Mortai Gravesend said:
I'll repeat what I said in the other thread first:
Well it's his right to take it away and if she's being a brat, sure. But I think using a gun like that seems kind of irresponsible. I mean really, he's treating a weapon kind of like a toy there. And destroying it at all seems immature. Keep it from her, sell it, give it away, but why waste it? Out of some silly rage at a stupid comment?
As for your argument... Well I think that's silly. It's not as if there appeared to be any real danger to him firing into a laptop on the ground outside. Why would that change your mind? It seems a tad irresponsible as I said, but it didn't appear to be anything serious. No apparent danger really. If he pulled it out and started shooting at the laptop while she was using it, then that would seem problematic. This just seems... childish but not an issue.
Symbolism.
That's why he destroyed it. But I do realize that effigies aren't quite the rage for the average person as they once were.
He fired at a non-living object in the middle of farmland with no other living thing for a great distance away.
People fire guns every day all over the country at nonliving things within far closer proximity of other people.
Would I have been less concerned had he used a hammer, or a sword, or something else? Not really. He did something that would have been fairly commonplace a few generations back (just shooting something else instead of a laptop, wooden toys maybe).
He lost count? Well yeah...he's kind of doing a video and only has one take. I'm fairly camera shy myself and flub my thoughts.
My father and grandfathers were bother farmers, they take disobedience extremely seriously. I don't condone it but this guy acted like just about anyone I've known in his (apparent) profession.
alandavidson said:
Read the law, it's there. Once you give someone something as a gift, it's that person's property.
As far as parenting goes, taking the laptop away from her for a while would probably do the girl good (and not a felony). What would be better: Family counseling.
I don't believe this is the case with kids. If it was then parents couldn't take away the money of child stars.
J.j. Trusello said:
Parents should shoot things when their child misbehaves, yeah that makes sense. Lets just have everyone shoot something when someone disrespects them. Im pretty sure thats where the phrase an eye for an eye comes from.
No I'm pretty sure that phrase came from maiming someone who maimed you, etc.
If someone punched you and you in turn punched a tree, that's not an eye for an eye, its not even on the same planet.
If everyone shot inanimate things to vent their anger I imagine we'd have less people getting hurt. I know personally getting into martial arts helped me vent out an incredible amount of internal turmoil as a young person, I ended up a happy and healthy individual.
Violence against nonliving things or safely with another willing person is a great way to help burn off steam and produce a fairly copious amount of endorphins.
I'm saying this also as someone who is deeply against war and violence against unwilling people. These things are some of the highest levels of horror in my eyes. People should be far more concerned with the reckless ejection of soldiers into foreign lands than a random guy shooting a portable computer.