military build up with little in the way of social improvement (still operating the sweatshops and knockoff factories). The general attitude that more money going into China would lead to a higher standard of living, closing the sweatshops, and forcing more parity due to more worker demands as they money came rolling in has proven false. China still steals everything, knocks it off, and then takes the money and puts it into their military. When China has just rolled out it's first aircraft carrier, paid for with it's robber economy, people tend to take notice, and it becomes increasingly hard to defend their practices for humanitarian principles.

I think the attempt to force robber economies down non-violently and make a stand this way will ultimatly fail, due to it being too late, that's what the big players building up their military was all about (ie it will take a war to stop them from bleeding the rest of the world). It's still going to be attempted though, and towards that end a united front is being created.

Not to mention that Canada itself has a decent number of patents and copyrights at risk here as well. Canada has to some extent wanted to play the game of QQing about their losses to robber economies, while wanting to pretty much ignore the claims by other first world nations. In the long term I think there is some realization slipping in that lawsuits over pirated media and patent violations and such might be annoying, but are a lesser evil than what nations like China have been up to, and the revenue they have been losing to those sources as opposed to what has been being saved by refusing to acknowlege the rights of IP holders.

A lot of people, especially Canadians, will probably jump all over this, but that's the basic trend. No matter how the current case ends I think Canada is going to eventually yield to pressure, especially seeing as it's own best interests are served that way in the long term.

Other players other than the US behind this if you've paid attention, include France and Germany. China has basically stolen trillions of dollars from them (along with the US) in drugs alone. Pfizers while international with complexes in the US is largely a French company, and Germany is the parent nation behind Merck. Viagra alone has been a huge deal because of Asian knockoffs using the stolen/duplicated formula being released internationally. When it comes to drug companies in paticular it's a huge deal because of the massive investment of resources in experimenting and rendering this stuff safe, with tighter and tighter standards, someone who hasn't had to spend billions making and testing the stuff just taking the finished formula and knocking it off is a paticular problem for example. Those thefts not only cost the companies money but also nations that lose the trade and tax revenues, and of course that money goes into things like say... China buying Aircraft Carriers. Extend that into everything from electronic devices, to intellectual properties (like we're talking about here), and you can see why the first world countries that create this kind of stuff have been getting upset, and gradually beginning to realize that if we're going to have any chance at all we're going to have to get off each other's cases, and that involves gradually pressuring countries like Canada into line.

That's how it seems to be going, give it a few years, and even if you spent a lot of time argueing and "debunking" what I'm saying here in my mind, and you'll see I was absolutly right, not that I expect it to amount to a hill of beans honestly, too little too late.
 

Living Contradiction

Clearly obfusticated
Nov 8, 2009
337
0
0
Did a little digging on Canadian copyright law to see if Voltage has a hope. Answer? Nope. http://www.balancedcopyright.gc.ca/eic/site/crp-prda.nsf/eng/h_rp01153.html#amend

For those who don't want to wade through the bill, if you want to bring a lawsuit against folks for ripping off your movie/song/porn/etc., you're welcome, but you're limited to damages of $100 to $5000 for all infringements that took place prior to the lawsuit being filed. If someone is dumb enough to rip you off after the lawsuit hits the streets, the amount rises to $500 to $20,000.

Did Voltage already file a lawsuit? Yep, and they gave up on March 28th without giving a reason. This might've had to do with the fact that their last U.S. lawsuit went down in flames because they couldn't actually name their defendants. http://torrentfreak.com/hurt-locker-bittorrent-lawsuit-dies-but-not-without-controversy-111222/

So sorry, Voltage, but you're going to have to either lower your expectations or pack up your circus and go home.

canadamus_prime said:
gigastar said:
Another week another copyright lawsuit.

canadamus_prime said:
You know, I think all copyright lawyers should be rounded up and dumped into a volcano, and while were at it we should dump Voltage Pictures in there with 'em.
No, no, thats not how you execute copyright lawyers. Volcanoes are for rabid fanboys.

You round them up and lock them in a industrial scale refrigerator set at -5C and leave one knife between them.

And make sure they have a steady supply of water.
Oh sorry, my mistake. ...wait what good would that do? Lawyers don't freeze.
Heh. That's the point. You put cameras in the fridge and then you have a brand new reality show for cable.
 

XMark

New member
Jan 25, 2010
1,408
0
0
Wouldn't giving the browsing information of thousands of users to Voltage be a massive breach of privacy? And wouldn't the ISPs then be legally liable for said massive privacy breach?
 

Ledan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
798
0
0
Wait, I'm in Canada and I recently heard from some Canadians that they put an upper limit of 5,000 on piracy. As in, you can't be sued for more than 5,000 for downloading media content.
This should prove to be interesting.
 

Jodan

New member
Mar 18, 2009
379
0
0
RedDeadFred said:
Jodan said:
hum
speaking as a canadian this could set precedents here and should be watched closeley.
also speaking as a canadian I think im going to download the hurt locker right now out of spite
I would edit out that end part before a mod sees it...

OT: While this doesn't affect me, it's still a pretty ridiculous overreaction. The Hurt Locker only made about 50 million dollars. 10000 per 2000 people is 20 million right there. They have incredibly infalted projections for how this movie is going to do I think...
im walking a fine line with that comment yes, but i never acctually expressed that i was going to pirate it(sinister carful wording). I acctually have no intention of seeing this movie again or even supporting the production house. for even if i did add myself to the number of people pirating Voltage Pictures movies, i would be adding to the awareness of their works and in turn, i beleive would be indirectly supporting them.
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,896
0
0
Jodan said:
RedDeadFred said:
Jodan said:
hum
speaking as a canadian this could set precedents here and should be watched closeley.
also speaking as a canadian I think im going to download the hurt locker right now out of spite
I would edit out that end part before a mod sees it...

OT: While this doesn't affect me, it's still a pretty ridiculous overreaction. The Hurt Locker only made about 50 million dollars. 10000 per 2000 people is 20 million right there. They have incredibly infalted projections for how this movie is going to do I think...
im walking a fine line with that comment yes, but i never acctually expressed that i was going to pirate it(sinister carful wording). I acctually have no intention of seeing this movie again or even supporting the production house. for even if i did add myself to the number of people pirating Voltage Pictures movies, i would be adding to the awareness of their works and in turn, i beleive would be indirectly supporting them.
Haha fair enough I guess. I completely agree with you by the way. Downloading something is raising awareness of that product and may actually help it.
 

crazyrabbits

New member
Jul 10, 2012
472
0
0
Living Contradiction said:
Did Voltage already file a lawsuit? Yep, and they gave up on March 28th without giving a reason. This might've had to do with the fact that their last U.S. lawsuit went down in flames because they couldn't actually name their defendants. http://torrentfreak.com/hurt-locker-bittorrent-lawsuit-dies-but-not-without-controversy-111222/
I had thought that they could have at least tried to identify the downloaders by their IP, but I guess that's beyond them? They're still (much like the rest of Hollywood) far, far behind the times when it comes to understanding piracy. I agree with all your points.

CAPTCHA: do you shop at Canadian Tire? Yes, I do.
 

Nielas

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2011
264
5
23
XMark said:
Wouldn't giving the browsing information of thousands of users to Voltage be a massive breach of privacy? And wouldn't the ISPs then be legally liable for said massive privacy breach?
That's why the ISP requested a court order for the release of the information.

Also they were not asking about browsing information. They already knew the IP addresses of the people distributing the video and asked the ISP to tell them the real identities of people who used those IP addresses.
 

Fluffythepoo

New member
Sep 29, 2011
445
0
0
Copyright laws: because fuck making new content when that stuff you made 10 years ago still makes money

Ledan said:
Wait, I'm in Canada and I recently heard from some Canadians that they put an upper limit of 5,000 on piracy. As in, you can't be sued for more than 5,000 for downloading media content.
This should prove to be interesting.
This so much, case gets disposed on this alone
 

Whispering Death

New member
May 24, 2009
197
0
0
Khanht Cope said:
Could we come to see the establishment of a new business model made up of one part selling your product, and one part looking for people to sue?
Actually, there are "companies" already doing this.

One example is in the tech space companies buy up a boat-load of patents on the cheap and then see if they can't find a big company to use that is "infringing" on a recently acquired patent. The big company settles out of court for a few hundred thousand to a few million then they move on to the next thing.

Another interesting twist are porn companies. Some porn companies are now trying to put porn out there, get it illegally file-shared, and then go after the people sharing it. One of the more "famous" lawyers employing this tactic is a former divorce lawyer who now runs an "anti-piracy" law firm.
 

kburns10

You Gots to Chill
Sep 10, 2012
276
0
0
Voltage Pictures must be REALLY bored in their offices right now. We'll see how well this plays out (or doesn't).
 

Dryk

New member
Dec 4, 2011
981
0
0
PedroSteckecilo said:
We just can't get any of the GOOD stuff from The US can we... no American Style Netflix, no Amazon Music, no Pandora Radio... just anti-consumer copyright lawsuits...
It's a trap, they don't let you have cheap movies so you pirate them and they can sue you for a more "reasonable" price :p
 

SoulSalmon

New member
Sep 27, 2010
454
0
0
"We're going to get back at those who have downloaded our stuff illegally" Good on ya!
"By making each person who has done so pay us $10000!" Ok, fuck off -.-
 

Marendithias

New member
Sep 23, 2009
14
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
You know, I think all copyright lawyers should be rounded up and dumped into a volcano, and while were at it we should dump Voltage Pictures in there with 'em.
I couldn't agree with you more.


Timedraven 117 said:
This plan is likely to flop for Voltage. They are asking for ten grand for a movie that was not even that good, (From what i know). How much is the movie like 20 bucks? 10,000 $ for a twenty buck movie, its almost as if they are crying out they are greedy.

Also I don't think the government or the jurry want to sit through this kind of crap anyways. The goverment may block their request just form the absurdity of it all.

You would be surprised what wealthy companies can waste the court's time with. Also, the $ 10,000 is because they are trying to discourage infringement as well as seek damages for not just the download but the act of sharing and the other infringements that occurred as a result. It's all technical legal nonsense and really crooked/evil stuff.