DARPA Announces Build-A-Rescue-Robot Competition

Hevva

Shipwrecked, comatose, newsie
Aug 2, 2011
1,500
0
0
DARPA Announces Build-A-Rescue-Robot Competition



This humanitarian version of Robot Wars involves a $2 million grand prize and the chance to help disaster victims in need.

Although it's common practice for geeks of all stripes to howl the word "Skynet" at any kind of robotic technology which possesses functions more complex than those of your average can-opener, there exist in our lives many mechanical friends deserving of much better treatment. First and foremost among these particular bots are mechanized First Responders, a group of machines built to assist distressed humans in especially dangerous places, such as nuclear disaster zones or buildings damaged by earthquakes.

We all agree that the world could use more of these things, right? Would you like $2 million in exchange for creating some? If your answer to that is yes, get this: the U.S. Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has just announced a build-a-rescue-robot competition [www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/04/10.aspx] with a grand prize of $2 million.

The competition will begin in October 2012 and is aimed at "hardware, software, modeling and gaming developers" with a desire to "link with emergency response and science communities to design robots capable of supervised autonomous response to simulated disaster." DARPA is keen, it seems, to see what advances can be made by combining the knowledge and creativity of robotics experts with that of developers from fields outside of robotics.

The hero-bots involved will be asked to "compete in challenges involving staged disaster-response scenarios in which robots will have to successfully navigate a series of physical tasks corresponding to anticipated, real-world disaster-response requirements." The one which saves the most pretend disaster-babies, presumably, will win.

"The work of the global robotics community brought us to this point - robots do save lives, do increase efficiencies and do lead us to consider new capabilities," said DARPA project managed Gill Pratt. "This challenge is going to test supervised autonomy in perception and decision-making, mounted and dismounted mobility, dexterity, strength and endurance in an environment designed for human use but degraded due to a disaster," she continued.

"The key to successfully completing this challenge requires adaptable robots with the ability to use available human tools, from hand tools to vehicles," added Pratt.

More information on the competition and DARPA's upcoming virtual Proposers' Day Workshop (scheduled for April 16) is available here [https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=ee8e770bcfe1fe217472342c67d6bd5a&tab=core&_cview=0]. Rescue-robots have become an integral feature of first response disaster rescue in recent years, ferreting their way into dangerous and hard-to-reach places to identify sources of harm and people in need. The more, the merrier. Oh, and, y'know, $2 million for the one which does it best. Good luck roboteers!


Source: DARPA [www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/04/10.aspx]



Permalink
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing. DARPA need to make it $8 million plus to make it worth while for anyone in the commercial world.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
That's pretty nice. I hope they design a cool competition course for it, like a post-apocalyptic city block or something.

Hevva said:
Although it's common practice for geeks of all stripes to howl the word "Skynet" at any kind of robotic technology which possesses functions more complex than those of your average can-opener,
Pretty sure that's done in jest; geeks probably appreciate technology more than most other people :p
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
Course, building a robot that can adapt to most human tools, drive vehicles, and get into any location regardless of the difficulty...there's no way that could go horribly wrong, right?
 

Pyrian

Hat Man
Legacy
Jul 8, 2011
1,399
8
13
San Diego, CA
Country
US
Gender
Male
I wonder what "supervised autonomous" means?

albino boo said:
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing.
Watch, the winner is going to be some kid with a lego set.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Ah, DARPA. Encouraging mad science since 1958.

Anyway the results of this should be interesting. Biulding one machine capable of using multiple hand tools designed for humans and driving a car is no small feat.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
albino boo said:
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing. DARPA need to make it $8 million plus to make it worth while for anyone in the commercial world.
Why would it need to be anyone in the commercial world? Amateur and recreational builders can do plenty on a shoe string budget. Ever seen Robot Wars?


Try reading the article.

The competition will begin in October 2012 and is aimed at "hardware, software, modeling and gaming developers" with a desire to "link with emergency response and science communities to design robots capable of supervised autonomous response to simulated disaster." DARPA is keen, it seems, to see what advances can be made by combining the knowledge and creativity of robotics experts with that of developers from fields outside of robotics.


Pyrian said:
I wonder what "supervised autonomous" means?

albino boo said:
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing.
Watch, the winner is going to be some kid with a lego set.

I wouldn't be surprised at all.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
Being gunned down by a Duplo-nater is probably one of the least dignified ways to go.
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,033
0
0
weirdguy said:
Course, building a robot that can adapt to most human tools, drive vehicles, and get into any location regardless of the difficulty...there's no way that could go horribly wrong, right?
They're already making those for the military. And they work.
 

Lono Shrugged

New member
May 7, 2009
1,467
0
0
Wasn't there a guy who made a snake robot you could make in a 3d printer that cost surprisingly little? Or did I eat the brown acid that day?

Anyway, bio-mechanical bugs are the way to go on this one. Or some kind of mimetic poly alloy. All of Cameron's films are good for ideas.
 

Beryl77

New member
Mar 26, 2010
1,599
0
0
LogicNProportion said:
Metal...Gear?
Inventor: "Yeah, so my robot can adapt in pretty much every environment and use a great number of tools. I'm sure he'll be very useful in hazardous environments."
DARPA: " That's very nice."
Inventor: "Oh and he has guns, shoots lasers and can launch nukes from every location you want."
DARPA: "Whait, what?"
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
albino boo said:
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing. DARPA need to make it $8 million plus to make it worth while for anyone in the commercial world.
Well, I think the idea is to try and get engineers that aren't in the commercial sector motivated, with this being a sort of "proof of concept" as much as anything.

A lot of the people attracted to this aren't going to be doing it for the money, as much as the recognition. What's more a lot of engineering and robotics students can frequently get free access to the tools anr resources of universities for their projects, which is why in similar situations you've seen submissions by classes of or teams of students rather than specific individuals.

It's really quite clever because for an offer of 2 million dollars, DARPA is probably going to wind up with the equivilent of billions being spent on looking into this. The guy, or team, who wins this is probably going to be able to write his/their own ticket for employment as an engineer in the robotics field.


That said, I welcome the advancement of technology, and rather than Skynet I sort of see a future where we might live alongside robots ala Asimov's writings... and this is coming from a hate filled, cynical, pessimist. :)
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
Therumancer said:
albino boo said:
$2 million is that all. Its going to cost more than that to build the dam thing. DARPA need to make it $8 million plus to make it worth while for anyone in the commercial world.
Well, I think the idea is to try and get engineers that aren't in the commercial sector motivated, with this being a sort of "proof of concept" as much as anything.

A lot of the people attracted to this aren't going to be doing it for the money, as much as the recognition. What's more a lot of engineering and robotics students can frequently get free access to the tools anr resources of universities for their projects, which is why in similar situations you've seen submissions by classes of or teams of students rather than specific individuals.

It's really quite clever because for an offer of 2 million dollars, DARPA is probably going to wind up with the equivilent of billions being spent on looking into this. The guy, or team, who wins this is probably going to be able to write his/their own ticket for employment as an engineer in the robotics field.


That said, I welcome the advancement of technology, and rather than Skynet I sort of see a future where we might live alongside robots ala Asimov's writings... and this is coming from a hate filled, cynical, pessimist. :)


In Asimov's writings the last human society to use robots were hermaphroditic nutjobs who hated being seen by any other human. Not the greatest outcome.