So, back to this thing from the old forums. Title should be self-explanatory.
Anyway, getting down to it:
gen:LOCK: Season 1 (4/5)
So, this came as a surprise, in that I liked it as much as I did. Not usually into 'mech fiction,' and when I say I enjoyed the season, it wasn't because of the mech action. TBH, I think mechs are silly in that there's no real reason to use them as opposed to a tank. Mechs as part of a sci-fi setting? Sure. Mechs as the basis for that setting? Eh...
Okay, that aside, I'm going to start with the Achilles heel of gen:LOCK, and that's its worldbuilding, or rather, the lack of it. So it's the year 2072, with all the gizmos you'd expect, and the world is divided between the Polity (an extension of the UN or a replacement, it's kind of vague), and the Union. The Union is bad, because we're told it's bad, and it does bad things, and its colour schemes are mixes of reds and blacks, so they're bad, and...okay, we don't really know anything about the Union. Why there was a cold war, why it went hot, why some people follow the Union, why it wants to take over the world, etc. I assume all the characters know, but we, the viewer, don't. What's more, one of the main characters is a former Union member, and another spent time as a resistance operative fighting against them, but the Union is a vague, barely defined threat that the series never elaborates on, and frankly, it's kind of bizzare. Yes, I can make inferences about the Union - it's totalitarian, it has it out for "intellectuals," its slogan is "we can lead the world without compromise," but none of this is solid worldbuilding. Maybe this will be alleviated in the second season (if it's released), but as it stands, the lack of worldbuilding is noticable.
Another issue - this cartoon/anime has a case of "good aesthetic, bad animation." As in, everything looks nice, with a good, if arguably stock, use of colour. However, it has a problem when showing human movement. A lot of the time, the animation of humans feels stiff, especially in combat. I've noticed that mechs (which are the dominant war machine on both sides) move in a standard way, and that makes sense - they're mechs. However, infantry marches in a standard way, and even as soldiers, they feel far too uniform, far too stiff.
Getting to the good stuff are the characters. I can't really call any of them deep, but none of them are shallow. There's a good team dynamic that, the final episode aside, manages to avoid "power of friendship" or other such nonsense (said episode being the point where they get uniforms resembling those of the Power Rangers because...yay friendship?) For those familiar with the series, Cammie seems to be the fan favourite, and, yeah, pretty much. That said, people why say Chase is the most boring of the bunch, I'll disagree with. Yes, he's the 'straight man' of the group, but he gets the most character development of said group, so, yeah. There's a lot of celebrity voice actors here (or at least actors that I recognise), but they all do a good job, and none of it feels forced. Yes, David Tennant is playing the wacky doctor, and Maisie Williams is playing the girl who seems cute but can go psycho if you push her, but, um, yeah.
So, good stuff.
Anyway, getting down to it:
gen:LOCK: Season 1 (4/5)
So, this came as a surprise, in that I liked it as much as I did. Not usually into 'mech fiction,' and when I say I enjoyed the season, it wasn't because of the mech action. TBH, I think mechs are silly in that there's no real reason to use them as opposed to a tank. Mechs as part of a sci-fi setting? Sure. Mechs as the basis for that setting? Eh...
Okay, that aside, I'm going to start with the Achilles heel of gen:LOCK, and that's its worldbuilding, or rather, the lack of it. So it's the year 2072, with all the gizmos you'd expect, and the world is divided between the Polity (an extension of the UN or a replacement, it's kind of vague), and the Union. The Union is bad, because we're told it's bad, and it does bad things, and its colour schemes are mixes of reds and blacks, so they're bad, and...okay, we don't really know anything about the Union. Why there was a cold war, why it went hot, why some people follow the Union, why it wants to take over the world, etc. I assume all the characters know, but we, the viewer, don't. What's more, one of the main characters is a former Union member, and another spent time as a resistance operative fighting against them, but the Union is a vague, barely defined threat that the series never elaborates on, and frankly, it's kind of bizzare. Yes, I can make inferences about the Union - it's totalitarian, it has it out for "intellectuals," its slogan is "we can lead the world without compromise," but none of this is solid worldbuilding. Maybe this will be alleviated in the second season (if it's released), but as it stands, the lack of worldbuilding is noticable.
Another issue - this cartoon/anime has a case of "good aesthetic, bad animation." As in, everything looks nice, with a good, if arguably stock, use of colour. However, it has a problem when showing human movement. A lot of the time, the animation of humans feels stiff, especially in combat. I've noticed that mechs (which are the dominant war machine on both sides) move in a standard way, and that makes sense - they're mechs. However, infantry marches in a standard way, and even as soldiers, they feel far too uniform, far too stiff.
Getting to the good stuff are the characters. I can't really call any of them deep, but none of them are shallow. There's a good team dynamic that, the final episode aside, manages to avoid "power of friendship" or other such nonsense (said episode being the point where they get uniforms resembling those of the Power Rangers because...yay friendship?) For those familiar with the series, Cammie seems to be the fan favourite, and, yeah, pretty much. That said, people why say Chase is the most boring of the bunch, I'll disagree with. Yes, he's the 'straight man' of the group, but he gets the most character development of said group, so, yeah. There's a lot of celebrity voice actors here (or at least actors that I recognise), but they all do a good job, and none of it feels forced. Yes, David Tennant is playing the wacky doctor, and Maisie Williams is playing the girl who seems cute but can go psycho if you push her, but, um, yeah.
So, good stuff.