I've been reading this since the contest here, and I'm probably going to open a huge can of worms here (and probably get called a few nasty things here and there and be accused of being jealous of this comic's success), but I'm not too fond of this comic here and I question the tastes of those who like this comic.
Now, I actually liked the very first 4 comics that were shown, I didn't like the art though as it looked very grainy and didn't look like a whole lot of effort was put into it (That's just my first opinion though, but I'll get on the art subject later), but it at least had it's moments. I think the beardsplosion probably cemented it's win along with the subject of game reporters as opposed to 2 guys on a couch and I wish I had thought of that ;3. Reading these latest comics makes me wonder just what exactly happened to the writing process behind this.
Comic #5 instantly comes to my mind as it really makes me cringe, and even though this comic is just beginning as many of you are quick to point out, that was still very tasteless on behalf of the writer and artist. The guy is minus a fucking jawbone right now and fighting cancer! Gamers are constantly misquoting his whole "I don't view games as an art form and they're more like a sport" as "Games aren't art. PERIOD!" So what's the joke there? "EBERT DUN LIEK GAMES! VIOLENCE IS THE ANSWER TO THOSE WHO HAVE LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS ABOUT ANYTHING! KILL THE STUPID FUCKER! ARGLEFLARGLE!" Ugh... I think I'm going to puke. This is juvenile at the least and in very poor taste. The rest of the comic so far has been... OK I suppose, it's got the right formula, build-up and punchline at the end, but the jokes are forced at best and bogged down by a lot of dialogue. Also, who are half these characters, and what's with that hamster everybody is getting all giddy about? I don't think it's funny, I think it looks like a bouncing turd and is a distraction.
Let me piss you folks off even further by talking about the art. OK, I don't hate it, I think there's a lot going on here that's actually very promising if a bit flawed, I like how the guy is actually drawing backgrounds! Lord knows how many people skip over that in webcomics. However, they still look very sloppy and rushed, and his anatomy seriously needs to level up here shortly. Look at those hands in the first panel of comic #8, the girl's left hand has no thumb (oh what, that tiny triangle just barely poking out is a thumb? Take a look at your own hand and call me back if it looks just like that, I can recommend a good doctor who can fix up that strange hand condition you have), she has one finger on that same hand, and a big flipper with 2 lines in the middle of it. The man's right hand is just a square with 3 lines in it and has a thumb attached to it, left hand has some Grinch fingers going on there, they shouldn't curve like that!
The art here is OK, but damn is it inconsistent and rushed. Get some life studies under your belt dude, they'll seriously improve your knowledge a thousand fold and improve your art as well!
So far the first impression of this comic on my end of the spectrum is not good, seriously, what's up with comic #5? Did he just shit in everybody's cereal or something? That was fucking weak sauce and people should get over it. Jokes are forced, art has promise but is rushed to the point where looks unprofessional. I would like to see this comic improve shortly over time, and I'm sure it will. To the creators, I mean no ill will to you (aside from making comic #5), you should look up works by Andrew Loomis for some studies on art (they will be a godsend) along with studying works from pros like the man who did the Watchmen novel http://lforlloyd.deviantart.com/ , and you should take notes from comics like Perry Bible Fellowship, Supertron, Penny Arcade, and Dr. McNinja, doing that would greatly improve your comic! Good luck you two.