Crispymongoose Presents... Sucker Punch

Recommended Videos

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,830
0
0
Okay, it's been a bloody long time since my last review. I'm not going to bother with the links to those, or connecting everything. They'll be under this name anyway somewhere in the forum archive if you're that interested. Anyway, without further ado, let me present my review of Sucker Punch!

[Img_Inline width="310" height="450" align="center"]http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/thegeekfiles/Sucker%20Punch%20new%20UK%20poster.jpg[/Img_Inline]​
[small]So, if the girls are all on the ground fighting, who's piloting the mech? Oh shi...[/small]​

Now, as you're probably aware if you regularly read reviews on this site, or anywhere, Sucker Punch has been pretty mixed with people's thoughts. Some love it, some hate it. It seems like the cinematic equivalent of Marmite. And yet, I find myself firmly in the Love It category. Just like I do with Marmite! Yay! Seriously, there is a lot to love about this film. It's by no means perfect, I mean, what movie is? There are a few flaws that slightly diminish the final product, but they're hardly the end of the world. On the whole, it's a pretty enjoyable flick, combining the best bits of Zack Snyder's style with a great plot and script. But it does fall down a few times.

The story starts with Babydoll (Emily Browning), who finds herself and her young sister being 'cared for' by their brutal stepfather after their mother passes away. When Babydoll tries to fight against him, and accidentally kills her sister, she gets sent to Lennox House, an insane asylum, where her stepfather pays the sleazy orderly Blue Jones (Oscar Issac) to forge the doctor's signature so she can be lobotomized. With only five days to escape, Babydoll and a group of fellow inmates fight within the prison of their own minds to escape the asylum, and free themselves forever. And that's where the plot starts to get a bit confusing. As the story switches between the asylum, the brothel that takes its place within Babydoll's mind, and the third place where she and the other girls fight to locate the items they need to 'escape', it becomes a bit awkward deciding what's real and what isn't. In a sense, you could say it's all real (well, gunfights and katanas and dragons notwithstanding), representing the fractured layers of Babydoll's subconscious as her journey steadily becomes more dangerous, and indeed, more urgent.

[Img_Inline height="300" width="600" align="center"]http://popcultureninja.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sucker-punch-141.jpg[/Img_Inline]​
[small]Don't wake the mother, he says. Well then why did you wake the bloody mother, you idiots?[/small]​

The first thing to get to grips with is the story. Zack Snyder has in the past tended to remake or adapt films, with only one, 300, being his own writing (and bear in mind that itself was adapted from Frank Miller's previous work). Sucker Punch is the first time he's had the freedom to come up with an entire world and plot entirely from scratch, and given his usual creativity and imagination as shines in his direction, we would naturally expect something equally imaginative here. Sucker Punch certainly fits the bill, and Snyder doesn't disappoint. Dialogue is surprisingly well written, while the film's pacing is pretty decent. Though occasionally we do get a few issues with the pacing of events, it flows well, and even the non-action scenes are engaging enough to keep most audiences happy. I found myself caring about the characters as real people too, something so many films fail to do for me. The cast do a great job in making the audience feel emotionally connected, something that is later quite important as events begin to unfold and the journey the girls undergo continues to develop.

Nevertheless, it does seem as if some of the characters could have been developed more in the actual script. Amber (Jamie Chung) and Blondie (Vanessa Hudgens) play a much lesser role in the story than the others, and much of the character development focuses around Babydoll, Blue as her main antagonist, and sisters Rocket (Jena Malone) and Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish). In building these characters up, and making the audience more emotionally invested in them, Snyder fails to give importance to the other, lesser characters, who then rely on the skills of their actors to give them the emotional depth required. Fortunately, the cast more than make up for this, but on Snyder's part it is a big error.

Cinematography is where the film really shines. Snyder has already proven himself a master of creative film-making, with the visuals of 300 and Watchmen, and Sucker Punch is no exception. In most films action sequences tend to be fast paced, choppy affairs, but Snyder takes this, runs with it, then adds a fair share of extremely long cuts that follow the girls as they proceed to kick ass. And it looks great. The choreography of the fighting, the visual effects, everything comes together to make a really bold and beautiful statement on visual cinema. Despite previous statements by Warner, the film isn't in 3D, which is fairly interesting given the style. In fact I'd go so far as to say it's one of a very few films that would look amazing in 3D, though it still looks good enough without. As for sound and music, it gets a bit loud at times, especially in the fight sequences, and I'd even admit it's too loud in some parts, which ruins the illusion a little. The music, however, and the score, are amazingly done, drawing the audience in to the fragments of Babydoll's mind, and the theme of the sound overall reflects the film theme marvelously. Emily Browning lent her vocals to certain songs on the soundtrack, including the opening cover of Eurythmics' 'Sweet Dreams' - a rather apt and emotionally poignant song for her. Music really is one of the few parts of this film that isn't let down in any way.

[Img_Inline width="700" height="300" align="center"]http://www.imfdb.org/w/images/7/79/SP8-Zepplin.jpg[/Img_Inline]​
[small]Because killing the undead Germans is always fun. And never controversial! Yay![/small]​

Beyond all this, there is the elephant in the room, the skimpy costumes the girls wear and the general sex appeal of the film. But as has been pointed out by others, particularly the cast themselves, Sucker Punch is at heart a story about female empowerment. The girls are all sexy, true, but they also undergo a journey of self discovery, and over time find that they have the strength of character to make their own fates and defy what others force them into. The underlying theme is one of girl power, even at the very end. The girls all get the very last laugh, which will make sense to anyone who's seen Sucker Punch already (those who haven't will understand, and it's surprising how much sense this conclusion makes). And I have to say, as a feminist film masquerading as an action-adventure thrill ride, it certainly does that job well.

[Img_Inline width="310" height="500" align="center"]http://brusimm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/SUCKER-PUNCH-Rocket.jpg[/Img_Inline]​
[small]Obligatory fanservice pic of Rocket, easily the sexiest girl in a group of sexy girls. Oh come on, you would too, wouldn't you?[/small]​

In conclusion, Sucker Punch is a pretty enjoyable film, and I loved it for the mix of cerebral pleasures regarding story, and the mindless action that makes it such a visual treat. There's just something about a film that does the action side well yet still makes you think hard and analyze it long after you've left the cinema, and Sucker Punch does that. There are a fair few flaws. Elements of the plot are left ambiguous, which is intentional on Snyder's part yet still acts as a bit of a bugbear. The finished product looks good, sounds good, and is good, but there are plenty of improvements still to be made. Regardless, it's nothing short of a success for Snyder as much as his earlier films, as well as a good indicator of how much potential he has as a writer if he can simply work on the niggling details. Certainly something I'd recommend, though your mileage may definitely vary...
 

Blow_Pop

Supreme Evil Overlord
Jan 21, 2009
4,861
0
0
the only thing I would add is that Babydoll's world stems from the fact that she is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from her mom and sister dying and her stepfather being who he is. I missed that the first time because I got caught up in the music but one of my friends pointed it out to me and I watched it again and can completely see it.

However I applaud your review.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,830
0
0
aprilmarie said:
the only thing I would add is that Babydoll's world stems from the fact that she is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from her mom and sister dying and her stepfather being who he is. I missed that the first time because I got caught up in the music but one of my friends pointed it out to me and I watched it again and can completely see it.

However I applaud your review.
Why, thank you very much :D. I agree on the PTSD thing, though I've heard mixed comments regarding how all that gets told at the start. Some say it's rushed, whereas I applauded the introduction, as a cinematic device it told a story clearly while leaving the right parts ambiguous, as the director wanted. And it got that over with quickly, allowing the film to get into the main bulk of the story without unnecessary padding. I dare say the people complaining it looked too much like a "shitty music video" would soon be complaining that it's too long and unnecessary if the introduction was given another five minutes or so. There's no pleasing some people, after all...
 

Outright Villainy

New member
Jan 19, 2010
4,331
0
0
Trivun said:
aprilmarie said:
the only thing I would add is that Babydoll's world stems from the fact that she is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from her mom and sister dying and her stepfather being who he is. I missed that the first time because I got caught up in the music but one of my friends pointed it out to me and I watched it again and can completely see it.

However I applaud your review.
Why, thank you very much :D. I agree on the PTSD thing, though I've heard mixed comments regarding how all that gets told at the start. Some say it's rushed, whereas I applauded the introduction, as a cinematic device it told a story clearly while leaving the right parts ambiguous, as the director wanted. And it got that over with quickly, allowing the film to get into the main bulk of the story without unnecessary padding. I dare say the people complaining it looked too much like a "shitty music video" would soon be complaining that it's too long and unnecessary if the introduction was given another five minutes or so. There's no pleasing some people, after all...
Except well, the intro adds nothing. I cared so little at the start it wasn't even funny. My biggest problem was how distant it was, and having blaring music over the more action orientated set pieces is great, for a supposedly emotionally engaging opening, it missfires wildly. Like I said in my review, I found the film got immensely better after that, once he slowed the hell down. If he wanted to he could have opened straight in the asylum, with some extremely brief exposition, and it would have been better for it. Show, don't tell and all that, but given how much it was mishandled it would have been a far superior alternative.
 

Lucane

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,491
0
0
Why does everyone seem to have a problem with the Bunny Mech being in a poster still with the Amber, Blondie, Sweet Pea, Rocket and Baby Doll standing in the fore ground they didn't just make it for Amber it was just for her during the Mission to obtain the map. They never said only she knew how to use it.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,830
0
0
Outright Villainy said:
Trivun said:
aprilmarie said:
the only thing I would add is that Babydoll's world stems from the fact that she is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from her mom and sister dying and her stepfather being who he is. I missed that the first time because I got caught up in the music but one of my friends pointed it out to me and I watched it again and can completely see it.

However I applaud your review.
Why, thank you very much :D. I agree on the PTSD thing, though I've heard mixed comments regarding how all that gets told at the start. Some say it's rushed, whereas I applauded the introduction, as a cinematic device it told a story clearly while leaving the right parts ambiguous, as the director wanted. And it got that over with quickly, allowing the film to get into the main bulk of the story without unnecessary padding. I dare say the people complaining it looked too much like a "shitty music video" would soon be complaining that it's too long and unnecessary if the introduction was given another five minutes or so. There's no pleasing some people, after all...
Except well, the intro adds nothing. I cared so little at the start it wasn't even funny. My biggest problem was how distant it was, and having blaring music over the more action orientated set pieces is great, for a supposedly emotionally engaging opening, it missfires wildly. Like I said in my review, I found the film got immensely better after that, once he slowed the hell down. If he wanted to he could have opened straight in the asylum, with some extremely brief exposition, and it would have been better for it. Show, don't tell and all that, but given how much it was mishandled it would have been a far superior alternative.
You make a decent point, but nevertheless I like the intro. And I personally feel it adds quite a bit to the story. The intro gave a lot of exposition in a short time, opening in the asylum gets rid of that and explaining things later would have slowed things down too much. The pacing of the film was great, and messing with it would have made that less so. Not to mention the very nice little cyclic bit near the start. We open with Baby Doll on a stage, get the intro, then close the intro with the rest of the main cast on that same stage with her looking in. As a cinematic device I really liked that, it set things up well for the main events later.

Nevertheless I do concede you make a good point with your own interpretation, and at the end of the day it's all subjective. One thing I will add here is that I really enjoyed the music. I didn't realise Emily Browning sung that cover of Sweet Dreams at the start until I saw it on Wikipedia later, and it sounded great. Very creepy and emotive, but awesome nonetheless. Well, I do like creepy music, after all...
 

Blow_Pop

Supreme Evil Overlord
Jan 21, 2009
4,861
0
0
Trivun said:
Outright Villainy said:
Trivun said:
aprilmarie said:
the only thing I would add is that Babydoll's world stems from the fact that she is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from her mom and sister dying and her stepfather being who he is. I missed that the first time because I got caught up in the music but one of my friends pointed it out to me and I watched it again and can completely see it.

However I applaud your review.
Why, thank you very much :D. I agree on the PTSD thing, though I've heard mixed comments regarding how all that gets told at the start. Some say it's rushed, whereas I applauded the introduction, as a cinematic device it told a story clearly while leaving the right parts ambiguous, as the director wanted. And it got that over with quickly, allowing the film to get into the main bulk of the story without unnecessary padding. I dare say the people complaining it looked too much like a "shitty music video" would soon be complaining that it's too long and unnecessary if the introduction was given another five minutes or so. There's no pleasing some people, after all...
Except well, the intro adds nothing. I cared so little at the start it wasn't even funny. My biggest problem was how distant it was, and having blaring music over the more action orientated set pieces is great, for a supposedly emotionally engaging opening, it missfires wildly. Like I said in my review, I found the film got immensely better after that, once he slowed the hell down. If he wanted to he could have opened straight in the asylum, with some extremely brief exposition, and it would have been better for it. Show, don't tell and all that, but given how much it was mishandled it would have been a far superior alternative.
You make a decent point, but nevertheless I like the intro. And I personally feel it adds quite a bit to the story. The intro gave a lot of exposition in a short time, opening in the asylum gets rid of that and explaining things later would have slowed things down too much. The pacing of the film was great, and messing with it would have made that less so. Not to mention the very nice little cyclic bit near the start. We open with Baby Doll on a stage, get the intro, then close the intro with the rest of the main cast on that same stage with her looking in. As a cinematic device I really liked that, it set things up well for the main events later.

Nevertheless I do concede you make a good point with your own interpretation, and at the end of the day it's all subjective. One thing I will add here is that I really enjoyed the music. I didn't realise Emily Browning sung that cover of Sweet Dreams at the start until I saw it on Wikipedia later, and it sounded great. Very creepy and emotive, but awesome nonetheless. Well, I do like creepy music, after all...
Trivun I have to agree with liking the intro. If the intro wasn't there I would have been lost in the movie cause I would have wanted to know why she was there how she got there. But I like to know details.